Drivers' judgments of the magnitude of disability glare caused by high-beam headlights may not match actual declines in visual performance. This study investigated younger and older drivers' beliefs about their own visual performance in the presence of headlight glare. Eleven older drivers and seventeen younger drivers judged the distance at which they would just be able to recognize the orientation of a white Landolt C if it were present adjacent to the headlamps of a stationary opposing vehicle at night. The younger participants were generally accurate in their estimates of the recognition distance of the stimulus, while older participants significantly overestimated both their own acuity and the effect of glare on their vision. From this study, we see that older drivers' judgments about the disabling effects of oncoming headlights may be systematically inaccurate. These misperceptions about headlight glare may help explain why drivers tend to underuse high beams.
BalkS. A., & TyrrellR. A. (2011a). The (in)accuracy of estimations of our own visual acuity in the presence of glare. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Las Vegas, NV
2.
BalkS. A., & TyrrellR. A. (2011b). The accuracy of drivers' judgments of the effects of headlight glare: Are we really blinded by the light? Paper presented at the 2011 Meeting of the 6th International Symposium on Driving Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Lake Tahoe, CA
3.
BalkS. A.TyrrellR. A.BrooksJ. O., & CarpenterT. L. (2008). Highlighting human form and motion information enhances the conspicuity of pedestrians at night. Perception, 37, 1276–1284
4.
BennettP. J.SekulerR., & SekulerA. B. (2007). The effects of aging on motion detection and direction identification. Vision Research, 47, 799–809
5.
BrooksJ. O.TyrrellR. A., & FrankT. A. (2005). The effects of severe visual challenges on the steering performance of visually healthy young drivers. Optometry and Vision Science, 82, 689–697
6.
BrooksJ. O.TyrrellR. A., & StephensB. R. (2006). Comparing estimated and actual visual acuity at high and low luminance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50, 1721–1725
7.
BuonarosaM. L.SayerJ. R., & FlannaganM. J. (2008). Real-world frequency of use of automotive lighting equipment. Leukos, 5, 139–146
8.
FlannaganM. J.SivakM.TraubeE. C., & KojimaS. (2000). Effects of overall low-beam intensity on seeing distance in the presence of glare. Transportation Human Factors, 2, 313–330
9.
HareC. T., & HemionR. H. (1968). Headlamp beam usage on U. S. highways. Phase III. Report No. AR-666. San Antonio, TX: Southwest Research Institute
10.
LeibowitzH. W., & OwensD. A. (1977). Nighttime driving accidents and selective degradation. Science, 197, 422–423
11.
LeibowitzH. W.OwensD. A., & TyrrellR. A. (1998). The assured clear distance ahead rule: Implications for traffic safety and the law. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 93–99
12.
LeibowitzH. W.TyrrellR. A.AndreJ. T.Groetzinger-EggersB. E., & NicholsonM. E. (1993). Dynamic visual contrast sensitivity. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety
13.
MeffordM. L.FlannaganM. J., & BogardS. E. (2006). Real-world use of high-beam headlamps. Report No. UMTRI-2006-11. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Institute
14.
NHTSA (2001). Glare from headlamps. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108: Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment—request for comments. Docket No. 01-8885. Washington, DC: National Traffic Safety Administration
15.
NHTSA (2003). Drivers' perceptions of headlight glare from oncoming and following vehicles. Report No. DOT HS 809 669. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation
16.
NHTSA (2007). Nighttime glare and driving performance. Report to Congress. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation
17.
NHTSA (2012). Traffic safety facts. Report No. DOT HS 811 625. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation
18.
OlsonP., & SivakM. (1983). Comparison of headlamp visibility distance and stopping distance. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 57, 1177–1178
19.
OwensD. A.AntonoffR. J., & FrancisE. L. (1994). Biological motion and nighttime pedestrian conspicuity. Human Factors, 36, 718–732
20.
OwensD. A., & SivakM. (1996). Differentiation of visibility and alcohol as contributors to twilight road fatalities. Human Factors, 38, 680–689
21.
OwensD. A., & TyrrellR. A. (1999). Effects of luminance, blur, and age on nighttime visual guidance: A test of the selective degradation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 115–128
ShinarD. (1984). Actual versus estimated night-time pedestrian visibility. Ergonomics, 27, 863–871
24.
ShinarD. & SchieberF. (1991). Visual requirements for safety and mobility of older drivers. Human Factors, 33, 507–520
25.
SullivanJ. M.AdachiG.MeffordM. L., & FlannaganM. J. (2004). High-beam headlamp usage on unlighted rural roadways. Lighting Resource Technology, 36, 59–67
26.
SullivanJ. M., & FlannaganM. J. (2002). The role of ambient light level in fatal crashes: Inferences from daylight saving time transitions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34, 487–498
27.
TheeuwesJ.AlferdinckJ., & PerelM. (2002). Relation between glare and driving performance. Human Factors, 44, 95–107
28.
TyrrellR. A.PattonC. W., & BrooksJ. O. (2004). Educational interventions successfully reduce pedestrians' overestimate of their own nighttime visibility. Human Factors, 46, 170–182
29.
TyrrellR. A.WoodJ. M., & CarberryT. P. (2004). On-road measures of pedestrians' estimates of their own nighttime conspicuity. Journal of Safety Research, 35, 483–490
30.
WoodJ. M.TyrrellR. A.CarberryT. P. (2005). Limitations in driver's ability to recognize pedestrians at night. Human Factors, 47, 644–653
