In order to convert a 2-D image to a 3-D percept, the visual system must apply constraints that maximize the chances that the result will be unique and veridical. Previously proposed constraints include one that maximizes the symmetry of the percept, and one that maximizes its compactness (Li et al, 2009 Vision Research49 979–991). Analysis of the 3-D percepts elicited by certain 2-D forms suggests the action of an additional constraint, favoring the alignment of the surfaces and/or axis of symmetry of the perceived object with the horizontal plane.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnheimA, 1974Art and Visual Perception (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)
2.
DeregowskiJ BParkerD M, 1992“Three-space inference from two-space stimulation”Perception & Psychophysics51397–403
3.
GriffithsA FZaidiQ, 2000“Perceptual assumptions and projective distortions in a three-dimensional shape illusion”Perception29171–200
4.
LiYPizloZSteinmanR M, 2009“A computational model that recovers the 3D shape of an object from a single 2D retinal representation”Vision Research49979–991
5.
MamassianPLandyM S, 1998“Observer biases in the 3D representation of line drawings”Vision Research382817–2832
6.
PerkinsD N, 1976“How good a bet is good form”Perception5393–406
7.
PizloZSawadaT, 2008“Detection of skewed symmetry”Journal of Vision81–18
8.
SaundersJ ABackusB T, 2007“Both parallelism and orthogonality are used to perceive 3D slant of rectangles from 2D images”Journal of Vision71–11
9.
ShepardR N, 1981“Psychophysical complementarity”, in Perceptual Organization Eds KubovyMPomerantzJ (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 279–341
