Most computational and neural-style models of contour completion (ie illusory and occluded contours) are based on interpolation: the filling in of an edge between two visible edges. The results of three experiments suggest an alternative conception, that units are formed as a result of extrapolation from visible edges. In three experiments, subjects reported illusory contours between standard illusory-contour inducing elements and forms that do not, by themselves, induce illusory contours. We suggest that these forms are not a special case of inducing elements but that they represent a different class—receiving elements. Receiving elements are forms that can receive an illusory contour but cannot generate one, and they can alter contour formation. In experiment 1, receiving elements increased the judged clarity of illusory contours. In experiment 2, illusory edges were seen to connect to corners, line ends, and even the edges of circles. Boundary formation in motion displays also appears to be based on extrapolation. In experiment 3, subjects reported that small moving dots altered the formation of spatiotemporally defined boundaries. Implications for higher-order operator and network models of boundary formation are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonB L, 1994“The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis”Nature367365 – 368.
DayR HJoryM K, 1980“A note on a second stage in the formation of illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics2789 – 91.
4.
DayR HKasperczykR T, 1983“Amodal completion as a basis for illusory contours”Perception & Psychophysics33355 – 364.
5.
FieldD JHayesA.HessR F, 1993“Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local association field’”Vision Research33173 – 193.
6.
GibsonJ JKaplanG AReynoldsH NJrWheelerK., 1969“The change from visible to invisible: A study of optical transitions”Perception & Psychophysics5113 – 116.
7.
GilbertC., 1994“Circuitry, architecture and functional dynamics of visual cortex”, in Higher-order Processing in the Visual System Eds RockG.GoodeJ. (Chichester: John Wiley) pp 35 – 62.
GrossbergS.MingollaE., 1985“Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading”Psychological Review92173 – 211.
10.
HeitgerF.von der HeydtRPeterhansE.RosenthalerL.KublerO., 1998“Simulation of neural contour mechanisms: Representing anomalous contours”Image and Vision Computing16407 – 421.
11.
KanizsaG., 1955/1987“Quasi-perceptual margins in homogeneously stimulated fields”, translation into English in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetryS.MeyerG E, (1987, New York: Springer) pp 40 – 49.
12.
KanizsaG., 1979Organization in Vision (New York: Praeger).
13.
KellmanP JGuttmanS EWickensT D, 2001“Geometric and neural models of object perception”, in From Fragments to Objects: Segmentation and Grouping in Vision Advances in Psychology, 130, Eds ShipleyT FKellmanP J, (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science) pp 183 – 245.
14.
KellmanP JShipleyT F, 1991“A theory of visual interpolation in object perception”Cognitive Psychology23141 – 221.
15.
KennedyJ M, 1978“Illusory contours and the ends of lines”Perception7605 – 607.
16.
KennedyJ M, 1981“Illusory brightness and the ends of petals: Change in brightness without aid of stratification or assimilation effects”Perception10583 – 585.
17.
LesherG WMingollaE., 1993“The role of edges and lie-ends in illusory contour formation”Vision Research332253 – 2270.
18.
MinguzziG F, 1987“Anomalous figures and the tendency to continuation”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetryS.MeyerG E, (New York: Springer) pp 71 – 75.
PalmerE MKellmanP JShipleyT F, 2000“Modal and amodal perception of dynamically occluded objects”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science41(4) S439.
21.
PetryS.HarbeckA.ConwayJ.LeveyJ., 1983“Stimulus determinants of brightness and distinctness of subjective contours”Perception & Psychophysics34169 – 174.
22.
RingachD LShapleyR., 1996“Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion”Vision Research363037 – 3050.
23.
RockI.AnsonR., 1979“Illusory contours as the solution to a problem”Perception8665 – 681.
SambinM., 1987“A dynamic model of anomalous figures”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetryS.MeyerG E, (New York: Springer) pp 131 – 142.
26.
ShimojoS.NakayamaK., 1990“Amodal representation of occluded surfaces: Role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence”Perception19285 – 299.
27.
ShipleyT FCunninghamD W, 2001“Perception of occluding and occluded objects over time: Spatiotemporal segmentation and unit formation”, in From Fragments to Objects: Segmentation and Grouping in Vision Advances in Psychology, 130, Eds ShipleyT FKellmanP J, (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science) pp 557 – 585.
28.
ShipleyT FKellmanP J, 1990“The role of discontinuities in the perception of subjective figures”Perception & Psychophysics48259 – 270.
29.
ShipleyT FKellmanP J, 1993“Optical tearing in spatiotemporal boundary formation: When do local element motions produce boundaries, form, and global motion?”Spatial Vision7323 – 339.
30.
ShipleyT FKellmanP J, 1994“Spatiotemporal boundary formation: Boundary, form, and motion perception from transformations of surface elements”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General1233 – 20.
31.
ShipleyT FKellmanP J, 1997“Spatio-temporal boundary formation: The role of local motion signals in boundary perception”Vision Research371281 – 1293.
32.
UllmanS., 1979The Interpretation of Visual Motion (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
33.
YenS CFinkelL H, 1998“Extraction of perceptually salient contours by striate cortical networks”Vision Research38719 – 741.
34.
YinC.KellmanP JShipleyT F, 1997“Surface completion complements boundary interpolation in the visual integration of partly occluded objects”Perception261459 – 1479.
