For this experiment a visual illusion was created in which the participant's finger looked and felt as though it was being stretched to twice its normal length until it snapped and the tip came off. It was then stabbed with virtual weapons while skin conductance was measured. Sometimes the fingertip moved under the participant's own control and sometimes it moved independently. Curiously, detaching the tip of the finger destroyed the underlying ownership for the remaining stump as well as for the tip itself, even when the tip was under participants' control. These results have implications for theories of agency, embodiment, and tool-use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CardinaliLBrozzoliCFarnèA, 2009“Peripersonal space and body schema: two labels for the same concept?”Brain Topography21252–260
2.
EhrssonH HWiechKWeiskopfNDolanR JPassinghamR E, 2007“Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA1049828–9833
3.
GiummarraM JGeorgiou-KaristianisNNichollsM E RGibsonS JBradshawJ L, 2010“The phantom in the mirror: A modified rubber-hand illusion in amputees and normals”Perception39103–118
IrikiATanakaMIwamuraY, 1996“Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones”Neuro Report22325–2330
6.
KaoK LGoodaleM A, 2009“Enhanced detection of visual targets on the hand and familiar tools”Neruropsychologia472454–2463
7.
NewportRPearceRPrestonC, 2010“Fake hands in action: embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs”Experimental Brain Research204385–395, doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2104-y
8.
TsakirisMPrabhuGHaggardP, 2006“Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership”Consciousness and Cognition15423–432
