It has been shown that it is possible to induce a strong illusion that a virtual body (VB) is one's own body. However, the relative influence of a first-person-perspective (1PP) view of the VB and spatial coincidence of the real body and VB remains unclear. We demonstrate a method that permits separation of these two factors. It provides a 1PP view of a VB, supporting visuomotor synchrony between real body and VB movements, but where the entire scene including the body is rotated 15° upwards through the axis connecting the eyes, so that the VB and real body are coincident only through this axis. In a within-subjects study that compared this 15° rotation with a 0° rotation condition, participants reported only slightly diminished levels of perceived ownership of the VB in the rotated condition and did not detect the rotation of the scene. These results indicate that strong spatial coincidence of the virtual and real bodies is not necessary for a full-body ownership illusion. The rotation method used, similar to the effects of vertical prisms, did not produce significant negative side-effects, thus providing a useful methodology for further investigations of body ownership.
AkidukiH.NishiikeS.WatanabeH.MatsuokaK.KuboT.TakedaN. (2003). Visual-vestibular conflict induced by virtual reality in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 340, 197–200.
2.
AspellJ. E.LenggenhagerB.BlankeO. (2009). Keeping in touch with one's self: Multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness. PLoS ONE, 4, e6488.
3.
BanakouD.GrotenR.SlaterM. (2013). Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 110, 12846–12851.
4.
BarraJ.PérennouD.ThiloK. V.GrestyM. A.BronsteinA. M. (2012). The awareness of body orientation modulates the perception of visual vertical. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2492–2498.
5.
BlankeO.MetzingerT. (2008). Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 7–13.
6.
BolteB.BruderG.SteinickeF.HinrichsK.LappeM. (2010). Augmentation techniques for efficient exploration in head-mounted display environments. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp. 11–18). New York: ACM.
BouchardS.St-JacquesJ.RenaudP.WiederholdB. K. (2009). Side effects of immersions in virtual reality for people suffering from anxiety disorders. Journal of Cybertherapy and Rehabilitation, 2, 127–137.
9.
ClarkR. A.BryantA. L.PuaY.McCroryP.BennellK.HuntM. (2010). Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait & Posture, 31, 307–310.
10.
CobbS. V. G. (1999). Measurement of postural stability before and after immersion in a virtual environment. Applied Ergonomics, 30, 47–57.
11.
de la PenaN.WeilP.LloberaJ.GiannopoulosE.PomesA.SpanlangB.FriedmanD.Sanchez-VivesM. V.SlaterM. (2010). Immersive journalism: Immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19, 291–301.
12.
De VignemontF. (2011). Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 82–93.
13.
DielsC.UkaiK.HowarthP. A. (2007). Visually induced motion sickness with radial displays: Effects of gaze angle and fixation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78, 659–665.
14.
DummerT.Picot-AnnandA.NealT.MooreC. (2009). Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception, 38, 271–280.
15.
EhrssonH. H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 317, 1048.
16.
EngelD.CurioC.TcheangL.MohlerB.BülthoffH. H. (2008). A psychophysically calibrated controller for navigating through large environments in a limited free-walking space. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp. 157–164). New York: ACM.
17.
GilliesM.SpanlangB. (2010). Comparing and evaluating real time character engines for virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19, 95–117.
18.
GolomerE.GuillouE.TestaM.LecoqC.OhlmannT. (2005). Contribution of neck proprioception to subjective vertical perception among experts in physical activities and untrained women. Neuroscience Letters, 381, 31–35.
19.
González-FrancoM.Perez-MarcosD.SpanlangB.SlaterM. (2010). The contribution of real-time mirror reflections of motor actions on virtual body ownership in an immersive virtual environment. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (pp. 111–114). New York: ACM.
20.
GrechkinT. Y.NguyenT. D.PlumertJ. M.CremerJ. F.KearneyJ. K. (2010). How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments?ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 7(4):26, 1–18.
21.
HaansA.IjsselsteijnW. A.de KortY. A. W. (2008). The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image, 5, 389–394.
22.
JeraldJ.PeckT.SteinickeF.WhittonM. (2008). Sensitivity to scene motion for phases of head yaws. Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (pp. 155–162). New York: ACM.
23.
KalckertA.EhrssonH. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(40). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040.
24.
KammersM.de VignemontF.VerhagenL.DijkermanH. C. (2009). The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia, 47, 204–211.
25.
KellyJ.RieckeB.LoomisJ.BeallA. (2008). Visual control of posture in real and virtual environments. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 158–165.
26.
KennedyR. S.DrexlerJ.KennedyR. C. (2010). Research in visually induced motion sickness. Applied Ergonomics, 41, 494–503.
27.
KennedyR.LaneN.BerbaumK.LilienthalM. (1993). Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 203–220.
28.
KilteniK.GrotenR.SlaterM. (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21, 373–387.
29.
KokkinaraE.SlaterM. (2014). Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactile synchronous stimulation on a virtual body ownership illusion. Perception, 43, 43–58.
30.
KolenikovS.AngelesG. (2004). The use of discrete data in PCA: Theory, simulations, and applications to socioeconomics indices. CPC/MEASURE working paper WP-04-85, Carolina Population Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
31.
KuhlS. A.ThompsonW. B.Creem-RegehrS. H. (2009). HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6(3):19, 1–20.
32.
LenggenhagerB.MouthonM.BlankeO. (2009). Spatial aspects of bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 110–117.
33.
LenggenhagerB.SmithS.BlankeO. (2006). Functional and neural mechanisms of embodiment: Importance of the vestibular system and the temporal parietal junction. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 17, 643–657.
34.
LenggenhagerB.TadiT.MetzingerT.BlankeO. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317, 1096–1099.
35.
LloberaJ.Sanchez-VivesM. V.SlaterM. (2013). The relationship between virtual body ownership and temperature sensitivity. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(85). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0300.
36.
LopezC.HaljeP.BlankeO. (2008). Body ownership and embodiment: Vestibular and multisensory mechanisms. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 149–161.
37.
MaselliA.SlaterM. (2013). The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(83). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00083.
38.
MessingR.DurginF. H. (2005). Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 234–250.
39.
MichelC.PisellaL.PrablancC.RodeG.RossettiY. (2007). Enhancing visuomotor adaptation by reducing error signals: Single-step (aware) versus multiple-step (unaware) exposure to wedge prisms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 341–350.
40.
MurataA. (2004). Effects of duration of immersion in a virtual reality environment on postural stability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 463–477.
41.
NormandJ.-M.GiannopoulosE.SpanlangB.SlaterM. (2011). Multisensory stimulation can induce an illusion of larger belly size in immersive virtual reality. PLoS ONE, 6, e16128.
42.
OlssonU. (19779). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443–460.
43.
OoiT. L.WuB.HeZ. J. (2001). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature, 414, 197–200.
44.
PalmisanoS.BonatoF.BubkaA.FolderJ. (2007). Vertical display oscillation effects on forward vection and simulator sickness. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78, 951–956.
45.
PeckT. C.FuchsH.WhittonM. C. (2009). Evaluation of reorientation techniques and distractors for walking in large virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15, 383–394.
46.
PeckT. C.SeinfeldS.AgliotiS. M.SlaterM. (2013). Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 779–787.
47.
PetkovaV. I.BjörnsdotterM.GentileG.JonssonT.LiT.-Q.EhrssonH. H. (2011a). From part- to whole-body ownership in the multisensory brain. Current Biology, 21, 1118–1122.
48.
PetkovaV.EhrssonH. (2008). If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS ONE, 3, e3832.
49.
PetkovaV. I.KhoshnevisM.EhrssonH. H. (2011b). The perspective matters! Multisensory integration in ego-centric reference frames determines full body ownership. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(35). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00035.
50.
PfeifferC.LopezC.SchmutzVDuenasJ. A.MartuzziR.BlankeO. (2013). Multisensory origin of the subjective first-person perspective: Visual, tactile, and vestibular mechanisms. PLoS ONE, 8, e61751.
51.
PomésA.SlaterM. (2013). Drift and ownership towards a distant virtual body. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(908). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00908.
52.
PrietoT. E.MyklebustJ. B.HoffmannR. G.LovettE. G.MyklebustB. M. (1996). Measures of postural steadiness: Differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 43, 956–966.
53.
ReddingG.RossettiY.WallaceB. (2005). Applications of prism adaptation: A tutorial in theory and method. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 431–444.
54.
RiemerM.KleinböhlD.HölzlR.TrojanJ. (2013). Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 229, 383–393.
55.
RockI.GoldbergJ.MackA. (1966). Immediate correction and adaptation based on viewing a prismatically displaced scene. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 351–354.
56.
Sanchez-VivesM.SpanlangB.FrisoliA.BergamascoM.SlaterM. (2010). Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE, 5, e10381.
57.
SlaterM.Perez-MarcosD.EhrssonH. H.Sanchez-VivesM. V. (2008). Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2(6). doi:10.3389/neuro.09.006.2008.
58.
SlaterM.SpanlangB.Sanchez-VivesM.BlankeO. (2010). First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE, 5, e10564.
59.
SpanlangB.NormandJ.GiannopoulosE.SlaterM. (2010). GPU based detection and mapping of collisions for haptic rendering in Immersive Virtual Reality. 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Haptic Audio-visual Environments and Games (HAVE) (pp. 1–4). doi:10.1109/HAVE.2010.5623976.
60.
StanneyK. M.KennedyR. S. (2009). Stimulation sickness. In VincenziD.WiseJ.MoulouaM.HancockP. (Eds.), Human factors in simulation and training (pp. 117–127). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
61.
TakadaH.YamamotoT.MiyaoM.AoyamaT.FurutaM.ShiozawaT. (2009). Effect of a stereoscopic movie on the correlation between head acceleration and body sway. In ShumakerR. (Ed.), Virtual and mixed reality (pp. 120–127). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
62.
TecchiaF.CarrozzinoM.BacinelliS.RossiF.VercelliD.MarinoG.GasparelloP.BergamascoM. (2010). A flexible framework for wide-spectrum VR development. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19, 302–312.
63.
ThompsonW. B.DildaV.Creem-RegehrS. H. (2007). Absolute distance perception to locations off the ground plane. Perception, 36, 1559–1571.
64.
TrutoiuL. C.MohlerB. J.Schulte-PelkumJ.BülthoffH. H. (2009). Circular, linear, and curvilinear vection in a large-screen virtual environment with floor projection. Computers & Graphics, 33, 47–58.
65.
TsakirisM. (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model ofbody-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48, 703–712.
66.
TsakirisM.HaggardP.FranckN.MainyN.SiriguA. (2005). A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition, 96, 215–231.
67.
TsakirisM.PrabhuG.HaggardP. (2006). Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 423–432.
68.
van der HoortB.GuterstamA.EhrssonH. H. (2011). Being Barbie: The size of one's own body determines the perceived size of the world. PLoS ONE, 6, e20195.
69.
WallachH. (1987). Perceiving a stable environment when one moves. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 1–27.
70.
WalshL. D.MoseleyG. L.TaylorJ. L.GandeviaS. C. (2011). Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. The Journal of Physiology, 589, 3009–3021.
71.
WilliamsB.RasorT.NarasimhamG. (2009). Distance perception in virtual environments: A closer look at the horizon and the error. Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (pp. 7–10). New York: ACM.
72.
YoudasJ. W.GarrettT. R.SumanV. J.BogardC. L.HallmanH. O.CareyJ. R. (1992). Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: An initial goniometric study. Physical Therapy, 72, 770–780.
