Development of effective participatory mechanisms within infrastructure planning governance has been dependent on how far the outputs of participatory processes have an impact upon strategic policy priorities. However, neoliberal modes of governance are characterised by ‘recentralisation’ within arms-length regulatory bodies and private corporations. Tensions between participatory governance and recentralisation are exemplified by the relationship between energy privatisation and energy infrastructure planning. With this study we examine these tensions using a case study of a critical infrastructure project in the UK, the South Wales Gas Pipeline. Findings confirm arguments in the literature that siting conflicts often centre on policy issues as much as local concerns. The study reveals that the neoliberal recentralisation of some governance functions exacerbates such conflicts. We argue that, although new efforts to secure effective participation in neoliberal regimes are necessary, they will face obstacles in the form of risk-based governance structures, as exemplified by the privatised energy sector.
BBNPA, 2005a, “Response to South Wales and the West reinforcement pipelines route corridor investigation study (RCIS) Report”, Brecon Beacons National Park Authority, Brecon
4.
BBNPA, 2005b, “Statement of objection by the Brecon Beacons National Park Authority to the Department of Trade and Industry”, Brecon Beacons National Park Authority, Brecon
5.
BarkerK, 2006Barker Review of Land Use Planning (The Stationery Office, London)
6.
BarnettJBurninghamKWalkerGCassN, 2012, “Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK”Public Understanding of Science2136–50
BondAPalermJHaighP, 2004, “Public participation in EIA of nuclear power plant decommissioning projects: A case study analysis”Environmental Impact Assessment Review24617–641
9.
BristowGBryanJMundayMRocheN, 2007Economy, Business Community and FuturesWelsh Economy Research Unit, Cardiff
10.
BryanJMundayM, 2007Review of the PBI ENERGIZE ProgrammeWelsh Economy Research Unit, Cardiff
11.
BrymanABellE, 2007Business Research Methods (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
12.
CottonMDevine-WrightP, 2010a, “Making electricity networks ‘visible’: Industry actor representations of ‘publics’ and public engagement in infrastructure planning”Public Understanding of Science2717–35
13.
CottonMDevine-WrightP, 2010b, “NIMBYism and community consultation in electricity transmission network planning”, in Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation Ed. Devine-WrightP (Earthscan, London) pp 115–130
14.
CottonMDevine-WrightP, 2011, “Discourses of energy infrastructure development: A Q-method study of electricity transmission line siting in the UK”Environment and Planning A43942–960
15.
CottonMDevine-WrightP, 2012, “Putting pylons into place: A UK case study of public perspectives on the impacts of high voltage overhead transmission lines”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.716756
16.
CowellR, 2004, “Market regulation and planning action: Burying the impact of electricity networks?”Planning Theory and Practice5307–325
17.
CowellR, 2013, “The greenest government ever? Planning and sustainability in England after the May 2010 elections”Planning Practice and Research2827–44
18.
CowellROwensS, 2006, “Governing space: Planning reform and the politics of sustainability”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24403–421
19.
CowellROwensS, 2010, “Revisiting … Governing space: Planning reform and the politics of sustainability”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28952–957
20.
CowellROwensS, 2011Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process2nd edition (Routledge, London)
21.
DECC, 2009, Draft Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy (EN-1)Department of Energy and Climate Change (The Stationery Office, London)
22.
DefeuilleyC, 1999, “Competition and public service obligations: Regulatory rules and industries games”Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics7025–48
23.
DTI, 2003Our Energy Future—Creating a Low Carbon EconomyDepartment of Trade and Industry (The Stationery Office, Norwich)
24.
DTI, 2007The Public Gas Transporter Pipe-line Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 1999, Regulation 14: Felindre to Tirley Pipe-lineDepartment of Trade and Industry (The Stationery Office, London)
25.
ECCC, 2011The Revised Draft National Policy Statements on EnergyHouse of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee (The Stationery Office, London)
26.
Electricity Act, 1989Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 29 (The Stationery Office, London)
27.
FreudenburgW RPastorS K, 1992, “NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the syndromes”Journal of Social Issues4839–61
28.
GambleD J, 1978, “The Berger inquiry: An impact assessment process”Science199(4332) 946–951
29.
Gas Act, 1986Statutory Instruments 1986 1317 (The Stationery Office, London)
30.
Government of Wales Act, 1998Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 38 (The Stationery Office, London)
31.
GrossC, 2007, “Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance”Energy Policy352727–2736
32.
GuySGrahamSMarvinS, 1996, “Privatized utilities and regional governance: The new regional managers?”Regional Studies30733–739
33.
GuySGrahamSMarvinS, 1997, “Splintering networks: Cities and technical networks in 1990s Britain”Urban Studies34191–216
34.
GuySGrahamSMarvinS, 1999, “Cities, regions and privatised utilities”Progress in Planning5191–169
35.
HallDLobinaE, 2004, “Private and public interests in water and energy”Natural Resources Forum28268–277
36.
HardyMRitchieH, 2010, “Energy distribution and the new politics of regulation”, paper for Science and Technology Policy Research Conference: ‘Energy Transitions in an Interdependent World: What and Where are the Future Social Science Research Agendas?’, University of Sussex, 25–26 February, http://www.neopanora.com/en/sustainable-development/115.html
KelletJ E, 1993, “Role of the town and country planning system in controlling development of electricity generating installations”IEE Proceedings A14094–99
39.
Le-LasWShirleyE, 2012, “Does the planning system need a ‘tea party’?”Journal of Planning and Environment Law3239–243
40.
Localism Act, 2011Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 20 (The Stationery Office, London)
41.
McCollumD, 2006AGI Risk Assessment: Corse PRI submission to planning inquiry, application reference P0624/06/FUL, Forest of Dean District Council
42.
MannersG, 1997, “Gas market liberalization in Britain: Some geographical observations”Regional Studies31 page 296
43.
MarshDHallM, 2007, “The British political tradition: Explaining the fate of New Labour's constitutional reform agenda”British Politics2215–238
MarshallT, 2011, “Reforming the process for infrastructure planning in the UK/England 1990–2010”Town Planning Review82441–467
46.
MoranM, 2007The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
47.
National Grid, 2005Gas Transportation Ten Year Statement 2005National Grid, Warwick
48.
ODPM, 2004Planning Policy Statement 7: Sustainable Development in Rural AreasOffice of the Deputy Prime Minister (The Stationery Office, London)
49.
OwensS, 2004, “Siting, sustainable development and social priorities”Journal of Risk Research7101–114
50.
Planning Act, 2008Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 29 (The Stationery Office, London)
51.
PlummerMMellishR, 2007Secretary of State's Decision in Respect of Corse Gas Pressure Reduction Installation application reference P0624/06/FUL, Forest of Dean District Council
52.
Public Gas Transporter Pipe-Line Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations, 1999Statutory Instruments 1999 1672 (The Stationery Office, London)
53.
RoseN, 1999The Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
54.
RoughE, 2011, “Policy learning through public inquiries? The case of UK nuclear energy policy 1955–61”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2924–45
55.
RPS Planning, 2007, “Full planning application to install natural gas pressure reduction installation at land adjacent to Lime Street and Moorend Road off B4211, Corse, Gloucestershire: Statement of Case on Behalf of National Grid”, application reference P0624/06/FUL, Forest of Dean District Council
56.
SadlerD, 2001, “The political economy and regional implications of energy policy in Britain in the 1990s”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy193–28
57.
ScottJ C, 1998Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
58.
ScottPMillerCWoodC, 1998, “Planning and pollution: An unusual perspective on central—local relations”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy16529–542
59.
TesterD, 2010Report to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Appeal by National Grid Gas plc, Tirley Gas Pressure Reduction Installation, Tewkesbury Borough CouncilPlanning Inspectorate, Bristol
60.
Town and Country Planning Act, 1990Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 8 (HMSO, London)
61.
WalkerG, 2009, “Beyond distribution and proximity: Exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice”Antipode41614–636
62.
WallsJO'RiordanTHorlick-JonesTNiewöhnerJ, 2005, “The meta-governance of risk and new technologies: GM crops and mobile telephones”Journal of Risk Research8635–661
63.
WardD, 2001, “Stakeholder involvement in transport planning: Participation and power”Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal19119–130
64.
WinstoneRBoltonPGoreD, 2007Energy Security (House of Commons Library, London)
65.
WoolleyO, 2010, “Trouble on the horizon? Addressing place-based values in planning for offshore wind energy”Journal of Environmental Law22223–250
