Variation in working memory capacity (WMC) and cognitive control was examined in four experiments. In the experiments high- and low-WMC individuals performed a choice reaction time task (Experiment 1), a version of the antisaccade task (Experiment 2), a version of the Stroop task (Experiment 3), and an arrow version of the flanker task (Experiment 4). An examination of response time distributions suggested that high- and low-WMC individuals primarily differed in the slowest responses in each experiment, consistent with the notion that WMC is related to active maintenance abilities. Examination of two indicators of microadjustments of control (posterror slowing and conflict adaptation effects) suggested no differences between high- and low-WMC individuals. Collectively these results suggest that variation in WMC is related to some, but not all, cognitive control operations. The results are interpreted within the executive attention theory of WMC.
BlaisC.HarrisM.B.GuerreroJ.V.BungeS.Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, in press.
2.
BlancoM.J.AlvarezA.A.Psychometric intelligence and visual focused attention: Relationships in nonsearch tasks.Intelligence,199418, 77–106.
3.
BleckleyM.K.DursoF.T.CrutchfieldJ.M.EngleR.W.KhannaM.M.Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,200310, 884–889.
4.
BotvinickM.M.BraverT.S.BarchD.M.CarterC.S.CohenJ.D.Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.Psychological Review,2001108, 624–652.
5.
BrewerN.SmithG.A.How normal and retarded individuals monitor and regulate speed and accuracy of responding in serial choice tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1984113, 71–93.
6.
BrewerN.SmithG.A.Developmental changes in processing speed: Influence of speed–accuracy regulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1989118, 298–310.
7.
CarterC.S.Van VeenV.Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,20077, 367–379.
8.
CohenJ.D.Aston-JonesG.GilzenratM.S.A systems-level perspective on attention and cognitive control: Guided activation, adaptive gating, conflict monitoring, and exploitation vs. exploration.Cognitive neuroscience of attention,PosnerM.I.Guilford PressNew York, NY200471–90.
9.
CohenJ.D.BotvinickM.CarterC.S.Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: Who's in control?.Nature Neuroscience,20003, 421–423.
10.
CohenJ.D.DunbarK.McclellandJ.L.On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,199097, 332–361.
11.
ColfleshG.J. H.ConwayA.R. A.Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,200714, 699–703.
12.
ConwayA. R. A.CowanN.BuntingM.F.The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,20018, 331–335.
13.
DebenerS.UllspergerM.SiegelM.FiehlerK.von CramonD.Y.EngelA.K.Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring.Journal of Neuroscience,200525, 11730–11737.
14.
De JongR.BerendsenE.CoolsR.Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations.Acta Psychologica,1999101, 379–394.
15.
DingesD.F.PowellJ.W.Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,198517, 652–655.
16.
di PellegrinoG.CiaramelliE.LàdavasE.The regulation of cognitive control following rostral anterior cingulate cortex lesion in humans.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,200719, 275–286.
17.
DuncanJ.Attention, intelligence, and the frontal lobes.The cognitive neurosciences,GazzanigaIn M.MIT PressCambridge, MA1995721–733.
18.
EgnerT.HirschJ.Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information.Nature Neuroscience,20058, 1784–1790.
19.
EngleR.W.KaneM.J.Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control.The psychology of learning and motivation,RossB.ElsevierNew York, NY200444, 145–199.
20.
EngleR.W.TuholskiS.W.LaughlinJ.E.ConwayA. R. A.Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1999128, 309–331.
21.
EriksenB.A.EriksenC.W.Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,197416, 143–149.
22.
EverlingS.FischerB.The antisaccade: A review of basic research and clinical studies.Neuropsychologia,199836, 885–899.
23.
FukudaK.VogelE.K.Human variation in overriding attentional capture.Journal of Neuroscience,200929, 8726–8733.
24.
GallistelC.R.The importance of proving the null.Psychological Review,2009116, 439–453.
25.
GehringW.J.KnightR.T.Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring.Nature Neuroscience,20003, 516–520.
26.
GrattonG.ColesM. G. H.DonchinE.Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1992121, 480–506.
27.
HaleS.A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed.Child Development,199061, 653–663.
28.
HalletP.E.Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions.Vision Research,197818, 1279–1296.
29.
HasherL.LustigC.ZacksR.T.Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention.Variation in working memory,ConwayA.R. A.JarroldC.KaneM. J.MiyakeA.TowseJ.N.OxfordNew York, NY2007.
30.
HeitzR.P.Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual attention,2003Unpublished master's thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
31.
HeitzR.P.EngleR.W.Focusing the spotlight: Individual differences in visual attention control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2007136, 217–240.
32.
JensenA.R.The g factor,PraegerWestport, CT1998.
33.
KaneM.J.BleckleyM.K.ConwayA.R. A.EngleR.W.A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2001130, 2169–183.
34.
KaneM.J.ConwayA.R. A.HambrickD.Z.EngleR.W.Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control.Variation in working memory,ConwayA.R. AJarroldC.KaneM. J.MiyakeA.TowseJ.N.Oxford University PressNew York, NY2007.
35.
KaneM.J.EngleR.W.Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2003132, 47–70.
36.
KaneM.J.PooleB.J.TuholskiS.W.EngleR.W.Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of “executive attention”.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,200632, 749–777.
37.
KernsJ.G.CohenJ.D.MacdonaldA.W.IIIJohnsonM.K.StengerV.A.AizensteinH.Decreased conflict- and error-related activity in the anterior cingulate cortex in subjects with schizophrenia.American Journal of Psychiatry,2005162, 1833–1839.
38.
KeyeD.WilhelmO.OberauerK.van RavenzwaaijD.Individual differences in conflict monitoring: Testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.Psychological Research,200873, 762–776.
39.
LamingD.Choice reaction performance following an error.Acta Psychologica,197943, 199–224.
40.
LarsonM.J.KaufmanD.A. S.PerlsteinW.M.Conflict adaptation and cognitive control adjustments following traumatic brain injury.Journal of International Neuropsychological Society,200915, 927–937.
41.
LongD.L.PratC.S.Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation.Memory & Cognition,200230, 294–301.
42.
MayrU.AwhE.The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation.Psychological Research,200973, 794–802.
43.
MayrU.AwhE.LaureyP.Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control.Nature Neuroscience,20036, 450–452.
44.
MillerE.K.CohenJ.D.An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex functioning.Annual Review of Neuroscience,200124, 167–202.
45.
NieuwenhuisS.RidderinkhofK.R.BlomJ.BandG.P. H.KokA.Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: Evidence from an antisaccade task.Psychophysiology,200138, 752–760.
46.
PooleB.J.KaneM.J.Working memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: The influence of sustained and selective attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,200962, 1430–1454.
47.
PratteM.S.RouderJ.N.MoreyR.D.FengC.Exploring the differences in the distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,201072, 2013–2025.
48.
RabbittP.M. A.Errors and error-correction in choice-response tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology,196671, 264–272.
49.
RedickT.S.EngleR.W.Working memory capacity and attention network test performance.Applied Cognitive Psychology,200620, 713–721.
50.
RidderinkhofK.R.Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks.Psychological Research,200266, 312–323.
51.
RobertsR.J.PenningtonB.F.An integrative framework for examining prefrontal cognitive processes.Developmental Neuropsychology,199612, 105–126.
52.
RouderJ.N.SpeckmanP.L.SunD.MoreyR.D.IversonG.Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,200916, 225–237.
53.
SalthouseT.A.The processing speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review,1996103, 403–428.
54.
SchacharR.J.ChenS.LoganG.D.OrnsteinT.J.CrosbieJ.IckowiczA.Evidence for an error monitoring deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,200432, 285–293.
55.
SchmiedekF.OberauerK.WilhelmO.SüßH.M.WittmannW.W.Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2007136, 414–429.
56.
SmithG.A.BrewerN.Slowness and age: Speed–accuracy mechanisms.Psychology and Aging,199510, 238–247.
57.
SpielerD.H.BalotaD.A.FaustM.E.Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,200026, 506–526.
58.
StürmerB.LeutholdH.SoetensE.SchröterH.SommerW.Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,200228, 1345–1363.
59.
TseC.BalotaD.A.DuchekJ.M.YapM.J.MccabeD.P.Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks.Neuropsychology,201024, 300–315.
60.
UnsworthN.EngleR.W.The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.Psychological Review,2007114, 104–132.
61.
UnsworthN.HeitzR.P.SchrockJ.C.EngleR.W.An automated version of the Operation Span task.Behavior Research Methods,200537, 498–505.
62.
UnsworthN.RedickT.S.LakeyC.E.YoungD.L.Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation.Intelligence,201038, 111–122.
63.
UnsworthN.SchrockJ.C.EngleR.W.Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,200430, 1302–1321.
64.
UnsworthN.SpillersG.J.Working memory capacity: Attention, memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model.Journal of Memory and Language,201062, 392–406.
65.
WestR.MooreK.Adjustments of cognitive control in younger and older adults.Cortex,200541, 447–616.
66.
WylieS.A.RidderinkhofK.R.EckerleM.K.ManningC.A.Inefficient response inhibition in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.Neuropsychologia,200745, 1408–1419.
67.
YapM.J.BalotaD.A.TseC.S.BesnerD.On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: Evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,200834, 495–513.
