Scholars have focused on understanding the motivations behind urban authorities' efforts to respond to climate change, yet the determinants of institutional response capacity are less well known, particularly in Latin America. This paper develops a framework to understand the political–economic determinants of institutional response capacity through an examination of climate change governance in Mexico City and Santiago, Chile. We ask whether being a frontrunner (Mexico City) is an indicator of greater institutional response capacity. Although Mexico City has slightly higher levels of institutional capacity than Santiago, both are faced with similar challenges, such as fragmented governance arrangements, asymmetries in access to information, and top-down decision making. However, both also have similar opportunities, such as leadership, participation in transnational networks, and potential to integrate climate change goals into existing policy agendas. Examining urban climate change planning in isolation from other institutions is therefore likely to provide a false sense of a city's response capacity.
AdgerW NArnellN WTompkinsE L, 2005, “Successful adaptation to climate change across scales”Global Environmental Change1577–86.
2.
AguilarA.SantosC., 2011, “Informal settlements' needs and environmental conservation in Mexico City: An unsolved challenge for land-use policy”Land Use Policy25649–662.
3.
AldunceP.LeónA., 2007, “Opportunities for improving disaster management in Chile: A case study”Disaster Prevention and Management1633–41.
4.
BauerC., 2009, “Dams and markets: Rivers and electric power in Chile”Natural Resources Journal49583–651.
5.
BetsillM.BulkeleyH., 2007, “Looking back and thinking ahead: A decade of cities and climate change research”Local Environment12447–456.
6.
BirkmannJ.GarschagenM.KraasF.QuangN., 2010, “Adaptive urban governance: New challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change”Sustainability Science5185–206.
7.
BorquezR.Garay-FlühmannR.ReyesB.ErazoM., 2009, “Institutional responses to climate change in Chile: Project ‘Coming down the mountain: Understanding the vulnerability of Andean communities to hydroclimatologic variability and global environmental change’”, paper from 5th meeting of Social Science Research in the Midwest Region and 2nd Binational Region IV of the Republic of Chile, 28–30 October; available from Social Science Faculty, University of San Juan (CD-ROM).
8.
BrooksN.AdgerN WKellyM P, 2005, “The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation”Global Environmental Change15151–163.
9.
BrownE.SaldiviaJ., 2000, “Informa nacional sobre la gestión del agua en Chile”, CD-ROM of the Biblioteca Virtual de Recursos Hídricos en América Latina y el Caribe, GWP-SAMTAC, United Nations Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago.
10.
BulkeleyH., 2010, “Cities and the governing of climate change”Annual Review of Environment and Resources35229–253.
11.
BulkeleyH.SchroederH.JandaK.ZhaoJ.ArmstrongA.ChuS.GhoshS., 2009, “Cities and climate change: The role of institutions, governance and urban planning”, report prepared for the World Bank Urban Symposium on Climate Change, University of Oxford.
12.
BurchS.RobinsonJ., 2007, “A framework for explaining the links between capacity and action in response to global climate change”Climate Policy7304–316.
13.
CarminJ.AnguelovskiI.RobertsD., 2012a, “Urban climate adaptation in the Global South planning in an emerging policy domain”Journal of Planning Education and Research3218–32.
14.
CarminJ.NadkarniN.RhieC., 2012bProgress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
15.
CEPAL, 2009, “La Economica del Cambio Climatico en Chile”, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago.
16.
ConnollyP., 2009, “Observing the evolution of irregular settlements: Mexico City's colonias populares, 1990 to 2005”International Development Planning Review311–35.
17.
Corfee-MorlotJ.Kamal-ChaouiL.RobertA.TeasdaleP-J, 2009Cities, Climate Change and Multilevel Governance (OECD, Paris).
18.
CorkalD.DiazH.GauthierD., 2006, “Governance and adaptation to climate change: The cases of Chile and Canada”, Institutional Adaptation to Climate Change Project, http://www.parc.ca/mcri/dissemination2006.php.
19.
EbertA.WelzJ.HeinrichsD.KrellenbergK.HansjürgensB., 2010, “Socio-environmental change and flood risks: The case of Santiago de Chile”Erdkunde64303–313.
20.
EngleN.LemosM., 2010, “Unpacking governance: Building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil”Global Environmental Change204–13.
21.
EnlilZ., 2011, “The neoliberal agenda and the changing urban form of Istanbul”International Planning Studies165–25.
22.
FewR.BrownK.TompkinsE., 2007, “Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion”Climate Policy746–59.
23.
GarfinG.Romero-LankaoP.VaradyR., 2013, “Rethinking integrated assessments and management projects in the Americas”Environmental Science and Policy261–5.
24.
GarreaudR.RutllantJ., 2006, “Meteorological factors of air pollution in Santiago”, in Critical Episodes of Air Pollution in Santiago Ed. MoralesR. (Editorial Universitaria, Santiago) pp 36–53.
25.
GDF, 2007Programa General de Desarrollo del Distrito Federal 2007–2012Gobierno del Distrito Federal, http://www.finanzas.df.gob.mx/.
26.
GDF, 2008, “Programa de Acción Climática de la Ciudad de México 2008–2012”, Gobierno del Distrito Federal, Mexico City.
27.
HardoyJ.Romero-LankaoP., 2011, “Latin American cities and climate change: Challenges and options to mitigation and adaptation responses”Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability3158–163.
28.
HeinrichsD.NuisslH.Rodríguez SeegerC., 2009, “Dispersion urbana y nuevos desafios para la governanza (metropolitan) en America Latina: El caso de Santiago de Chile”EURE35(104) 29–46.
29.
HidalgoR.ZuninoH M, 2011, “La urbanización de las áreas periféricas en Santiago y Valparaíso: El papel de las relaciones de poder en el dibujo de la geografía socioresidencial”EURE37(111) 79–105.
30.
HomedesN.UgaldeA., 2005, “Why neoliberal health reforms have failed in Latin America”Health Policy7183–96.
31.
HoornwegD.SugarL.GomezC L T, 2011, “Cities and greenhouse gas emissions: Moving forward”Environment and Urbanization23207–227.
InnesJ EBooherD E, 2004, “Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century”Planning Theory and Practice5419–436.
34.
JaureguiE.TejedaA., 2001, “A scenario of human thermal comfort in Mexico City for CO2 conditions”Atmosfera14125–138.
35.
JordanR.RehnerJ.SamaniegoJ., 2010, “Regional panorama. Latin America: Megacities and sustainability”, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago.
36.
KleinR.HuqS.DentonF.DowningT.RichelsR.RobinsonJ.TothF., 2007, “Interrelationships between adaptation and mitigation”, in Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Eds ParryM LCanzianiO FPalutikofJ PVan der LindenP JHansonC E, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 745–777.
37.
KoontzT.JohnsonE. Moore, 2004, “One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments”Policy Sciences37185–204.
38.
KrellenbergK.HeinrichsD.BartonJ., 2010, “Climate change and adaptation strategies in Latin American city-regions: The case of Santiago de Chile”UGEC Viewpoints34–7.
39.
LeonC.NeriC., 2010, “Study on climate change, disaster risk management and the urban poor: Mexico City case study”, unpublished report, World Bank Global Development Finance, World Bank, Washington, DC.
40.
MagañaV., 2010, “Estudio de vulnerabilidad diferenciada ante eventos extremos del clima en la zona metropolitan de la ciudad de México: Aspectos climáticos”, in Study on Climate Change, Disaster Risk Management and the Urban Poor Mexico City Case Study Eds LeonC.NeriC. (World Bank, Washington, DC) pp 72–114.
41.
MagrinG.GayC.ChoqueC.JiménezD.MorenoJ.NagyA.NobreG.VillamizarC., 2007, “Latin America”, in Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Eds ParryM LCanzianiO FPalutikofJ PVan der LindenP JHansonC E, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 581–615.
42.
MartínezL., 1999, “Las inundaciones en Santiago de Chile durante el invierno de 1877”, Anales del Instituto de Ingeniería de Chile, Santiago.
43.
MeashamT GPrestonB LSmithT FBrookeC.GorddardR.WithycombeG.MorrisonC., 2011, “Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: Barriers and challenges”Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change16889–909.
MolinaM.MolinaL., 2002Air Quality in the Mexico Megacity: An Integrated Assessment (Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam).
46.
MoserS CEkstromJ A, 2010, “A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences10722026–22031.
MukheibirP.ZiervogelG., 2007, “Developing a Municipal Adaptation Plan (MAP) for climate change: The city of Cape Town”Environment and Urbanization19143–158.
49.
MullinM., 2009Governing the Tap: Special District Governance and the New Local Politics of Water (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
50.
NaessL.BangG.EriksenS.VevatneJ., 2005, “Institutional adaptation to climate change: Flood responses at the municipal level in Norway”Global Environmental Change15125–138.
51.
OCDE, 2005Evaluaciones de desempeño ambiental, ChileOrganización de Cooperación y Desarrollo Económicos (OECD, Paris).
52.
OstromE., 1990Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
53.
OstromE.JanssenM AAnderiesJ M, 2007, “Going beyond panaceas”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences10415176–15178.
54.
Pahl-WostlC., 2009, “A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level climate change: Process in resource governance regimes”Global Environmental Change19354–365.
55.
BushV. PartidaAnzaldo GómezC., 2009, “Escenarios demográficos y urbanos de la zona metropolitana del valle de México”, http://www.conopo.gb.mx/publicaciones.
56.
PattA.SchroterD., 2008, “Perceptions of climate risk in Mozambique: Implications for the success of adaptation strategies”Global Environmental Change18458–467.
57.
PellingM.Manuel-NavarreteD., 2011, “From resilience to transformation: The adaptive cycle in two Mexican urban centers”Ecology and Society16(2):111–11.
58.
PochatV., 2005, “Entidades de gestión del agua a nivel de cuencas: Experiencia de Argentina”, División de Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Santiago de Chile.
59.
RaadgeverG.MostertE.KranzN.InterwiesE.TimmermanJ., 2008, “Assessing management regimes in transboundary river basins: Do they support adaptive management”Ecology and Society13(1):141–21.
60.
RabeB., 2004Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Evolving Politics of American Climate Change Policy (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).
61.
Romero-LankaoP., 2007a, “Are we missing the point? Particularities of urbanization, sustainability and carbon emissions in Latin American cities”Environment and Urbanization19157–175.
62.
Romero-LankaoP., 2007b, “How do local governments in Mexico City manage global warming?”Local Environment12519–535.
63.
Romero-LankaoP., 2010, “Water in Mexico City: What will climate change bring to its history of water-related hazards and vulnerabilities?”Environment and Urbanization22157–178.
64.
Romero-LankaoP.DodmanD., 2011, “Cities in transition: Transforming urban centers from hotbeds of GHG emissions and vulnerability to seedbeds of sustainability and resilience”Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability3113–120.
65.
Romero-LankaoP.GüntherG., 2011, “Missing the multiple dimensions of water? Neoliberal modernization in Mexico City and Buenos Aires”Policy and Society: Journal of Public, Foreign and Global Policy30267–283.
66.
HuertaA. Rosas, 2011, “La capacidad administrative del gobierno del Distrito Federal y el cambio climático”Política y cultura36177–203.
67.
SatterthwaiteD.HuqS.ReidH.PellingM.Romero-LankaoP., 2007, “Adapting to climate change in urban areas: The possibilities and constraints in low-and middle-income nations”, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
68.
SEMARNAT, 2007, “Mexico's Third National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Mexico City.
69.
TolbertP., 1985, “Institutional environments and resource dependence: Sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher education”Administrative Science Quarterly301–13.
70.
TompkinsE LAdgerN W, 2005, “Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy”Environmental Science and Policy8562–571.
71.
University of Chile, 2006, “Estudio de la variabilidad climática en Chile para el siglo XXI”, study for the Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente, Department of Geophysics, University of Chile, Santiago.
72.
UrpelainenJ., 2009, “Explaining the Schwarzenegger phenomenon: Local frontrunners in climate policy”Global Environmental Politics982–105.
73.
WigleJ., 2010, “‘The Xochimilco model’ for managing irregular settlements in conservation land in Mexico City”Cities27337–347.
74.
YoheG., 2001, “Mitigative capacity: The mirror image of adaptive capacity on the emissions side”Climatic Change49247–262.
75.
YoheG.TolR S, 2002, “Indicators for social and economic coping capacity—moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity”Global Environmental Change1225–40.
76.
ZuninoH., 2006, “Power relations in urban decision-making: Neo-liberalism, ‘techno-politicians’ and authoritarian redevelopment in Santiago, Chile”Urban Studies431825–1846.
