A close examination of venues for participatory environmental governance reveals highly constrained settings for citizen engagement. This situation is documented within the broader social milieu by Skocpol as a narrowing of public life which is characterized in this paper by professional, stakeholder, and elitist forms of participatory environmental governance. Case-study evidence is presented from three different governance settings in Canada (environmental assessment, land-use planning, and forest management) identifying two distinct types of elitism: elite representation by design and elite representation by procedure. Two options are presented as a response to this analysis. One option involves accepting elitism by strengthening the linkages between stakeholders and constituencies, and the other option involves fighting elitism by drawing on modes of community-based decision, deliberative activism, and promoting research that highlights the consequences of environmental elitism.
ArmitageD R, 2005, “Collaborative environmental assessment in the Northwest Territories, Canada”Environmental Impact Assessment Review25239–258
2.
ArmitageD RBerkesFDoubledayN (Eds), 2007Adaptive Co-management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-level Governance (University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC)
3.
BäckstrandK, 2003, “Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance”Global Environmental Politics324–41
4.
BeckleyT MParkinsJ RSheppardS R J, 2006, “Public participation in sustainable forest management: a reference guide to best practices”, Sustainable Forest Management Network, Edmonton, AB, http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id=26206
5.
BerkesF, 2010, “Devolution of environmental and resources governance: trends and future”Environmental Conservation37489–500
6.
BerkesFColdingJFolkeC (Eds), 2003Navigating Social-ecological Systems (Cambridge University Press, New York)
7.
BinghamL BNabatchiTO'LearyR, 2005, “The new governance: practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government”Public Administration Review65547–558
8.
CarsGHealeyPMadanipourADe MagalhaesC (Eds), 2002Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
9.
CashoreBAuldGNewsomD, 2004Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
10.
ChambersS, 2003, “Deliberative democratic theory”Annual Review of Political Science6307–326
11.
CôtéM ABoutillierL, 1999, “Analysis of the relationship among stakeholders affected by sustainable forest management and forest certification”The Forestry Chronicle75961–965
12.
DanielsS E, 2009, “Exploring the feasibility of mediated final offer arbitration as a technique for managing ‘gridlocked’ environmental conflict”Society and Natural Resources22261–277
13.
DiduckA PSinclairA J, 1997, “The concept of critical environmental assessment education”The Canadian Geographer41294–307
14.
DoelleMSinclairA J, 2006, “Time for a new approach to environmental assessments: promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability”Environmental Impact Assessment Review26185–205
15.
DoelleMSinclairA J, 2010, “Mediation in environmental assessment in Canada: unfulfilled promise?”Dalhousie Law Journal33117–152
16.
DryzekJ S, 2000Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford University Press, New York)
17.
DurantDFuji JohnsonG (Eds), 2009Nuclear Waste Management in Canada: Critical Issues, Critical Perspectives (University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC)
EppR, 2001, “The political deskilling of rural communities”, in Writing Off the Rural West: Globalization, Governments and the Transformation of Rural Communities Eds EppRWhitsonD (University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, AB) pp 301–324
20.
FolkeCHahnTOlssonPNorbergJ, 2005, “Adaptive governance of social—ecological systems”Annual Review of Environment and Resources30441–473
21.
GallagherT JPatrick-RileyK, 1989, “The readability of federal land management plans”Environmental Management1385–90
22.
GibsonR B, 2012, “In full retreat: the Canadian government's new environmental assessment law undoes decades of progress”Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal30179–188
23.
GlasbergenP (Ed.), 1998Co-operative Environmental Governance: Public—private Agreements as a Policy Strategy (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA)
GulbrandsenL H, 2004, “Overlapping public and private governance: can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime?”Global Environmental Politics475–99
27.
GundersonL HHollingC S, 2001Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature (Island Press, Washington, DC)
28.
Haluza-DeLayR B, 2008, “A theory of practice for social movements: environmentalism and ecological habitus”Mobilization13205–218
29.
IrwinAJensenT EJonesK E, 2012, “The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice”Social Studies of Science43118–135
30.
JessopB, 1999, “Narrating the future of the national economy and the national state: remarks on remapping regulation and reinventing governance”, in State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn Ed. SteinmetzG (Cornell, Ithaca, NY) pp 378–405
31.
JessopB, 2002Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety, and Requisite Irony. Department of Sociology, Lancaster University
32.
KaspersonR, 2006, “Rerouting the stakeholder express”Global Environmental Change16320–322
33.
KeenMMahantyS, 2006, “Learning in sustainable natural resource management: challenges and opportunities in the Pacific”Society and Natural Resources19497–513
KooimanJBavinckMJentoftSPulinR (Eds), 2005Fish for Life: Interactive 726 Governance for Fisheries (Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam)
36.
LudwigDHilbornRWatersC, 1993, “Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history”Science510417–36
37.
McCloskeyM, 1996, “The skeptics: collaboration has its limits”High Country News28(9) 7
38.
McGurkBSinclairA JDiduckA P, 2006, “An assessment of stakeholder advisory committees in forest management: case studies from Manitoba, Canada”Society and Natural Resources19809–826
MansbridgeJBohmanJChambersSEstlundDFøllesdalAFungALafontCManinBMartíJ, 2010, “The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy”The Journal of Political Philosophy1864–100
41.
MeadowcroftJ, 1998, “Co-operative management regions: a way forward?”, in Co-operative Environmental Governance: Public—private Agreements as a Policy Strategy Ed. GlasbergenP (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA) pp 21–42
42.
MeredithT, 1992, “Environmental impact assessment, cultural diversity and sustainable rural development”EIA Review12125–138
43.
MillerC, 2001Gifford Pinchot and the Making of Modern Environmentalism (Island Press, Washington, DC)
44.
MitchellB (Ed.), 2004Resource and Environmental Management in Canada: Addressing Conflict and Uncertainty3rd edition (Oxford University Press, Toronto, ON)
45.
NEB, no date, “Information bulletin number IV: how to participate in a public hearing”, 2005 NEB Substitution under the CEA Act: Discussion Paper, National Energy Board, Calgary, AB
46.
NeefjesK, 2000Environments and Livelihoods: Strategies for Sustainability. Oxfam, London
47.
NeefjesK, 2001, “Learning from participatory environmental impact assessment of community centred development: the Oxfam experience”, in Analytical Issues in Natural Resources Management Eds ViraBJefferyR (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 111–125
48.
ParkinsJ R, 2006, “De-centering environmental governance: a short history and analysis of democratic processes in the forest sector of Alberta, Canada”Policy Sciences39183–203
49.
ParkinsJ R, 2011, “Deliberative democracy, institution building and the pragmatics of cumulative effects assessment”Ecology and Society16(3) 20
50.
ParkinsJ RMitchellR E, 2005, “Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management”Society and Natural Resources18529–540
51.
ParkinsJ RHuntLNadeauSReedMSinclairJWallaceS, 2006Public Participation in Forest Management: Results from a National Survey of Advisory Committees Northern Forestry Centre NOR-X-409, Natural Resource Canada, Edmonton, AB, http://nofc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/bookstore_pdfs/26570.pdf
52.
PellizzoniL, 2004, “Responsibility and environmental governance”Environmental Politics13541–565
53.
PinkertonEHeaslipRSilverJ JFurmanK, 2008, “Finding ‘space’ for comanagement of forests within the neoliberal paradigm: rights, strategies, and tools for asserting a local agenda”Human Ecology36343–355
54.
PoitrasJRenaudP, 1997Mediation and Reconciliation of Interests in Public Disputes (Carswell, Toronto, ON)
55.
PutnamR, 2000Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, Toronto, ON)
56.
ReedM, 2007, “Seeking red herrings in the wood: tending the shared spaces of environmental and feminist geographies”The Canadian Geographer511–21
57.
RostbøllC F, 2009, “Dissent, criticism, and transformative political action in deliberative democracy”Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy1219–36
58.
RoweGFrewerL J, 2000, “Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation”Science Technology and Human Values253–29
59.
SandilandsC, 1997, “Is the personal always political? Environmentalism in Arendt's age of ‘the social’”, in Organizing Dissent: Contemporary Social Movements in Theory and Practice Ed. CarrollW (Garamond Press, Toronto, ON) pp 76–93
60.
SchneiderGSinclairA JMitchellL, 2007Environmental Assessment Process Substitution: A Participant's View. Canadian Environment Network, Ottawa, ON
61.
SeagerJ, 1996, “Hysterical housewives and other mad women: grassroots environmental organizations in the United States”, in Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experience Eds RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE (Routledge, New York) pp 271–286
62.
SheppardS R JMeitnerM, 2005, “Using multi-criteria analysis and visualization for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups”Forest Ecology and Management207171–187
63.
SherpaY, 2012, “Public participation in tourism development: a case study of the Himalayan Ski Village project in Manali, India”, Master's dissertation, Natural Resources Management, Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, http://umanitoba.ca/institutes/natural_resources/
64.
ShindlerBNeburkaJ, 1997, “Public participation in forest planning: 8 attributes of success”Journal of Forestry9517–19
65.
SimsLSinclairA J, 2008, “Learning through participatory resource management programmes: case studies from Costa Rica”Adult Education Quarterly58151–168
66.
SinclairA JDiduckA P, 2009, “Public participation in Canadian environmental assessment: enduring challenges and future directions”, in Environmental Impact Assessment Process and Practices in Canada Ed. HannaK S (Oxford University Press, Toronto, ON) pp 56–82
67.
SinclairA JDoelleM, 2010, “Environmental assessment in Canada: encouraging decisions for sustainability”, in Resource and Environmental Management in Canada: Addressing Conflict and Uncertainty4th edition, Ed. MitchellB (Oxford University Press, Toronto, ON) pp 462–495
68.
SinclairA JDiduckA PFitzpatrickP J, 2008, “Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: critical reflections on 15 years of research”Environmental Impact Assessment Review28415–522
69.
SinclairA JSimsLSpalingH, 2009, “Community-based approaches to strategic environmental assessment: lessons from Costa Rica”Environmental Impact Assessment Review29147–156
70.
SinclairA JSchneiderGMitchellL, 2012, “Environmental impact assessment substitution: experiences of public participants”Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal3085–94
SkocpolT, 2004b, “Voice and inequality: the transformation of American civic democracy”American Political Science Association23–20
73.
SmithP DMcDonoughM H, 2001, “Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision making”Society and Natural Resources14239–241
74.
SpalingH, 2003, “Innovations in environmental assessment of community-based projects in Africa”The Canadian Geographer47151–168
75.
TurnpennyJLorenzoniIJonesM, 2009, “Noisy and definitely not normal: responding to wicked issues in the environment, energy and health”Environmental Science and Policy12347–358
