Measuring the Effects through Time of the Influence of Visuomotor and Visuotactile Synchronous Stimulation on a Virtual Body Ownership Illusion

Abstract

Previous studies have examined the experience of owning a virtual surrogate body or body part through specific combinations of cross-modal multisensory stimulation. Both visuomotor (VM) and visuotactile (VT) synchronous stimulation have been shown to be important for inducing a body ownership illusion, each tested separately or both in combination. In this study we compared the relative importance of these two cross-modal correlations, when both are provided in the same immersive virtual reality setup and the same experiment. We systematically manipulated VT and VM contingencies in order to assess their relative role and mutual interaction. Moreover, we present a new method for measuring the induced body ownership illusion through time, by recording reports of breaks in the illusion of ownership (‘breaks’) throughout the experimental phase. The balance of the evidence, from both questionnaires and analysis of the breaks, suggests that while VM synchronous stimulation contributes the greatest to the attainment of the illusion, a disruption of either (through asynchronous stimulation) contributes equally to the probability of a break in the illusion.

Keywords

perceptual illusions body ownership illusion rubber hand illusion multisensory integration virtual reality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armel

K. C.

Ramachandran

V. S.

(2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society, 270(1523), 1499–1506.

Barnsley

McAuley

J. H.

Mohan

Dey

Thomas

Moseley

G. L.

(2011). The rubber hand illusion increases histamine reactivity in the real arm. Current Biology, 21(23), R945–R946.

Botvinick

Cohen

(1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756.

Dummer

Picot-Annand

Neal

Moore

(2009). Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception, 38, 271–280.

Ehrsson

H. H.

(2012). The concept of body ownership and its relation to multisensory integration. In Stein

B. E.

(Ed.), The new handbook of multisensory processing (pp. 775–792). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ehrsson

H. H.

Wiech

Weiskopf

Dolan

R. J.

Passingham

R. E.

(2007). Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 9828–9833.

Grechkin

T. Y.

Nguyen

T. D.

Plumert

J. M.

Cremer

J. F.

Kearney

J. K.

(2010). How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments? ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 7(4), 26:1–26:18.

Hohwy

Paton

(2010). Explaining away the body: Experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion. PLoS ONE, 5(2), e941.

Honma

Koyama

Osada

(2009). Double tactile sensations evoked by a single visual stimulus on a rubber hand. Neuroscience Research, 65, 307–311.

10.

Karlin

(1969). A first course in stochastic processes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

11.

Kilteni

Normand

J.-M.

Sanchez-Vives

M. V.

Slater

(2012). Extending body space in immersive virtual reality: A very long arm illusion. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e40867.

12.

Lenggenhager

Mouthon

Blanke

(2009). Spatial aspects of bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 110–117.

13.

Llobera

Sanchez-Vives

M. V.

Slater

(2013). The relationship between virtual body ownership and temperature sensitivity. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(85), 20130300.

14.

Longo

M. R.

Schüür

Kammers

M. P. M.

Tsakiris

Haggard

(2009). Self awareness and the body image. Acta Psychologica, 132, 166–172.

15.

Maselli

Slater

(2013). The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(83), 1–15.

16.

Moseley

G. L.

Olthof

Venema

Don

Wijers

Gallace

Spence

(2008). Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 13169–13173.

17.

Normand

J.-M.

Giannopoulos

Spanlang

Slater

(2011). Multisensory stimulation can induce an illusion of larger belly size in immersive virtual reality. PLoS ONE, 6(1), e16128.

18.

Pabon

Padilla

M. A.

Frisoli

Greco

Bergamasco

Dataglove

A. P.

(2010). Ownership illusion of the hand/arm through dynamic VR interactions and automatic vibrotactile stimulation. 19th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Viareggio, Italy, 13–15 September (pp. 629–634). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Publications.

19.

Perez-Marcos

Sanchez-Vives

M. V.

Slater

(2012). Is my hand connected to my body? The impact of body continuity and arm alignment on the virtual hand illusion. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 6, 295–305.

20.

Petkova

V. I.

Ehrsson

H. H.

(2008). If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS ONE, 3(12), e3832.

21.

Petkova

V. I.

Khoshnevis

Ehrsson

H. H.

(2011). The perspective matters! Multisensory integration in ego-centric reference frames determines full-body ownership. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(35), 1–7.

22.

Sanchez-Vives

M. V.

Slater

(2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 332–339.

23.

Sanchez-Vives

M. V.

Spanlang

Frisoli

Bergamasco

Slater

(2010). Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10381.

24.

Slater

Perez-Marcos

Ehrsson

H. H.

Sanchez-Vives

M. V.

(2008). Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2(6), 1–8.

25.

Slater

Spanlang

Sanchez-Vives

M. V.

Blanke

(2010). First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE, 5(5), e10564.

26.

Slater

Steed

(2000). A virtual presence counter. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9, 413–434.

27.

Tsakiris

Carpenter

James

Fotopoulou

(2010). Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 343–352.

28.

Tsakiris

Haggard

(2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 80–91.

29.

Tsakiris

Haggard

Franck

Mainy

Sirigu

(2005). A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition, 96, 215–231.

30.

Tsakiris

Prabhu

Haggard

(2006). Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 423–432.

31.

Walsh

L. D.

Moseley

G. L.

Taylor

J. L.

Gandevia

S. C.

(2011). Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. The Journal of Physiology, 589, 3009–3021.

32.

Yuan

Steed

(2010). Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? IEEE Virtual Reality 2010 Conference, Waltham, MA, 20–24 March (pp. 95–102). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Publications.