Observers typically detect changes to central objects more readily than changes to marginal objects, but they sometimes miss changes to central, attended objects as well. However, even if observers do not report such changes, they may be able to recognize the changed object. In three experiments we explored change detection and recognition memory for several types of changes to central objects in motion pictures. Observers who failed to detect a change still performed at above chance levels on a recognition task in almost all conditions. In addition, observers who detected the change were no more accurate in their recognition than those who did not detect the change. Despite large differences in the detectability of changes across conditions, those observers who missed the change did not vary in their ability to recognize the changing object.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckM RLevinD T, 2003“The role of representational volatility in recognizing pre- and post-change objects”Perception & Psychophysics65458 – 468.
2.
BrewerW FSamarapungavanA., 1991“Children's theories vs. scientific theories: Differences in reasoning or differences in knowledge?”, in Cognition and the Symbolic Processes: Applied and Ecological Perspectives Eds HoffmanR RPalermoD S, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 209 – 232.
3.
ChunM MNakayamaK., 2000“On the functional role of implicit visual memory for the adaptive deployment of attention across scenes”Visual Cognition765 – 81.
4.
EricksonT DMattsonM E, 1981“From words to meaning: A semantic illusion”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior20540 – 551.
5.
GoodaleM AHumphreyG K, 2001“Separate visual systems for action and perception”, in Separate visual systems for action and perception Ed. GoldsteinE B, (Oxford: Blackwell) pp 311 – 343.
6.
GordonR DIrwinD E, 1996“What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies”Perception & Psychophysics581260 – 1277.
7.
GordonR DIrwinD E, 2000“The role of physical and conceptual properties in preserving object continuity”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition26136 – 150.
8.
HendersonJ M, 1994“Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General123410 – 426.
9.
HorowitzT SWolfeJ M, 1998“Visual search has no memory”Nature394575 – 577.
10.
IntraubH., 1981“Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance7604 – 610.
11.
IrwinD E, 1996“Integrating information across saccadic eye movements”Current Directions in Psychological Science594 – 100.
12.
KahnemanD.TreismanA., 1984“Changing views of attention and automaticity”, in Varieties of Attention Eds ParasuramanR.DaviesD A, (New York: Academic Press) pp 29 – 61.
13.
KahnemanD.TreismanA.GibbsB J, 1992“The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information”Cognitive Psychology24175 – 219.
14.
LevinD TSimonsD J, 1997“Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review4501 – 506.
15.
LevinD TSimonsD JAngeloneB LChabrisC F, 2002“Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm”British Journal of Psychology93289 – 302.
16.
McCloskeyM.ZaragozaM., 1985“Postevent information and memory: Reply to Loftus, Schooler, and Wagenaar”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General114381 – 387.
17.
MishkinM.UngerleiderL GMackoK A, 1983“Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways”Trends in Neurosciences6414 – 417.
18.
MitroffS RSimonsD JFranconeriS L, 2002“The siren song of implicit change detection”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance28798 – 815.
19.
O'ReganJ K, 1992“Solving the real’ mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory”Canadian Journal of Psychology46461 – 488.
20.
O'ReganJ KDeubelH.ClarkJ JRensinkR A, 2000“Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking”Visual Cognition7191 – 211.
21.
O'ReganJ KNoeA., 2001“A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness”Behavioral and Brain Sciences24939 – 1031.
22.
PashlerH., 1988“Familiarity and visual change detection”Perception & Psychophysics44369 – 378.
23.
PhillipsW A, 1974“On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory”Perception & Psychophysics16283 – 290.
24.
PotterM C, 1976“Short-term conceptual memory for pictures”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory2509 – 522.
25.
RederL MKusbitG W, 1991“Locus of the Moses Illusion: Imperfect encoding, retrieval, or match?”Journal of Memory and Language30385 – 406.
26.
RensinkR A, 2000a“The dynamic representation of scenes”Visual Cognition717 – 42.
27.
RensinkR A, 2000b“Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing”Vision Research401469 – 1487.
28.
RensinkR AO'ReganJ KClarkJ J, 1997“To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes”Psychological Science8368 – 373.
29.
RensinkR AO'ReganJ KClarkJ J, 2000“On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions”Visual Cognition7127 – 145.
