Keeping it Short and Sweet: Brief,Ungraded Writing Assignments Facilitate Learning

Abstract

Can short, ungraded, free-writing assignments promote learning of course material? We randomly assigned introductory psychology recitation sections (N = 978 students) to writing or thinking conditions. For all sections, teaching assistants presented students with a discussion topic based in current coursework. Students either wrote or thought about the topic for 5 min. All sections then discussed the topic for approximately 10 min. Exams included questions related to the discussion topics. Students in the writing condition attended class more often and performed better on factual and conceptual multiple-choice exam questions than students in the thinking condition, even after controlling for measures of student quality. The results suggested that brief free writing improved factual and conceptual learning.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angelo

T. A.

Cross

K. P.

(1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San. Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bensley

D. A.

Haynes

(1995). The acquisition of general purpose strategic knowledge for argumentation. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 41–45.

Butler

Phillmann

K.-B.

Smart

(2001). Active learning within a lecture: Assessing the impact of short, in-class writing exercises. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 257–259.

Carroll

D. W.

(2001). Using ignorance questions to promote thinking skills. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 98–100.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Connor-Greene

P. A.

(2005). Fostering meaningful classroom discussion: Student-generated questions, quotations, and talking points. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 173–175.

Counce

(1995). The influence of writing reinforcement courses on the teaching practices of student interns. College Student Journal, 29, 527–531.

Dallimore

E. J.

Hertenstein

J. H.

Platt

M. B.

(2004). Classroom participation and discussion effectiveness: Student-generated strategies. Communication Education, 53, 103–115.

Dunn

D. S.

(1994). Lessons learned from an interdisciplinary writing course: Implications for student writing in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 223–227.

10.

King

(1995). Inquiring minds really do want to know: Using questioning to teach critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 13–17.

11.

MacKinnon-Slaney

(1991). Discovery writing in introductory college student personnel graduate courses. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 92–94.

12.

Madigan

R. J.

Brosamer

J. J.

(1991). Holistic grading of written work in introductory psychology: Reliability, validity, and efficiency. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 91–97.

13.

Rickabaugh

C. A.

(1993). The psychology portfolio: Promoting writing and critical thinking about psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 170–172.

14.

Russell

M. K.

(2005). Test bank to accompany Psychology (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

15.

Stead

D. R.

(2005). A review of the one-minute paper. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6, 118–131.

16.

Stoddart

R. M.

Loux

A. K.

(1992). And, not but: Moving from monologue to dialogue in introductory psychology/English writing courses. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 145–149.

17.

Wade

(1995). Using writing to develop and assess critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 24–28.

18.

Waller

J. E.

(1994). Philosophies of psychology: A discovery process for undergraduates. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 33–35.

19.

Yoder

J. D.

Hochevar

C. M.

(2005). Encouraging active learning can improve students' performance on examinations. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 91–95.