The adaptation to inverting prisms and mirror spectacles was studied in four subjects over periods of six to ten days. Subjects showed rapid adaptation of visuomotor functions, but did not report return of upright vision. The persistence of the transformed visual image was confirmed by the subjects' perception of shape from shading. No alteration of the retinotopy of early visual cortical areas was seen in the functional magnetic resonance images. These results are discussed in the context of previous claims of upright vision with inverting prisms and mirror spectacles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClowerD MHoffmanJ MVotawJ RFaberT LWoodsR PAlexanderG E, 1996“Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching”Nature (London)383618–621
2.
ColbyC L, 1998“Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex”Neuron2015–24
3.
FiorentiniAGhezCMaffeiL, 1972“Physiological correlates of adaptation to a rotated visual field”Journal of Physiology (London)227313–322
4.
GoebelRKhorram-SefatDMuckliLHackerHSingerW, 1998b“The constructive nature of vision: Direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery”European Journal of Neuroscience101563–1573
5.
GoebelRLindenD E JLanfermannHZanellaF ESingerW, 1998a“Functional imaging of mirror and inverse reading reveals separate coactivated networks for oculomotion and spatial transformations”Neuroreport9713–719
6.
GregoryR L, 1997Mirrors in Mind (New York: W H Freeman) pp 92–95
GregoryR L, 1998bEye and Brain. The Psychology of Seeingfifth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 138ff, p. 190
9.
HeldRFreedmanS J, 1963“Plasticity in human sensorimotor control”Science142455–462
10.
KleffnerD ARamachandranV S, 1992“On the perception of shape from shading”Perception & Psychophysics5218–36
11.
KohlerI, 1964The Formation and Transformation of the Perceptual World (New York: International Universities Press)
12.
KolersP A, 1968“The recognition of geometrically transformed text”Perception & Psychophysics357–64
13.
KolersP A, 1975“Memorial consequences of automatized encoding”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory104689–701
14.
KolersP A, 1976“Reading a year later”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory2554–565
15.
KottenhoffH, 1961Was ist richtiges Sehen mit Umkehrbrillen und in welchem Sinne stellt sich das Sehen um? (Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain)
16.
LindenD E J, 1998“Visual perception: Myths and mechanisms”Trends in Neurosciences21225–226
17.
LisbergerS GFuchsA F, 1978“Role of primate flocculus during rapid behavioral modification of vestibuloocular reflex. II. Mossy fiber firing patterns during horizontal head rotation and eye movement”Journal of Neurophysiology41764–777
18.
LisbergerS GPavelkoT ABroussardD M, 1994“Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. I. Changes in the responses of brain stem neurons”Journal of Neurophysiology72928–953
19.
JonesMelvill GGonshorA, 1982“Oculomotor response to rapid head oscillations (0.5–5.0 Hz) after prolonged adaptation to vision-reversal. ‘Simple’ and ‘complex’ effects”Experimental Brain Research4545–58
20.
JonesMelvill GGuittonDBerthozA, 1988“Changing patterns of eye–head coordination during 6 h of optically reversed vision”Experimental Brain Research69531–544
21.
PoldrackR ADesmondJ EGloverG HGabrieliJ D E, 1998“The neural basis of visual skill learning: An fMRI study of mirror reading”Cerebral Cortex81–10
22.
RamachandranV S, 1988“Perception of shape from shading”Nature (London)331163–166
23.
SerenoM IDaleA MReppasJ BKwongK KBelliveauJ WBradyT JRosenB RTootellR B, 1995“Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging”Science268889–893
24.
SingerWTretterFYinonU, 1979b“Inverted vision causes selective loss of striate cortex neurons with binocular, vertically oriented receptive fields”Brain Research170177–181
25.
SingerWTretterFYinonU, 1982a“Central gating of developmental plasticity in kitten visual cortex”Journal of Physiology (London)324221–237
26.
SingerWTretterFYinonU, 1982b“Evidence for long-term functional plasticity in the visual cortex of adult cats”Journal of Physiology (London)324239–248
27.
SingerWYinonUTretterF, 1979a“Inverted monocular vision prevents ocular dominance shifts in kittens and impairs the functional state of visual cortex in adult cats”Brain Research164294–299
28.
SnyderF WPronkoN H, 1952Vision with Spatial Inversion (Wichita, KS: University of Wichita Press)
29.
StrattonG M, 1896“Some preliminary experiments on vision without inversion of the retinal image”Psychological Review3611–617
30.
StrattonG M, 1897“Vision without inversion of the retinal image”Psychological Review4341–360, 463–481
31.
SugitaY, 1996“Global plasticity in adult visual cortex following reversal of visual input”Nature (London)380523–526
32.
TalairachJTournouxP, 1988Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain (Stuttgart: Thieme)
33.
TootellR BDaleA MSerenoM IMalachR, 1996“New images from human visual cortex”Trends in Neurosciences19481–489
34.
Van EssenD CDruryH A, 1997“Structural and functional analyses of human cerebral cortex using a surface-based atlas”Journal of Neuroscience177079–7102
35.
YinonU, 1982“Orientation disparity and plasticity of cortical cells in kittens following surgical rotation of the eye”Metabolic, Pediatric & Systemic Ophthalmology6237–250
36.
YoshimuraH, 1996“A historical review of long-term visual-transposition research in Japan”Psychological Research5916–32