Improving Students' Study Habits by Demonstrating the Mnemonic Benefits of Semantic Processing

Abstract

This article describes an in-class exercise that illustrates the advantage of semantic over nonsemantic study habits. The exercise includes a survey of students' current study strategies, followed by the presentation of an abbreviated version of Craik and Tulving's (1975) classic levels-of-processing experiment. We observed significant benefits of semantic processing over nonsemantic processing, and this result motivated an in-depth discussion regarding the limitations of students' intuitions about effective study strategies and methods for improving current strategies. The brief exercise changed students' intended strategies for future studying and helped students learn the concept of semantic processing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Callender

A. A.

McDaniel

M. A.

(2007a). The benefits of embedded question adjuncts for low and high structure builders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 339–348.

Callender

A. A.

McDaniel

M. A.

(2007b). The limited benefits of rereading educational texts. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Chaffin

Herrmann

D. J.

(1983). A classroom demonstration of depth of processing. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 105–107.

Craik

F. I. M.

Tulving

(1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.

Craik

F. I. M.

Watkins

M. J.

(1973). The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 599–607.

Francis

Neath

Mackewn

Goldthwaithe

(2004). CogLab. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Karpicke

J. D.

(2007). Students' use of self-testing as a strategy to enhance learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.

Neath

(1998). Human memory: An introduction to research, data, and theory (pp. 111–134). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.