Three-dimensional (3D) bioplotting is a melt-extrusion-based additive manufacturing process used to fabricate 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. This study investigates the relationship between material rheology, process parameters, and scaffold characteristics during 3D bioplotting of polycaprolactone (PCL). The effects of two process parameters, extrusion temperature and nozzle diameter, on resultant scaffold structure and compression strength were studied using design of experiments. PCL scaffolds designed for a 24-well culture plate (Ø 14 mm × 2 mm) were bioplotted in a 0°/90° laydown pattern at three levels of extrusion temperature (80°C, 90°C, and 100°C) and two levels of nozzle inner diameter (0.3 and 0.4 mm) at a constant extrusion pressure (0.35 N/mm2) and nozzle speed (1.2 mm/s). The relationship between PCL dynamic viscosity and extrusion temperature during bioplotting was then determined using rheological measurements. The ANOVA results demonstrated that the strand width and porosity significantly varied as a function of the extrusion temperature, the nozzle inner diameter, and the interaction of the two parameters (p < 0.05). The compression modulus of scaffolds fabricated at the different experimental levels also showed an increasing trend (0.5 – 0.97 MPa) with extrusion temperature for a given nozzle diameter. Rheological analysis at the three extrusion temperatures showed the average viscosity to be significantly different at each level (p < 0.05). The apparent viscosity of PCL at the nozzle tip during 3D bioplotting was also estimated, showing a steep decrease with increasing extrusion temperature and nozzle diameter. Finally, predictive regression models to estimate the scaffold characteristics based on the 3D bioplotting process parameters were developed.
AnnabiN, VranaNE, ZorlutunaP, et al.Engineering biomimetic scaffolds. In Scaffolds for tissue engineering: biological design, materials, and fabrication. Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, 2014; pp.223–262.
12.
KimBS, MooneyDJ. Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol, 1998; 16:224–230.
13.
FreedLE, GuilakF, GuoXE, et al.Advanced tools for tissue engineering: scaffolds, bioreactors, and signaling. Tissue Eng, 2006; 12:3285–3305.
14.
ButlerDL, GoldsteinSA, GuilakF. Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics. J Biomech Eng, 2000; 122:570–575.
15.
FreedLE, GuilakF. Engineering functional tissues. In Principles of tissue engineering. Academic Press, New York, NY, 2007; pp.137–153.
16.
HofflerCE, MooreKE, KozloffK, et al.Age, gender, and bone lamellae elastic moduli. J Orthop Res, 2000; 18:432–437.
17.
LuL, MikosAG. The importance of new processing techniques in tissue engineering. MRS Bull, 1996; 21:28–32.
18.
HollisterSJ, MaddoxRD, TaboasJM. Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. Biomaterials, 2002; 23:4095–4103.
19.
HutmacherDW. Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues—state of the art and future perspectives. J Biomater Sci Poly Ed, 2001; 12:107–124.
20.
ThomsonRC, ShungAK, YaszemskiMJ. Polymer scaffold processing. In Principles of tissue engineering. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2000; pp.251–262.
21.
MikosAG, ThorsenAJ, CzerwonkaLA, et al.Preparation and characterization of poly(L-lactic acid) foams. Polymer, 1994; 35:1068–1077.
22.
LiaoCJ, ChenCF, ChenJH, et al.Fabrication of porous biodegradable polymer scaffolds using a solvent merging/particulate leaching method. J Biomed Maters Res, 2002; 59:676–681.
23.
OhSH, KangSG, KimES, et al.Fabrication and characterization of hydrophilic poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blend cell scaffolds by melt-molding particulate-leaching method. Biomaterials, 2003; 24:4011–4021.
24.
NamYS, YoonJJ, ParkTG. A novel fabrication method of macroporous biodegradable polymer scaffolds using gas foaming salt as a porogen additive. J Biomed Mater Res, 2000; 53:1–7.
25.
SalernoA, OlivieroM, Di MaioE, et al.Design of porous polymeric scaffolds by gas foaming of heterogeneous blends. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2009; 20:2043–2051.
26.
JiC, AnnabiN, HosseinkhaniM, et al.Fabrication of poly-DL-lactide/polyethylene glycol scaffolds using the gas foaming technique. Acta Biomater, 2012; 8:570–578.
27.
YoshimotoH, ShinYM, TeraiH, et al.A biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2003; 24:2077–2082.
28.
PhamQP, SharmaU, MikosAG. Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Tissue Eng, 2006; 12:1197–1211.
29.
AgarwalS, WendorffJH, GreinerA. Progress in the field of electrospinning for tissue engineering applications. Adv Mater, 2009; 21:3343–3351.
30.
LiuC, MaPX. Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng, 2004; 32:477–486.
31.
HutmacherDW, SittingerM, RisbudMV. Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. Trends Biotechnol, 2004; 22:354–362.
32.
SunW, DarlingA, StarlyB, et al.Computer-aided tissue engineering: overview, scope and challenges. Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 2004; 39:29–47.
33.
BartoloPJ, ChuaCK, AlmeidaHA, et al.Biomanufacturing for tissue engineering: present and future trends. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 2009; 4:203–216.
34.
BartoloP, BidandaB. Bio-materials and prototyping applications in medicine. Springer, New York, NY, 2008.
35.
WangF, ShorL, DarlingA, et al.Precision extruding deposition and characterization of cellular poly-ε-caprolactone tissue scaffolds. Rapid Prototyping J, 2004; 10:42–49.
36.
HoqueME, ChuanYL, PashbyI. Extrusion based rapid prototyping technique: an advanced platform for tissue engineering scaffold fabrication. Biopolymers, 2012; 97:83–93.
37.
KhalilS, NamJ, SunW. Multi-nozzle deposition for construction of 3D biopolymer tissue scaffolds. Rapid Prototyping J, 2005; 11:9–17.
38.
CarvalhoC, LandersR, MulhauptR, et al.Fabrication of soft and hard biocompatible scaffolds using 3D-bioplotting. In Virtual modeling and rapid manufacturing. Taylor and Francis, London, UK, 2005; pp.97–102.
39.
HutmacherDW, HoqueME, WongYS. Design, fabrication and physical characterization of scaffolds made from biodegradable synthetic polymers in combination with RP systems based on melt extrusion. In Virtual prototyping and biomanufacturing in medical applications. Springer, New York, NY, 2008; pp.261–291.
40.
LiMG, TianXY, ChenXB. A brief review of dispensing-based rapid prototyping techniques in tissue scaffold fabrication: role of modeling on scaffold properties prediction. Biofabrication, 2009; 1:032001.
41.
SheshadriP. Characterization of 3D-bioplotting of polycaprolactone for tissue engineering applications. MS Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 2013.
42.
JohnsonPC, MikosAG, FisherJP, et al.Strategic directions in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng, 2007; 13:2827–2837.
43.
LipsonH. The importance of standards. 3D Print Additive Manufac, 2014; 1:107.
44.
WoodruffMA, HutmacherDW. The return of a forgotten polymer—polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci, 2010; 35:1217–1256.
45.
KweonH, YooMK, ParkIK, et al.A novel degradable polycaprolactone networks for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2003; 24:801–808.
46.
DomingosM, DinucciD, CometaS, et al.Polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via bioextrusion for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biomater, 2009; 239643.
47.
WilliamsJM, AdewunmiA, SchekRM, et al.Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials, 2005; 26:4817–4827.
48.
ThadavirulN, PavasantP, SupapholP. Development of polycaprolactone porous scaffolds by combining solvent casting, particulate leaching, and polymer leaching techniques for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2014; 102:3379–3392.
49.
ASTM Standard F2450-10. Standard guide for assessing microstructure of polymeric scaffolds for use in tissue-engineered medical products. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010.
50.
HutmacherDW, SchantzT, ZeinI, et al.Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2001; 55:203–216.
51.
AhoJ. Rheological characterization of polymer melts in shear and extension: measurement reliability and data for practical processing. PhD Dissertation, Tampere University of Technology, Finland, 2011.
52.
LiangJZ. Characteristics of melt shear viscosity during extrusion of polymers. Polym Test, 2002; 21:307–311.
53.
RamanathHS, ChuaCK, LeongKF, et al.Melt flow behaviour of poly-ε-caprolactone in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2008; 19:2541–2550.
54.
TA Instruments (revised by Frank A). Understanding rheology of thermoplastic polymers. New Castle, DE, 2004.
55.
ZeinI, HutmacherDW, TanKC, et al.Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials, 2002; 23:1169–1185.
56.
Brookfield Engineering Laboratories. More solutions to sticky problems. Middleboro, MA, 2006.
57.
MireCA, AgrawalA, WallaceGG, et al.Inkjet and extrusion printing of conducting poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) tracks on and embedded in biopolymer materials. J Mater Chem, 2011; 21:2671–2678.
