We assessed changes in paranormal beliefs and general critical thinking skills among students (n = 23) enrolled in an experimental course designed to teach distinguishing science from pseudoscience and a comparison group of students (n = 30) in an advanced research methods course. On average, both courses were successful in reducing paranormal beliefs and increasing both abstract and psychology-specific critical thinking skills. However, the only difference that emerged between the courses was that the experimental course was superior with regard to reducing specific paranormal beliefs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanzigerG. (1983). Normalizing the paranormal: Short-term and long-term change in belief in the paranormal among older learners during a short course. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 212–214.
2.
BurbachM.MatkinG.FritzS. (2004). Teaching critical thinking in an introductory leadership course utilizing active learning strategies: A confirmatory study. College Student Journal, 38, 482–493.
3.
EnnisR. H. (1990). The extent to which critical thinking is subject-specific: Further clarification. Educational Researcher, 19, 10–12.
4.
GadzellaB. M.HoganL.MastenW.StacksJ.StephensR.ZascavageV. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal-Forms for different academic groups. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33, 141–143.
5.
GouldingA.ParkerA. (2001). Finding psi in the paranormal: Psychometric measures used in research in paranormal beliefs/experiences and in research on psi-ability. European Journal of Parapsychology, 16, 73–101.
6.
GriggsR. A.JacksonS. L.MarekP.ChristopherA. N. (1998). Critical thinking in introductory psychology texts and supplements. Teaching of Psychology25, 254–265.
7.
HalpernD. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53, 449–455.
8.
LawsonT. (1999). Assessing psychological critical thinking as a learning outcome for psychology majors. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 207–209.
9.
LilienfeldS. O. (1998). Pseudoscience in contemporary clinical psychology: What it is and what we can do about it. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3–9.
10.
LilienfeldS. O.LohrJ. M.MorierD. (2001). The teaching of courses in the science and pseudoscience of psychology: Useful resources. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 182–191.
11.
LooR.ThorpeK. (1999). A psychometric investigation of scores on the Watson—Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal, New Form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 995–1003.
12.
McBurneyD. H. (1996). How to think like a psychologist: Critical thinking in psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
McFallR. M. (1991). Manifesto for a science of clinical psychology. The Clinical Psychologist, 44, 75–88.
14.
MorierD.KeeportsD. (1994). Normal science and the paranormal: The effect of a scientific method course on students' beliefs in the paranormal. Research in Higher Education, 35, 443–453.
15.
NummedalS. G.HalpernD. F. (Eds.). (1995). Psychologists teach critical thinking [Special issue]. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 82–83.
16.
PenningrothS.DespainL.GrayM. (2007). A course designed to improve psychological critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 153–157.
17.
RenaudR. D.MurrayH. G. (2007). The validity of higher-order questions as a process indicator of educational quality. Research in Higher Education, 48, 319–351.
18.
ResnickL. B. (1987). Education and learning how to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19.
ShermerM. (1997). Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York: Freeman.
20.
StanovichK. E. (2001). How to think straight about psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
SwordsM. D. (1990). Using the study of anomalies to enhance critical thinking in the classroom. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 4, 123–136.
TobacykJ.MilfordG. (1983). Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1029–1037.
24.
WatsonG.GlaserE. M. (1994). Watson—Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal, Form S. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
25.
WespR.MontgomeryK. (1998). Developing critical thinking through the study of paranormal phenomena. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 275–278.
