The concept of urban sustainability governance has developed as an institutional guiding concept to holistically address the vitality of cities under a long-term perspective and is based on the collaborative efforts of government, administration, business, science, and the civil society. Yet, the initiation and implementation of this guiding concept faces a variety of barriers, including deficient conceptualization, unfamiliarity, detrimental organizational structures, and inertia. We examine the initiation of urban sustainability governance in the City of Richmond, British Columbia, Canada. On the basis of the reviews of administrative documents and interviews with staff across various administrative levels and units, we reflect on achievements and shortcomings against guidelines of urban sustainability governance spelled out in the literature. Our study indicates accomplishments in the conceptualization of a vision and overall framework to operate from, but also a number of deficits in specifying sustainability targets, applying governance principles, and evaluating impacts. Additionally, we discuss how administrative structures influence how urban sustainability governance is being implemented. We draw conclusions regarding general factors for succeeding in the initiation and implementation of urban sustainability governance.
AdgerW NBrownKFairbrassJJordanAPaavolaJRosendoSSeyfangG, 2003, “Governance for sustainability: Towards a ‘thick’ analysis of environmental decisionmaking”Environment and Planning A351095–1110
2.
AstleithnerFHamedingerAHomanNRydinY, 2004, “Institutions and indicators: The discourse about indicators in the context of sustainability”Journal of Housing and the Built Environment197–24
3.
BerkeP, 2002, “Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century”Journal of Planning Literature1721–36
4.
BerkePConroyM, 2000, “Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans”Journal of the American Planning Association6621–33
5.
BerkePBackhurstMDayMEricksenNLaurianLCrawfordJDixonJ, 2006, “What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33581–600
6.
BulkeleyH, 2006, “Urban sustainability: Learning from best practice?”Environment and Planning A381029–1044
7.
CherpAGeorgeCKirkpatrickC, 2004, “A methodology for assessing national sustainable development strategies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy22913–926
8.
City of Richmond, 2007, “Charting our path towards a sustainable community”, Publication No. 2221856, Richmond, BC
9.
ConroyM, 2006, “Moving the middle ahead: Challenges and opportunities of sustainability in Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio”Journal of Planning Education and Research2618–27
10.
ConroyM MBerkeP R, 2004, “What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development”Environment and Planning A361381–1396
11.
CowellROwensS, 2006, “Governing space: Planning reform and the politics of sustainability”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24403–421
12.
DaleA, 2001At the Edge: Sustainable Development in the 21st Century (University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver)
13.
DeakinMHuovilaPRaoSSunikkaMVreekerR, 2002, “The assessment of sustainable urban development”Building Research and Information3095–108
14.
DenhardtJ VDenhardtR B, 2003The New Public Service: Serving, not Steering (M E Sharpe, Armonk, NY)
15.
EvansJJonesP, 2008, “Rethinking sustainable urban regeneration: Ambiguity, creativity, and the shared territory”Environment and Planning A401416–1434
16.
FriedmannJ, 1993, “Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning”Journal of the American Planning Association59482–485
17.
GibbsDJonasAWhileA, 2002, “Changing governance structures and the environment: Economy–environment relations at the local and regional scales”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning4123–138
18.
GibsonR, 2006, “Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach”Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal24170–182
19.
GoreCRobinsonP, 2009, “Local government response to climate change: Our last, best hope?”, inChanging Climates in North American Politics Eds SelinHVanDeveerS, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 137–158
20.
GraymoreMSipeNRicksonR, 2008, “Regional sustainability: How useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale?”Ecological Economics67362–372
21.
GustonD, 2008, Innovation policy: Not just a jumbo shrimp”Nature54940–941
22.
HealeyP, 1996, “Consensus-building across difficult divisions: New approaches to collaborative strategy making”Planning Practice and Research11207–216
23.
HoernigHSeasonsM, 2004, “Monitoring of indicators in local and regional planning practice: Concepts and issues”Planning Practice and Research1981–99
24.
HoldenM, 2011, forthcoming, “Urban policy engagement with social sustainability in Metro Vancouver”Urban Studies doi: 10.1177/0042098011403015
25.
HuttonT A, 2011, “Thinking metropolis: From the ‘livable region’ to the ‘sustainable metropolis’ in Vancouver”International Planning Studies16237–255
26.
InnesJBooherD, 2003, “The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity”, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California,
27.
JordanA, 2008, “The governance of sustainable development: Taking stock and looking forwards”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2617–33
28.
KempRPartoSGibsonR, 2005, “Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice”International Journal of Sustainable Development812–30
29.
KrippendorffK, 2004Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
30.
KruegerRAgyemanJ, 2005, “Sustainability schizophrenia or ‘actually existing sustainabilities?’ Toward a broader understanding of the politics and promise of local sustainability in the US”Geoforum36410–417
31.
LindblomC, 1979, “Still muddling, not yet through”Public Administration Review39517–526
32.
MaclarenV W, 1996, “Urban sustainability reporting”Journal of the American Planning Association62184–202
33.
McNeilADaykinM, 2008a, “City of Richmond's corporate triple bottom line guide: A primer for projects and initiatives”, REDMS # 2305873, City of Richmond, BC
34.
McNeilADaykinM, 2008b, “Corporate sustainability initiative: 2008 detailed work program”, REDMS # 2333331, City of Richmond, BC
35.
NewmanPJenningsI, 2008Cities as Sustainable Ecosystems: Principles and Practices (Island Press, Washington, DC)
36.
PierreJ, (Ed.), 2000Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
37.
PincetlS, 2010, “From the sanitary city to the sustainable city: Challenges to institutionalising biogenic (nature's services) infrastructure”Local Environment1543–58
38.
RavetzJ, 2000, “Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions”Environmental Impact Assessment Review2031–64
39.
RobinsonJTinkerJ, 1997, “Reconciling ecological, economic, and social imperatives: A new conceptual framework”, inSurviving Globalism: Social and Environmental Dimensions Ed. SchreckerT, (Palgrave Macmillan, London) pp 71–94
40.
RusselDJordanA, 2009, “Joining up or pulling apart? The use of appraisal to coordinate policy making for sustainable development”Environment and Planning A411201–1216
41.
SahaDPatersonR G, 2008, “Local government efforts to promote the ‘three Es’ of sustainable development: Survey in medium to large cities in the United States”Journal of Planning Education and Research2821–37
42.
ShipleyR, 2002, “Visioning in planning: Is the practice based on sound theory?”Environment and Planning A347–22
43.
SomervilleKDeckerKDaykinM, 2009, “Corporate sustainability initiative internal communications plan”, REDMS # 2504197, City of Richmond, BC
44.
SummervilleJAdkinsBKendallG, 2008, “Community participation, rights, and responsibilities: The governmentality of sustainable development policy in Australia”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26696–711
45.
SvaraJ, 2011, “The early stage of local government action to promote sustainability”, in The Municipal Year Book 2011 (ICMA Press, Washington, DC) pp 43–60
46.
TonnBEnglishMTravisC, 2000, “A framework for understanding and improving environmental decision making”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management43163–183
47.
United Nations Population Fund, 2012, “The state of world population 2011: People and possibilities in a world of 7 billion”, New York
48.
van BuerenEten HeuvelhofE, 2005, “Improving governance arrangements in support of sustainable cities”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3247–66
49.
van Zeijl-RozemaACorversRKempRMartensP, 2008, “Governance for sustainable development: A framework”Sustainable Development16410–421
50.
WCED, 1987Our Common Future World Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
51.
WhileAJonasAGibbsD, 2009, “From sustainable development to carbon control: Eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban regional development”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series3576–93
52.
WiekABinderC, 2005, “Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions”Environmental Impact Assessment Review25598–608
53.
WiekAWalterA, 2009, “A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems”European Journal of Operational Research197360–370
