We investigated the angular resolution subserving the haptic perception of raised-line drawings by measuring how accurately observers could discriminate between two angle sizes under various conditions. We found that, for acute angles, discrimination performance is highly dependent on exploration strategy: mean thresholds of 2.9° and 6.0° were found for two different exploration strategies. For one of the strategies we found that discriminability is not dependent on the bisector orientation of the angle. Furthermore, we found that thresholds almost double when the angular extent is increased from 20° to 135°. We also found that local apex information has a significant influence on discrimination for acute as well as obtuse angles. In the last experiment we investigated the influence of depiction mode but did not find any effect. Overall, the results tell us that the acuity with which angles in raised-line drawings are perceived is determined by the exploration strategy, local apex information, and global angular extent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongLMarksL E, 1999“Haptic perception of linear extent”Perception & Psychophysics611211–1226
2.
BerlaEButterfieldL, 1977“Tactual distinctive features analysis: training blind students in shape recognition and in locating shapes on a map”Journal of Special Education11335–345
3.
BerlaEButterfieldLMurrM, 1976“Tactual reading of political maps by blind students: a video-matic behavioral analysis”Journal of Special Education10265–276
4.
CorenS, 1993The Left-hander Syndrome: The Causes and Consequences of Left-handedness (New York: Vintage Books)
5.
CraigJ C, 1999“Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity”Somatosensory and Motor Research16197–206
6.
DavidsonP, 1972“Haptic judgements of curvature by blind and sighted humans”Journal of Experimental Psychology9343–55
7.
EssockE AKrebsW KPratherJ R, 1997“Superior sensitivity for tactile stimuli oriented proximally – distally on the finger: Implications for mixed Class 1 and Class 2 anisotropies”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23515–527
8.
FasseE DHoganNKayB AMussa-IvaldiF A, 2000“Haptic interaction with virtual objects— spatial perception and motor control”Biological Cybernetics8269–83
9.
GentazEHatwellY, 2004“Geometrical haptic illusions: The role of exploration in the Müller-Lyer, vertical – horizontal, and Delboeuf illusions”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review1131–40
10.
GibsonG OCraigJ C, 2005“Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy”Perception & Psychophysics671061–1079
11.
HellerM A, 1989“Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: the advantage of the late blind”Perception18379–389
12.
HellerM A, 2002“Tactile picture perception in sighted and blind people”Behavioural Brain Research13565–68
13.
HellerM ACalcaterraJ ABursonL LTylerL A, 1996“Tactual picture identification by blind and sighted people: Effects of providing categorical information”Perception & Psychophysics58310–323
14.
KlatzkyRLedermanSMetzgerV, 1985“Identifying objects by touch: An expert system”Perception & Psychophysics37299–302
15.
KlatzkyRLoomisJ MLedermanS JWakeHFujitaN, 1993“Haptic identification of objects and their depictions”Perception & Psychophysics54170–178
16.
LakatosSMarksL E, 1998“Haptic underestimation of angular extent”Perception27737–754
17.
LedermanS JKlatzkyR L, 1987“Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition”Cognitive Psychology19342–368
18.
LedermanS JKlatzkyR LChatawayCSummersC D, 1990“Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of 2-dimensional pictures of common objects”Perception & Psychophysics4754–64
19.
LoomisJ M, 1981“Tactile pattern perception”Perception105–27
20.
LoomisJ M, 1990“A model of character-recognition and legibility”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16106–120
21.
LoomisJ MKlatzkyR LLedermanS J, 1991“Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view”Perception20167–177
MillarSAl-AttarZ, 2000“Vertical and bisection bias in active touch”Perception29481–500
24.
MillarSAl-AttarZ, 2002“The Müller-Lyer illusion in touch and vision: Implications for multisensory processes”Perception & Psychophysics64353–365
25.
RussierS, 1999“Haptic discrimination of two dimensional raised-line shapes by blind and sighted adults”Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness93421–426
26.
ThompsonL JChronicleE PCollinsA F, 2003“The role of pictorial convention in haptic picture perception”Perception32887–893
27.
VoisinJBenoitG VChapmanC E, 2002a“Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: two-dimensional angle discrimination”Experimental Brain Research145239–250
28.
VoisinJLamarreYChapmanC E, 2002b“Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: contribution of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs”Experimental Brain Research145251–260
29.
WeberE, 1834/1996E. H. Weber on the Tactile Senses2nd edition (Hove, Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor and Francis)
30.
WheatH EGoodwinA W, 2000“Tactile discrimination of gaps by slowly adapting afferents: effects of population parameters and anisotropy in the fingerpad”Journal of Neurophysiology841430–1444
31.
WichmannF AHillN J, 2001“The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling”Perception & Psychophysics631314–1329
