We investigated whether infants from 8–22 weeks of age were sensitive to the illusory contour created by aligned line terminators. Previous reports of illusory-contour detection in infants under 4 months old could be due to infants' preference for the presence of terminators rather than their configuration. We generated preferential-looking stimuli containing sinusoidal lines whose oscillating, abutting terminators give a strong illusory contour in adult perception. Our experiments demonstrated a preference in infants 8 weeks old and above for an oscillating illusory contour compared with a stimulus containing equal terminator density and movement. Control experiments excluded local line density, or attention to alignment in general, as the basis for this result. In the youngest age group (8–10 weeks) stimulus velocity appears to be critical in determining the visibility of illusory contours, which is consistent with other data on motion processing at this age. We conclude that, by 2 months of age, the infant's visual system contains the nonlinear mechanisms necessary to extract an illusory contour from aligned terminators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrightT D, 1992“Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex”Science2551141–1143
2.
AndersenG JBraunsteinM L, 1983“Dynamic occlusion in the perception of rotation in depth”Perception & Psychophysics34356–362
3.
BertenthalB LCamposJ JHaithM M, 1980“Development of visual organization: The perception of subjective contours”Child Development511072–1080
4.
ChubbCMcGowanJSperlingGWerkhovenP, 1994“Non-Fourier motion analysis”Higher Order Processing in the Visual System: CIBA Foundation Symposium184193–210
5.
CorenS, 1972“Subjective contours and apparent depth”Psychological Review79359–367
6.
FellemanD JVan EssenD C, 1981“Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex”Cerebral Cortex11–47
7.
FrisbyJ P, 1980Seeing (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
8.
GhimH, 1990“Evidence for perceptual organization in infants: Perception of subjective contours by young infants”Infant Behavior and Development13221–248
9.
GranrudC EYonasASmithI AArterberryM EGlicksmanM LSorknesA C, 1984“Infants' sensitivity to accretion and deletion of texture as information for depth of an edge”Child Development551630–1636
GrosofD HShapleyMHawkenM J, 1993“Macaque V1 neurons can signal ‘illusory’ contours”Nature (London)365550–552
12.
GurnseyRvon GrünauM, 1997“Illusory contour-motion arising from translating terminators”Vision Research371007–1024
13.
von der HeydtRPeterhansE, 1989a“Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity”Journal of Neuroscience91731–1748
14.
von der HeydtRPeterhansE, 1989b“Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps”Journal of Neuroscience91749–1763
15.
von der HeydtRPeterhansEBaumgartnerM, 1984“Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses”Science2241260–1262
16.
HubelD MLivingstoneM S, 1985“Complex-unoriented cells in a subregion of primate area 18”Nature (London)315325–327
17.
JohnsonS P, 1995“Young infants' perception of surfaces in depth: Transparency, texture, and illusory contours”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science36(4) S910
18.
JohnsonS PAslinR N, 1998“Young infants' perception of illusory contours in dynamic displays”Perception27341–353
19.
JuleszBFrisbyJ P, 1975“Some new subjective contours in random-line stereograms”Perception4145–150
20.
KanizsaG, 1974“Contours without gradients or cognitive contours?”Italian Journal of Psychology1107–123
OlsonR KAttneaveF, 1970“What variables produce similarity grouping?”American Journal of Psychology831–21
27.
PeterhansEvon der HeydtR, 1991“Subjective contours—bridging the gap between psychophysics and physiology”Trends in Neuroscience14112–119
28.
PrandtlA, 1927“Über gleichsinnige Induktion und die Lichterteilung im gitterartigen Munstern”Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie58263–307
29.
PrazdnyK, 1983“Illusory contours are not caused by simultaneous brightness contrast”Perception & Psychophysics34403–404
30.
PrazdnyK, 1986“Illusory contours from inducers defined solely by spatiotemporal correlation”Perception & Psychophysics39175–178
31.
PurgheFCorenS, 1992“Subjective contours 1900–1990: Research trends and bibliography”Perception & Psychophysics51291–304
32.
RediesCCrookJ MCreutzfeldtO D, 1986“Neuronal responses to borders with and without luminance gradients in cat visual cortex and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus”Experimental Brain Research61469–481
33.
RiethCSireteanuR, 1993“How do infants perceive subjective contours?”, paper presented at the 4th Meeting of CVRS, Lyon, 11–13 July
34.
SchumannF, 1900“Beiträge zur Analyse der Gesichtswahrnehmungen: Erste Abhandlung. Einige Beobachtungen über die Zusammenfassung von Gesichtseindrucken zu Einheiten”Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane231–32. [Also published as “Contributions to the analysis of visual perception: First paper. Some observations on the combination of visual impressions into units”, translated by HoggA, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer, 1987) pp 21–34]
35.
ShapleyR M, 1994“Linearity and non-linearity in cortical receptive fields”Higher Order Processing in the Visual System: CIBA Foundation Symposium18471–87
36.
ShapleyRGordonJ, 1985“Nonlinearity in the perception of form”Perception & Psychophysics3784–88
37.
ShapleyRGordonJ, 1987“The existence of interpolated illusory contours depends on contrast and spatial separation”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer) pp 109–115
38.
ShippSZekiS, 1989“The organization of connections between areas V5 and V2 in macaque monkey visual cortex”European Journal of Neuroscience1333–354
39.
SireteanuR, (in press) “Texture segmentation, ‘pop-out’, and feature binding in infants and children”Progress in Infancy ResearchSireteanuRRiethCNeuB, (in preparation) “Infants' perception of subjective contours produced by an offset of parallel lines”
