Possible transient-system deficiencies in subjects with specific reading disabilities (SRDs) were investigated in groups of 13-year-old SRDs and control normal readers. In experiment 1, in which a 6 Hz uniform-field flicker (UFF) mask and a stationary test stimulus were used, it was found that the overall effect of UFF masking was to reduce differences in contrast sensitivity between SRDs and normal readers. In experiments 2a and 2b, with UFF masks of 6 and 20 Hz and a 6 Hz moving (experiment 2a) or flickering (experiment 2b) test stimulus, contrast sensitivity in both groups was decreased in the presence of the 6 Hz UFF mask. Only the control group, however, showed a further decrease in sensitivity with the 20 Hz UFF mask. This indicates that the groups differ in terms of a mechanism sensitive to high temporal frequencies. A 20 Hz counterphase flickering test stimulus was used in experiment 3 in the presence of 6 Hz UFF, and it was found that SRDs are less sensitive than controls to 20 Hz flicker across all spatial frequencies used. The 6 Hz mask, however, did not differentially affect the two groups. These findings provide further evidence for a transient-system deficit in the visual systems of SRDs, but also suggest a more complex situation by showing that the two groups differ in a high-temporal-frequency mechanism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonSBurrD, 1985“Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detection system”Vision Research251147–1154
2.
BadcockDLovegroveW, 1981“The effects of contrast, stimulus duration and spatial frequency on visible persistence in normal specifically disabled readers”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance7495–505
3.
BlaxallJWillowsD, 1984“Reading ability and text difficulty as influences on second graders' oral reading errors”Journal of Educational Psychology76330–341
4.
Bodis-WollnerI, 1972“Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patients with cerebral lesions”Science178769–771
5.
Bodis-WollnerIHendleyC, 1979“On the separability of two mechanisms involved in the detection of grating patterns in humans”Journal of Physiology (London)291251–263
6.
BowlingALovegroveW JMappersonB, 1979“The effect of spatial frequency and contrast on visual persistence”Perception8529–539
7.
BrannanJ RWilliamsM C, 1988“The effects of age and reading ability on flicker threshold” in Clinical Visual Sciences in press
8.
BreitmeyerB G, 1978“Disinhibition in metacontrast masking of vernier acuity targets: Sustained channels inhibit transient channels”Vision Research181401–1405
9.
BreitmeyerB G, 1980“Unmasking visual masking: A look at the ‘why’ behind the veil of ‘how”’Psychological Review8752–69
10.
BreitmeyerB GGanzL, 1976“Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression and information processing”Psychological Review831–36
11.
BreitmeyerBLeviD MHarwerthR S, 1981“Flicker masking in spatial vision”Vision Research211377–1385
12.
ColtheartM, 1980“Iconic memory and visible persistence”Perception & Psychophysics27183–228
13.
DerringtonA MHenningB, 1981“Pattern discrimination with flickering stimuli”Vision Research21597–602
14.
FletcherJSatzP, 1979“Unitary hypotheses of reading disabilities”Journal of Learning Disabilities12155–159
15.
GeorgesonM A, 1976“Antagonism between channels for pattern and movement in human vision”Nature (London)259413–415
16.
GeorgesonM AGeorgesonS, 1985“On seeing temporal gaps between gratings: A criterion problem for measurement of visible persistence”Vision Research151729–1733
17.
GreenM, 1981“Psychophysical relationships among mechanisms sensitive to pattern, motion and flicker”Vision Research21971–983
18.
GreenM, 1984“Masking by light and the sustained — transient dichotomy”Perception & Psychophysics35519–535
19.
HulmeC, 1988“The implausibility of low-level visual deficits as a cause of children's reading disabilities” in Cognitive Neuropsychology in press
20.
KulikowskiJ JTolhurstD J, 1973“Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision”Journal of Physiology (London)232149–162
21.
LeggeG E, 1978“Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties”Vision Research1869–81
22.
LennieP, 1980“Parallel visual pathways: A review”Vision Research20561–594
23.
LovegroveW J, 1988“The implausibility of low-level visual deficits as a cause of children's reading difficulties: A rejoinder” submitted for publication
24.
LovegroveW JBowlingABadcockDBlackwoodM, 1980a“Specific reading disability: Differences in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency”Science210439–440
25.
LovegroveW JHeddleMSlaghuisW L, 1980b“Reading disability: Spatial frequency specific deficits in visual information store”Neuropsychologia18111–115
26.
LovegroveW JMartinFBowlingABlackwoodMBadcockDPaxtonS, 1982“Contrast sensitivity functions and specific reading disability”Neuropsychologia20309–315
27.
MartinFLovegroveW J, 1984“The effects of field size and luminance on contrast sensitivity differences between specifically reading disabled and normal children”Neuropsychologia2273–77
28.
MartinFLovegroveW J, 1987“Flicker contrast sensitivity in normal and specifically disabled readers”Perception16215–221
29.
MecacciLSechiELeviS, 1983“Abnormalities of visual evoked potentials by checkerboards in children with specific reading disability”Brain and Cognition2135–143
30.
NealeM D, 1966The Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (London: Macmillan)
31.
PantleA J, 1983“Temporal determinants of spatial sine-wave masking”Vision Research23749–765
32.
RavenJ C, 1938Standard Progressive Matrices (Hawthorne, Australia: Australian Council for Education Research, ACER)
33.
ReganDSilverRMurrayT J, 1977“Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis—hidden visual loss”Brain100563–579
34.
SingerWBedworthN, 1973“Inhibitory interaction between x and y units in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus”Brain Research49291–307
35.
SlaghuisW LLovegroveW, 1984“Flicker masking of spatial-frequency-dependent visible persistence and specific reading disability”Perception13527–534
36.
SmithA TEarlyFGroganS, 1986“Flicker masking and developmental dyslexia”Perception15473–482
37.
TolhurstD, 1975“Sustained and transient channels in human vision”Vision Research151151–1155
38.
VellutinoF R, 1978“Visual processing deficiencies in poor readers: A critique of traditional conceptualizations of the etiology of dyslexia” paper presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the International Reading Association, World Congress on Reading, Hamburg
39.
WetherillG BLevittH, 1965“Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology181–10
40.
WilliamsM CBolognaN, 1985“Perceptual grouping effects in good and bad readers”Perception & Psychophysics38367–374
41.
WilliamsM CBrannanJ BLartigueK E, 1987“Visual search in good and poor readers”Clinical Visual Sciences1367–371
42.
WillowsDKershnerJCorcosE, 1986“Visual processing and visual memory in reading and writing disability? A rationale for reopening a closed case” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco
