It is recognized that a fundamental role in the perception of anomalous figures is played by the intensity and shape of brightness modifications induced by line ends. The aim of this work was to study the structure of these modifications experimentally, by using variously arranged dots as probes. It was thus assumed that dots can measure activations generated inside abrupt line ends. The results show distribution of activation which differs according to dot distance and angle with respect to the continuation of the line near its end. These data do not agree with the predictions of information processing models in the literature on anomalous figures, which are based on perceptually postulated figures accounting for unlikely gaps. However, they do agree with the dynamic model proposed here, which is based on the idea that certain figure characteristics, eg the differential brightness of anomalous figures, depend on activation distribution which in turn depends on the organization of the forces in play. This idea is rooted in Gestalt theory. Another model supported by our experimental data is Grossberg's neural dynamic approach. In this case too, the basic idea is that of activation distribution which depends on the interaction of complex neural networks functioning according to special algorithms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrandeisD ULehmannDMuellerR U, 1985“Late E P negativity and perception of Kanizsa triangle”Biological Psychiatry20192–193
2.
BrignerW LGallagherM B, 1974“Subjective contour: Apparent depth or simultaneous brightness contrast?”Perception and Motor Skills381047–1053
3.
CohenM AGrossbergS, 1984“Neural dynamics of brightness perception: Features, boundaries, diffusion, and resonance”Perception & Psychophysics36428–456
4.
CorenS, 1972“Subjective contour and apparent depth”Psychological Review79359–367
5.
DayR HJoryM K, 1978“Subjective contours, visual acuity, and line contrast” in Visual Psychophysics: Its Physiological Basis Eds ArmingtonJ CKrauskopfJ EWootenB R (New York: Academic Press) pp 331–340
GregoryR L, 1985“Illusory surfaces as perceptual postulates”, paper presented at the International Conference on Illusory Contours, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, November
10.
GregoryR L, 1987“Illusory contours and occluding surfaces” in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer) pp 81–89
11.
GrossbergS, 1984“Outline of a theory of brightness, color, and form perception” in Trends in Mathematical Psychology Eds DegreefEVan BuggenhautJ (Amsterdam: North-Holland)
12.
GrossbergSMingollaE, 1985a“Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading”Psychological Review92173–211
13.
GrossbergSMingollaE, 1985b“Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations”Perception & Psychophysics38141–171
14.
GrossbergSMingollaE, 1987“The role of illusory contours in visual segmentation” in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer) pp 116–124
15.
HammondPMacKayD M, 1977“Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture”Experimental Brain Research30275–296
16.
von der HeydtRPeterhansEBaumgartnerG, 1984“Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses”Science2241260–1261
17.
JeffreysD AMusselwhiteM J, 1984“Contour detecting processes in human visual cortex”Perception13225–236
18.
JoryM KDayR H, 1979“The relationship between brightness contrast and illusory contours”Perception83–9
19.
KanizsaG, 1954“Il gradiente marginale come fattore dell'aspetto fenomenico dei colori”Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria15251–264
20.
KanizsaG, 1955“Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea”Rivista di Psicologia497–30
21.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision (New York: Praeger)
22.
KennedyJ M, 1978“Illusory contours not due to completion”Perception7187–189
23.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt)
24.
KöhlerW, 1920Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand (Brunswick: Vieweg)
25.
KöhlerW, 1940Dynamics in Psychology (New York: Liveright)
26.
LiebmannS, 1927“Über das Verhalten farbiger Formen bei Helligkeitsgleichheit von Figure und Grund”Psychologische Forschung95–60
27.
MetzgerW, 1975Gesetze des Sehense (Frankfurt am Main: Kramer)
28.
MinguzziG, 1982“Figure anomale: Le modificazioni di chiarezza indotte dalla fine di linee”, reports of the Institute of Psychology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
29.
MinguzziG, 1983“La percezione di superfici anomale”Ricerche di Psicologia2697–118
30.
MinguzziG, 1987“Anomalous figures and the tendency to continuation” in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer-Verlag) pp 71–74
31.
MusattiC, 1953“Ricerche sperimentali sopra la percezione cromatica”Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria14541–577
32.
PinnaB, 1987“Un effetto di colorazione” in XXI Congresso degli Psicologi Italiani ‘Il Laboratorio e la Città’ Venezia pp 158–159
33.
PinnaBDaviMSambinM, 1989“Il completamento amodale da un punto di vista dinamico”, paper presented at the VIII National Conference of the Italian Society of Psychology, Trieste, Italy
34.
RediesCCrookJ MCreutzfeldtO D, 1986“Neuronal responses to border with and without luminance gradients in cat visual cortex and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus”Experimental Brain Research61469–481
35.
RockI, 1987“A problem-solving approach to illusory contours” in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer-Verlag) pp 62–69
SambinM, 1975“The role of terminal tensions in the organization of margins without gradient”Italian Journal of Psychology2239–257
38.
SambinM, 1987“A dynamic model of anomalous figures” in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer-Verlag) pp 131–142
39.
SambinMPinnaB, 1987“Costrutti ipotetici nella spiegazione del fenomeno figure-sfondo” in Giornate di studio in Ricordo di Fabio Metelli Università di Padova Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale (Padova, Italy: Università di Padova) pp 144–163
40.
SambinMPinnaB, 1989“Constructos hipotéticos en la explicación del fenómeno figura-fondo”Revista de Psicologia General y Aplicada42(2) 155–164
41.
SmithA TOverR, 1975“Tilt aftereffects with subjective contours”Nature (London)257581–582
42.
SmithA TOverR, 1976“Color-selective tilt aftereffects with subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics20305–308
43.
SmithA TOverR, 1977“Orientation masking and tilt illusion with subjective contours”Perception6441–447
44.
SpillmannL, 1975“Perceptual modification of the Ehrenstein illusion” in Gestalt Theorie in der modernen Psychologie Eds ErtelSKemmlerLStadlerM (Darmstadt: Steinfopff) pp 210–218
45.
StadlerMDiekerJ, 1972“Untersuchungen zum Problem virtueller Konturen in der visuellen Wahrnehmung”Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie19325–350
46.
WertheimerM, 1923“Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt”Psychologische Forschung4301–350
