Previous studies have suggested that physiological responses are greatest and face recognition performance is best when a band of middle relative spatial frequencies (SFs) is included in stimuli. Conversely, behavioural data suggest that object recognition performance shows comparatively little effect of SF variations. Here, we examine the effects of SF filtering on the amplitude of the N170 ERP component when participants are shown images of faces and objects. Our findings show that with face stimuli the amplitude of N170 exhibits a band-pass modulation function, with responses to middle SFs (around 11 cycles per face) being statistically indistinguishable from responses to full-band faces. In contrast to faces, object stimuli elicited a relatively flat function across much of the spectrum. However, for both faces and objects, middle spatial frequencies were sufficient to elicit the same N170 magnitude as full-band images. Our results with face stimuli are in accordance with previous work examining single-cell and MEG responses. Our results with objects are compatible with previous behavioural work showing a relative robustness of object recognition to SF manipulations. Our findings are novel in showing that the middle band elicits the same N170 as full-band images in both faces and objects.
BentinSAllisonTPuceAPerezEMcCarthyG, 1996“Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience8551–565.
2.
BiedermanIKalocsaiP, 1997“Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B3521203–1219.
3.
BoutetICollinCFaubertJ, 2003“Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information”Perception & Psychophysics651078–1093.
4.
CampbellF WRobsonJ G, 1968“Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings”Journal of Physiology197551–566.
5.
CollinC A, 2006“Spatial-frequency thresholds for object categorisation at basic and subordinate levels”Perception3541–52.
6.
CollinC ALiuC HTrojeN FMcMullenP AChaudhuriA, 2004“Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance30975–987.
7.
CollinC AMcMullenP A, 2005“Subordinate-level categorization relies on high spatial frequencies to a greater degree than basic-level categorization”Perception & Psychophysics67354–364.
8.
CollinC ARainvilleS J M, accepted “Configural and featural processing of faces use the same spatial frequencies: An ideal observer vs human observer analysis” abstractCanadian Journal of Experimental Psychology.
9.
CollinC ATherrienMMartinCRainvilleS, 2006a“Spatial frequency thresholds for face recognition when comparison faces are filtered and unfiltered”Perception & Psychophysics68879–889.
10.
CollinC AWangLO'ByrnB, 2006b“Effects of image background on spatial-frequency thresholds for face recognition”Perception351459–1472.
11.
CostenN PParkerD MCrawI, 1994“Spatial content and spatial quantisation effects in face recognition”Perception23129–146.
12.
CostenN PParkerD MCrawI, 1996“Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification”Perception & Psychophysics58602–612.
13.
DeffkeISanderTHeidenreichJSommerWCurioGTrahmsLLueschowA, 2007“MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus”Neuroimage351495–1501.
14.
De ValoisR LDe ValoisK K, 1990Spatial VisionVolume 14 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
15.
EimerM, 2011“The face-sensitive N170 component of the event-related brain potential”, in The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception Eds CalderA JRhodesGJohnsonMHaxbyJ, (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 329–344.
16.
FieldD J, 1987, “Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells”Journal of the Optical Society of America A42379–2394.
17.
FiorentiniAMaffeiLSandiniG, 1983“The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception”Perception12195–201.
18.
FlevarisA VRobertsonL CBentinS, 2008“Using spatial frequency scales for processing face features and face configuration: An ERP analysis”Brain Research1194100–109.
19.
GasparCSekulerA BBennettP J, 2008“Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification”Vision Research482817–2826.
20.
GinsburgA P, 1978Visual information Processing Based on Spatial Filters Constrained by Biological Data unpublished doctoral thesis.
21.
GoldJBennettP JSekulerA B, 1999“Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers”Vision Research393537–3560.
22.
HalitHde HaanMSchynsP GJohnsonM H, 2006“Is high-spatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection?”Brain Research1117154–161.
23.
HsiaoF JHsiehJ CLinY YChangY, 2005“The effects of face spatial frequencies on cortical processing revealed by magnetoencephalography”Neuroscience Letters38054–59.
24.
ItierR JTaylorM J, 2002“Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs”Neuroimage15353–372.
25.
ItierR JTaylorM J, 2004“Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects”NeuroReport151261–1265.
26.
KeilM S, 2009, “‘I look in your eyes, honey’: Internal face features induce spatial frequency preference for human face processing”PLoS Computational Biology5e1000329.
27.
LiuC HCollinC ARainvilleS J MChaudhuriA, 2000“The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26956–979.
28.
LivingstoneMHubelD, 1988“Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception”Science240740–749.
29.
MarziTViggianoM P, in press “Temporal dynamics of face inversion at encoding and retrieval”Clinical Neurophysiology.
30.
MaurerDGrandR LMondlochC J, 2002“The many faces of configural processing”Trends in Cognitive Sciences6255–260.
NäsänenR, 1999“Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images”Vision Research393824–3833.
33.
ParkerD MCostenN P, 2001“One extreme or the other, or perhaps the golden mean? Issues of spatial resolution in face processing”, in Validation in Psychology: Research Perspectives Eds EllisHMacraeN, (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers) pp 151–162.
34.
RollsE TBaylisG CHasselmoM E, 1987“The responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey to band-pass spatial frequency filtered faces”Vision Research27311–326.
35.
RossionBDelvenneJ FDebatisseDGoffauxVBruyerRCrommelinckMGueritJ M, 1999“Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: An event-related potentials study”Biological Psychology50173–189.
36.
RossionBGauthierIGoffauxVTarrM JCrommelinckM, 2002“Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses”Psychological Science13250–257.
37.
RossionBKungC CTarrM J, 2004“Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA10114521–14526.
38.
SchynsP G, 1998“Diagnostic recognition: Task constraints, object information, and their interactions”Cognition67147–179.
39.
SchynsP GOlivaA, 1997“Flexible, diagnosticity-driven, rather than fixed, perceptually determined scale selection in scene and face recognition”Perception261027–1038.
40.
ShibataTNishijoHTamuraRMiyamotoKEifukuSEndoSOnoT, 2002“Generators of visual evoked potentials for faces and eyes in the human brain as determined by dipole localization”Brain Topogaphy1551–63.
41.
TanakaJ WCurranT, 2001“A neural basis for expert object recognition”Psychological Science1243–47.
42.
TanskanenTNäsänenR.MontezTPäällysahoJHariR, 2005“Face recognition and cortical responses show similar sensitivity to noise spatial frequency”Cerebral Cortex15526–534.
43.
WatierNCollinC ABoutetI, 2009“Spatial frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces” abstractCanadian Journal of Experimental Psychology—Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale63343–343.
44.
WatierN NCollinC ABoutetI, 2010“Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces”Perception39502–513.
45.
WillenbockelVFisetDChauvinABlaisCArguinMTanakaJ WBubDGosselinF, 2010“Does face inversion change spatial frequency tuning?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance36122–135.
46.
WilliamsN RWillenbockelVGauthierI, 2009“Sensitivity to spatial frequency and orientation content is not specific to face perception”Vision Research492353–2362.
