We show that cast shadows can have a significant influence on the speed of visual search. In particular, we find that search based on the shape of a region is affected when the region is darker than the background and corresponds to a shadow formed by lighting from above. Results support the proposal that an early-level system rapidly identifies regions as shadows and then discounts them, making their shapes more difficult to access. Several constraints used by this system are mapped out, including constraints on the luminance and texture of the shadow region, and on the nature of the item casting the shadow. Among other things, this system is found to distinguish between line elements (items containing only edges) and surface elements (items containing visible surfaces), with only the latter deemed capable of casting a shadow.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-HaythamI, 1000/1989The Optics of Ibn Al-Haytham Books I-III, translated by SabraA I, (London: The Warburg Institute).
2.
BaxandallM, 1995Shadows and Enlightenment (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press) pp 1–15.
3.
BeckJ, 1982“Textural segmentation”, in Organization and Representation in Perception Ed. BeckJ, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 285–317.
4.
BrajeW LKerstenDTarrM JTrojeN F, 1998“Illumination effects in face recognition”Psychobiology26371–380.
5.
BuhlerK, 1922Die Erscheinungsweisen der Farben (Jena: Fischer).
6.
CasatiR, 2000“The structure of shadows”, in Time and Motion of Socio-Economic Units Eds FrankARaperJCheylanJ P, (London: Taylor & Francis) pp 99–109.
7.
CavanaghP, 1991“What's up in top – down processing?”, in Representations of Vision: Trends and Tacit Assumptions in Vision Research Ed. GoreaA, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 295–304.
8.
CavanaghPLeclercY G, 1989“Shape from shadows”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance153–27.
9.
CunninghamR KBeckJMingollaE, 1996“Visual search for a foreground object in continuous, naturalistic displays: The importance of shadows and occlusion”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science37(4) S299 (abstract).
10.
DiLolloVEnnsJ TRensinkR A, 2000“Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General129481–507.
11.
ElderJ HTrithartSPintilieGMacLeanD, 1998“Rapid processing of cast and attached shadows”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science39(4) S853(abstract).
12.
EnnsJ TRensinkR A, 1990“Influence of scene-based properties on visual search”Science247721–723.
13.
HeZ JNakayamaK, 1992“Surfaces versus features in visual search”Nature359231–233.
14.
von HelmholtzH, 1867/1962Treatise on Physiological Opticsvolume 3 (New York: Dover, 1962); English translation by SouthallJ P C, for the Optical Society of America (1925) from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (first published in 1867, Leipzig: Voss).
15.
HeringE, 1874/1964Outlines of a Theory of the Light Sense (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964); English translation by HurvichL MJamesonD, from Zur Lehre vom Lichtsinn (Vienna: Gerolds Sohne, 1874).
16.
HornBKP, 1974“Determining lightness from an image”Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing3277–299.
17.
JuleszB, 1984“A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision”Trends in Neurosciences741–45.
18.
KardosL, 1934“Ding und Schatten: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung über die Grundlagen des Farbensehens”Zeitschrift für Psychologie23 entire volume.
KleffnerD ARamachandranV S, 1992“On the perception of shape from shading”Perception & Psychophysics5218–36.
21.
KriegmanD JBelhumeurP N, 2001“What shadows reveal about object structure”Journal of the Optical Society of America A181804–1813.
22.
LynchD KLivingstonW, 1995Color and Light in Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 1–4.
23.
MamassianPKnillD CKerstenD, 1998“The perception of cast shadows”Trends in Cognitive Sciences2288–295.
24.
MarrD, 1982Vision (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman).
25.
MitsudoH, 2003“Information regarding structure and lightness based on phenomenal transparency influences the efficency of visual search”Perception3253–66.
26.
NakayamaKHeZ JShimojoS, 1995“Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision”, in Frontiers in Cognitive Neuroscience2nd edition Eds KosslynSOshersonD N, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 1–70.
OstrovskyYCavanaghPSinhaP, 2001“Perceiving illumination inconsistencies in scenes” AI Memo 2001-029, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, November 2001; http://cbcl.mit.edu/cbcl/publications/memos-reports.html.
29.
RamachandranV S, 1988“Perceiving shape from shading”Scientific American259(8) 76–83.
30.
RauschenbergerRYantisS, 2001“Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search”Nature410369–372.
31.
RensinkR A, 2000“The dynamic representation of scenes”Vision Cognition717–42.
32.
RensinkR ACavanaghP, 1993“Processing of shadows at preattentive levels”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science34(4) S1288 (abstract).
33.
RensinkR AEnnsJ T, 1995“Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping”Psychological Review102101–130.
34.
RensinkR AEnnsJ T, 1998“Early completion of occluded objects”Vision Research382489–2505.
35.
TreismanAGeladeG, 1980“A feature integration theory of attention”Cognitive Psychology1297–136.
36.
TreismanAGormicanS, 1988“Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries”Psychological Review9515–48.
37.
WolfeJ M, 1998“What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search?”Psychological Science933–39.
38.
WolfeJ MYuK PStewartM IShorterA DFriedman-HillS RCaveK R, 1990“Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color x color and orientation x orientation conjunctions”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16879–892.
39.
ZuckerS W, 1987“The diversity of perceptual grouping”, in Vision, Brain, and Co-operative Computation Eds ArbibM AHansonA R, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 231–261.
