In an effort to understand how to promote more sustainable forms of energy provision, researchers have begun addressing the scale of political and governance processes, yet the effects of sub-national government remain neglected. At the same time, analysts of political devolution, decentralisation and independence have rarely given attention to the energy sector. Papers in this special issue seek to better understand the relationship between sub-national government and pathways to sustainable energy: examining how city-regional and devolved governments have shaped agendas for building retrofit; elucidating the importance of decentralised governance in knitting together electricity, heat and transport energy markets; mapping the complex, fuzzy spatial organisation of legal powers to direct energy policy across multi-level polities; and analysing conflicts over the allocation of energy infrastructure consenting powers between national and devolved governments. The papers highlight the interdependencies of action in different governmental arenas, and reinforce arguments for greater central-to-local reflexivity in governance styles. Analysing the interface between sub-national government and energy transition also raises new questions about the meaning of ‘sovereignty’, the fragmentary nature of democratic control over energy systems, and the effects of boundaries.
Adams J and Robinson P (eds) (2002) Devolution in Practice. Public Policy Differences Within the UK. London: IPPR.
2.
AdgerNArnellNWTompkinsEL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change15: 77–86.
3.
BarryA (2002) The anti-political economy. Economy and Society31(2): 268–284.
4.
BarryA (2006) Technological zones. European Journal of Social Theory9(2): 239–253.
5.
BarryA (2012) Political situations: Knowledge controversies in transnational governance. Critical Policy Studies6(3): 324–336.
6.
BensonDJordanAJ (2010) The scaling of water governance tasks: A comparative federal analysis of the European Union and Australia. Environmental Management46(1): 7–16.
7.
BeveridgeRKernK (2013) The Energiewende in Germany: Background, developments and future challenges. Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review4(1): 3–12.
8.
BoltanskiL (2009) On Critique. A Sociology of Emancipation, Paris: Gallimard.
9.
BoltanskiLThévenot (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BombergEMcEwenN (2012) Mobilizing community energy. Energy Policy51: 435–444.
11.
Bradbury J and Mawson J (eds) (1997) British Regionalism and Devolution. The Challenges of State Reform and European Integration. London: Jessica Kingsley.
12.
BridgeGBouzarovskiSBradshawMet al.(2013) Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low carbon economy. Energy Policy53: 331–340.
13.
Bruyninckx H, Happaerts S and van den Brande K (eds) (2012) Sustainable Development and Subnational Governments. Policy-Making and Multi-Level Interactions. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
BulkeleyHCastan BrotoV (2013) Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers38: 361–375.
15.
CoenenLBenneworthPTrufferB (2012) Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy41: 968–979.
CowellR (2004) Market regulation and planning action: Burying the impact of electricity networks. Planning Theory and Practice5(3): 307–325.
18.
CowellR (2007) Wind power and “the planning problem”: The experience of Wales. European Environment17(5): 291–306.
19.
CowellR (2010) Wind power, landscape and strategic spatial planning – The construction of “acceptable locations” in Wales. Land Use Policy27(2): 222–232.
20.
Cowell R (2016) Decentralising energy governance? Wales, devolution and the politics of energy infrastructure decision-making. Environment and Planning ‘C’, Government and Policy 35(7): 1242–1263.
21.
Cowell R, Ellis G, Sherry-Brennan F, et al. (2015) Re-scaling the governance of renewable energy: Lessons from the UK devolution experience. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning (published online 17 February 15).
22.
CowellRGeraint EllisSherry-BrennanFet al.(2017) Energy transitions, sub-national government and regime flexibility: How has devolution in the United Kingdom affected renewable energy development?Energy Research and Social Science23: 169–181.
23.
Cox E, Royston S and Selby J (2016) The Impact of Non-Energy Policies in the Energy System: A Scoping Paper. University of Sussex, UK: UK Energy Research Centre.
24.
De Laurentis C, Eames M and Hunt M (2016) Retrofitting the built environment ‘to save’ energy: Arbed, the emergence of a distinctive sustainability transition pathway in Wales. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 35(7): 1156–1175.
FlindersMWoodM (2014) Depoliticisation, governance and the state. Policy and Politics42(2): 135–149.
27.
FoxonTJ (2013) Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future. Energy Policy52: 10–24.
28.
GibbsDLintzG (2016) Editorial: Environmental governance of urban and regional development – Scales and sectors, conflict and cooperation. Regional Studies50(6): 925–928.
29.
HelmD (2003) Energy, the State, and the Market. British Energy Policy since 1979, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
HodsonMMarvinS (2009) Cities mediating technological transitions: Understanding visions, intermediation and consequences. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management21: 515–534.
Hodson M and Marvin S (2016) The mutual construction of urban retrofit and scale: Governing ON, IN and WITH in Greater Manchester. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 35(7): 1198–1217.
33.
House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee (2017) Energy report, May 2017.
34.
Hvelplund F and Djørup S (2017) Multi-level policies for radical transition: Governance in a 100% renewable energy system. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 35(7): 1218–1241.
35.
JacobsM (1997) Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making institutions. In: FosterJ (ed.) Valuing Nature: Economics, Ethics and Environment, London: Routledge, pp. 211–231.
36.
KeatingM (2005) The Government of Scotland. Public Policy Making after Devolution, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
37.
Keating M (2012) Rethinking sovereignty. Independence-lite, devolution-max and national accommodation. REAF 16: 9–29.
38.
KernFSmithA (2008) Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy36: 4093–4103.
39.
KitscheltH (1986) Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science16: 58–95.
40.
KuzemkoC (2014) Politicising UK energy: What ‘speaking energy security’ can do. Policy and Politics42(2): 259–274.
41.
KuzemkoCLockwoodMMitchellCet al.(2016) Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, context and contingency. Energy Research and Social Science12: 96–105.
42.
LatourB (1986) The powers of association. In: LawJ (ed.) Power, Action, Belief, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 264–280.
43.
LittleG (2016) Energy and the Scotland Act 2016. Edinburgh Law Review20: 394–399.
MarksGHoogheLSchakelAH (2008) Measuring regional authority. Regional and Federal Studies18(2–3): 111–121.
46.
MarvinSGuyS (1997) Creating myths rather than sustainability: The transition fallacies of the new localism. Local Environment2(3): 311–318.
47.
MeadowcroftJ (2009) What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Science42: 323–340.
48.
MossT (2014) Socio-technical change and the politics of urban infrastructure: Managing energy in Berlin between dictatorship and democracy. Urban Studies51(7): 1432–1448.
49.
MossTNewigJ (2010) Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: Setting the stage for a broader debate. Environmental Management46(1): 1–6.
50.
MuinzerT (2017) Incendiary developments: Northern Ireland’s renewable heat incentive, and the collapse of the devolved government. UKELA E-Law99: 18–21.
51.
Muinzer T and Ellis G (2017) Subnational governance for the low carbon energy transition: Mapping the UK’s “energy constitution”. Environment and Planning C 35(7): 1176–1197.
52.
MurphyJSmithA (2013) Understanding transition-periphery dynamics: Renewable energy in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland. Environment and Planning A45: 691–709.
53.
Nairn T (1977) The Break-Up of Britain. London: New Left Books.
54.
Ngar-yin MahDHillsP (2014) Collaborative governance for technological innovation: A comparative case study of wind energy in Xinjiang, Shanghai, and Guangdong. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32(3): 509–529.
55.
Osmond J (ed) (1998) The National Assembly Agenda. Cardiff: Institute of Welsh Affairs.
56.
Pye S, Mathieu C and Deane P (2017) The energy sector implications of Brexit. January, INSIGHT_E.
57.
RavenRPJMSchotJWBerkhoutF (2012) Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions4: 63–78.
58.
RoylesEMcEwenN (2015) Empowered for action? Capacities and constraints in sub-state government climate action in Scotland and Wales. Environmental Politics24(6): 1034–1054.
59.
Setzer J (2014) How subnational governments are rescaling environmental governance: The case of the Brazilian state of São Paulo. Journal of Environmental Policy &Planning (published online 24 November 14).
60.
ShoveEWalkerG (2007) CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A39(4): 763–770.
61.
SmithA (2007) Emerging in between: The multi-level governance of renewable energy in the English regions. Energy Policy35(12): 6266–6280.
62.
SovacoolBKBrownMA (2009) Scaling the policy response to climate change. Policy and Society27: 317–328.
63.
SpäthPRohracherH (2014) Beyond localism: The spatial scale and scaling in energy transitions. In: PadtFJGOpdamPFMPolmanNBPet al.(eds) Scale-Sensitive Governance of the Environment, Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 106–121.
64.
SperlingKHvelplundFMathiesenB (2011) Centralisation and decentralization in strategic municipal energy planning in Denmark. Energy Policy39(3): 1338–1351.
65.
StevensonR (2015) Discourse, power and energy conflicts: Understanding Welsh renewable energy planning policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27(3): 512–526.
66.
StirlingA (2014) Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research and Social Science1: 83–95.
67.
Strachan P, Cowell R, Ellis G, et al. (2014) Promoting Community Renewable Energy in a Corporate Energy World: Policy Developments in the UK and the Impacts of Devolution. Papers in Environmental Planning Research 32, Cardiff School of Planning and Geography. ISBN 978-1-908442-06-2.
68.
TokeDSherry-BrennanFCowellRet al.(2013) Scotland, renewable energy and the independence debate: Will head or heart rule the roost?Political Quarterly84(1): 61–70.
69.
TrufferBCoenenL (2012) Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies46: 1–22.
70.
Turcu C and Rydin Y (2012) Planning for change in urban energy systems. Town and Country Planning 81(5): 227–232.
71.
Van Lieshout M, Dewulf A, Aarts N, et al. (2014) The power to frame the scale? Analysing scalar politics over, in and of a deliberative governance process. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning (published online 24 July 14; DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1008437).
72.
VerbongGLoorbachD (2012) Governing the Energy Transition. Reality, Illusion or Necessity?, London: Routledge.
73.
WalkerGDevine WrightPEvansBet al.(2006) Harnessing community energies: Explaining and evaluating community-based localism in renewable energy policy in the UK. Global Environmental Politics7(2): 64–82.
74.
WarrenCR (2014) Scales of disconnection: Mismatches shaping the geographies of emerging energy landscapes. Moravian Geographical Reports22(2): 7–14.
75.
Winskel M (2007) Multi-level governance and energy policy: Renewable energy in Scotland. In: Murphy J (ed) Governing Technology for Sustainability. London: Earthscan.
