We carried out three experiments to examine the influence of field of view and binocular viewing restrictions on absolute distance perception in real-world indoor environments. Few of the classical visual cues provide direct information for accurate absolute distance judgments to points in the environment beyond about 2 m from the viewer. Nevertheless, in previous work it has been found that visually directed walking tasks reveal accurate distance estimations in full-cue real-world environments to distances up to 20 m. In contrast, the same tasks in virtual environments produced with head-mounted displays (HMDs) show large compression of distance. Field of view and binocular viewing are common limitations in research with HMDs, and have been rarely studied under full pictorial-cue conditions in the context of distance perception in the real-world. Experiment 1 showed that the view of one's body and feet on the floor was not necessary for accurate distance perception. In experiment 2 we manipulated the horizontal and the vertical field of view along with head rotation and found that a restricted field of view did not affect the accuracy of distance estimations when head movement was allowed. Experiment 3 showed that performance with monocular viewing was equal to that with binocular viewing. These results have implications for the information needed to scale egocentric distance in the real-world and reduce the support for the hypothesis that a limited field of view or imperfections in binocular image presentation are the cause of the underestimation seen with HMDs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlfanoP LMichelG F, 1990“Restricting the field of view: Perceptual and performance effects”Perceptual and Motor Skills7035–40
2.
ArthurK W, 2000Effects of Field of View on Performance with Head Mounted Displays unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
3.
BeallA CLoomisJ MPhilbeckJ WFikesT G, 1995“Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments”, in Proceedings of the Conference on Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display (Bellingham, WA: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers) 2411288–297
4.
CreemS HProffittD R, 1998“Two memories for geographical slant: separation and interdependence of action and awareness”Psychonomic Bulletin and Review522–36
5.
CunninghamJ ANelsonW THettingerL JHaasM WRussellC A, 1996“Perceptual and human factors issues in virtual environments (course notes): Assessing target detection performance using head position data: A qualitative and quantitative analysis”, in Proceedings of IMAGE ′96, Scottsdale, AZ, 23–28 June (Scottsdale, AZ: The IMAGE Society)
6.
CuttingJ EVishtonP M, 1995“Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth”, in Perception of Space and Motion Eds EpsteinWRogersS (New York: Academic Press) pp 69–117
7.
DolezalH, 1982“The restricted field of view: A neglected factor in adaptation research”, in Living in a World Transformed Ed. DolezalH (New York: Academic Press) pp 57–79
8.
DraperM, 1995Exploring the Influence of a Virtual Body on Spatial Awareness unpublished Masters Thesis, Department of Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
9.
DurginF HFoxL FLewisJWalleyK A, 2002“Perceptuomotor adaptation: More than meets the eye”poster presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO
10.
FoleyJ M, 1980“Binocular distance perception”Psychological Review87411–434
11.
FukusimaS SLoomisJ MDa SilvaJ A, 1997“Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2386–100
12.
GibsonJ J, 1950The Perception of the Visual World (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin)
13.
GogelW C, 1961“Convergence as a cue to the perceived distance of objects in a binocular configuration”Journal of Psychology52303–315
14.
GogelW C, 1977“The metric of visual space”, in Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception: Mechanisms and Processes Ed. EpsteinW (New York: Wiley and Sons) pp 129–181
15.
GoodaleMMilnerA D, 1992“Separate visual pathways for perception and action”Trends in Neurosciences1520–25
16.
HagenM AJonesR KReedE, 1978“On a neglected variable in theories of pictorial perception: Truncation of the visual field”Perception & Psychophysics23326–330
17.
KlineP BWitmerB G, 1996“Distance perception in virtual environments: Effects of field of view and surface texture at near distances”, in Proceedings of the HFES 40th Annual Meeting Philadelphia, PA (Santa Monica, CA: HFES) pp 112–116
18.
KnappJ M, 1999Visual Perception of Egocentric Distance in Virtual Environments unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
19.
KnappJ MLoomisJ M, 2004“Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments”Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments13572–577
20.
LoomisJ MDa SilvaJ AFujitaNFukusimaS S, 1992“Visual space perception and visually directed action”Journal of Experimental Psychology18906–921
21.
LoomisJ MDa SilvaJ APhilbeckJ WFukusimaS S, 1996“Visual perception of location and distance”Current Directions in Psychological Science572–77
22.
LoomisJ MKnappJ M, 2003“Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments”, in Virtual and Adaptive Environments Eds HettingerL JHaasM W (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 21–46
23.
OoiT LWuBHeZ J, 2001“Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon”Nature414197–200
24.
PhilbeckJ WLoomisJ M, 1997“Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2372–85
25.
PhilbeckJ WLoomisJ MBeallA C, 1997“Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action”Perception & Psychophysics59601–612
26.
PiantanidaT PBomanDLarimerJGilleJReedC, 1992“Studies of the field of view/resolution tradeoff in virtual reality”, in Proceedings of Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, SPIE Proceedings1666448–456
27.
PsotkaJLewisS AKingD, 1998“Effects of field of view on judgments of self-locations: Distortions in distance estimations even when the image geometry exactly fits the field of view”Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments7352–369
28.
RieckeB Evon der HeydeMBulthoffH H, 2001“How real is virtual reality really? Comparing spatial updating using pointing tasks in real and virtual environments”Journal of Vision1321
29.
RieckeB EVan VeenH A H CBulthoffH H, 2002“Visual homing is possible without landmarks: A path integration study in virtual reality”Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments11443–473
30.
RieserJ JAshmeadD HTalorC RYoungquistG A, 1990“Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets”Perception19675–689
31.
Schulte-PelkumJRieckeB Evon der HeydeM, 2003“Screen curvature does influence the perception of visually simulated ego-rotations”Journal of Vision3411
32.
Schulte-PelkumJRieckeB Evon der HeydeMBülthoffH H, 2002“Perceiving and controlling simulated ego-rotations from optic flow: Influence of field of view and display devices on ego-motion perception” poster presented at OPAM 2002, Kansas City, MO (available as “Influence of display device and screen curvature on perceiving and controlling simulated ego-rotations from optic flow”, MPI Technical Report, 2004, pp 1–8)
33.
SinaiM JOoiT LHeZ J, 1998“Terrain influences the accurate judgment of distance”Nature395497–500
34.
SteenhuisR EGoodaleM A, 1988“The effects of time and distance on accuracy of target-directed locomotion: does an accurate short-term memory for spatial location exist?”Journal of Motor Behavior20399–415
35.
StoperA ECohenM M, 1991“Optical, gravitational, and kinesthetic determinants of judged eye level”, in Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments Ed. EllisS R (Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis) pp 390–403
36.
ThompsonW BWillemsenPGoochA ACreem-RegehrS HLoomisJ MBeallA C, 2004, “Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distance in visually immersive environments?”Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments13560–571
37.
ThomsonJ A, 1983“Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9427–443
38.
WannJ PRushtonSMon-WilliamsM, 1995“Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments”Vision Research352731–2736
39.
WellsM JVenturinoM, 1990“Performance and head movements using a helmet-mounted display with different sized fields-of-view”Optical Engineering29870–877
40.
WillemsenPColtonM BCreem-RegehrS HThompsonW B, 2004“The effects of head-mounted display mechanics on distance judgments in virtual environments”, in ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, Los Angeles, CA, August 7–8 pp 35–38
41.
WillemsenPGoochA A, 2002“Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based and traditional virtual environments”, in Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, Orlando, FL pp 89–90
42.
WillemsenPGoochA AThompsonW BCreem-RegehrS H, 2005“Effects of stereo viewing conditions on distance perception in virtual environments”, University of Utah Technical Report UUCS-05-003, February
43.
WitmerB GKlineP B, 1998“Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments”Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments7144–167
44.
WitmerB GSadowskiW J J, 1998“Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments”Human Factors40478–488
45.
WragaM, 1999“Using eye height in different postures to scale the heights of objects”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25518–530
46.
WuBOoiT LHeZ J, 2004“Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information”Nature42873–77
