This paper highlights planning interventions in countries that have implemented successful greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policies while continuing to increase per capita GDP. Screening and reviewing all countries in the world, with this research I have identified nine countries that have steadily decoupled per capita carbon emissions from GDP. GHG emission profiles and pertinent policies from national case studies demonstrate the built environment sectors most responsive (waste, residential, land-use change, and forestry) and least responsive (transportation) to GHG reduction policies without import substitution. A comparison amongst case-study countries and theoretical models indicates the best opportunities for targeting GHG reductions.
AngelSSheppardS CCivcoD LBuckleyRChabaevaAGitlinLKraleyAParentJPerlinM, 2005The Dynamics of Global Urban Expansion. September, Transport and Urban Development Department, The World Bank, Washington, DC
2.
AslanidisNIranzoS, 2009, “Environment and development: is there a Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions?”Applied Economics41803–810
3.
AzarCBerndesG, 1999, “The implication of CO2-abatement policies on food prices”, in Sustainable Agriculture and Environment: Globalisation and Trade Liberalization Impacts Eds DragunATisdellC (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 26–32
4.
BrezziMPiacentiniMRosinaK, 2012, “Redefining urban areas in OECD countries”, in Redefining ‘Urban’: A New Way to Measure Metropolitan Areas (OECD Publishing, Paris) pp 19–58
5.
CITEPA, 2012, Centre Interprofessionnel Technique d'Etudes de la Pollution Atmosphérique, http://CITEPA.org
6.
CO2 Act, 2000Swiss Federal CO2Emission Reduction Act. Authorities of the Swiss Confederation, Berne
7.
ColeLFosterS, 2000From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement (New York University Press, New York)
8.
CoondooDDindaS, 2002, “Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis”Ecological Economics40351–367
9.
DanielsTDanielsK, 2003The Environmental Planning Handbook for Sustainable Communities and Regions (American Planning Association Planners Press, Chicago, IL)
10.
DavisS JCaldeiraK, 2010, “Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA1075687–5692
11.
DavisS JPetersG PCaldeiraK, 2011, “The supply chain of CO2 emissions”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA10818554–18559
12.
DindaSCoondooD, 2006, “Income and emission: a panel-data based cointegration analysis”Ecological Economics57167–181
13.
DulalH BBrodnigGOnorioseC G, 2011, “Climate change mitigation in the transport sector through urban planning: a review”Habitat International35494–500
GraziFvan den BerghJ C J M, 2008, “Spatial organization, transport, and climate change:comparing instruments of spatial planning and policy”Ecological Economics67630–639
20.
HallegatteSHenrietFCorfee-MorlotJ, 2011, “The economics of climate change impacts and policy benefits at city scale: a conceptual framework”Climatic Change10451–87
21.
HertwichE GPetersG P, 2009, “Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis”Environmental Science and Technology436414–6420
HoffertM, 2010, “Farewell to fossil fuels?”Science329(5997) 1292–1294
24.
IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change2001Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
PacalaSSocolowR, 2004, “Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies”Science305968–972
28.
PetersG PHertwichE G, 2008, “CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy”Environmental Science and Technology421401–1407
RaupachM RMarlandGCiaisPLe QuereCCanadellJ GKlepperGFieldC B, 2007, “Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA10410288–10293
31.
SheppardS, 2011, “Measuring and modeling global urban expansion”, in Global Urbanization. Eds BirchEWachterS M (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 107–125
32.
SteinbergerJ KRobertsJ TPetersG PBaiocchiG, 2012, “Pathways of human development and carbon emissions embodied in trade”Nature Climate Change281–85
33.
SternN, 2006Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
34.
UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn
35.
2009a, “Belgium's Fifth National Communication on Climate Change under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol”, http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/belnc5.pdf
36.
2009b, “Denmark's Fifth National Communication on Climate Change under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol”, http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/dnk_nc5rev.pdf
37.
2009c, “France's Fifth National Communication on Climate Change under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol”, http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/franc5abs.pdf
38.
2009d, “Hungary's Fifth National Communication on Climate Change under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol”, http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/hun_nc5.pdf
39.
2009e, “Sweden's Fifth National Communication on Climate Change under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol”, http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/swe_nc5.pdf
40.
2009f, “Switzerland's Fifth National Communication on Climate Change under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol”, http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/che_nc5.pdf
VijayavenkataramanSIniyanSGoicR, 2012, “A review of climate change, mitigation and adaptation”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews16878–897
44.
WCED, 1987Our Common Future World Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
45.
WilliamsJ HDeBenedictisAGhanadanRMahoneAMooreJMorrowW RPriceSTornM S, 2012, “The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: the pivotal role of electricity”Science335(6064) 53–59
