Abstract
Weight loss medications are effective to confer additional weight loss after bariatric surgery in the general population, but they have not been evaluated in adults 60 years of age and older. We performed a retrospective study identifying 35 patients who were ≥60 years old and had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from 2000 to 2014, and were subsequently prescribed weight loss medications. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine beta coefficients of certain predictor variables being associated with weight loss. Patients lost weight on medications with an average body mass index (BMI) change of −2.74 kg/m2, standard deviation = 2.6 kg/m2. RYGB patients lost a greater percentage of BMI on medication than SG (SG; −1.38 ± 1.49 kg/m2 and RYGB; −3.37 ± 2.83 kg/m2, p = 0.0372). Patients with hypertension were less likely to lose weight on medications (β = 16.76, p = 0.004, and 95% confidence interval = 5.85–27.67). Weight loss medications are a useful treatment to confer additional weight loss in adults 60 years of age and older after RYGB and SG.
Introduction
Obesity is the most common chronic disease in the United States and is linked to comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and cancer.1,2 Over one third of men and women older than 60 years of age, have obesity in the United States 3 and as the population ages, the number of people older than 60 years of age with obesity continues to rise. In addition to comorbidities, obesity in older persons is associated with increased dependency on others to carry out activities of daily living. 4 Older adults with obesity are twice as likely to be admitted to nursing homes, enter nursing homes earlier, and require additional equipment, supplies, and staff. 5 Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for moderate and severe obesity in older patients.6–9 Weight loss surgery in adults older than 60 years of age is effective, safe, and in addition to weight loss, leads to the resolution or improvement of comorbidities, particularly hypertension and diabetes.10–14 While there are distinctive hormonal and metabolic changes that occur with surgery, much of the comorbidity improvement seems to be conferred by dramatic weight loss that occurs with surgical treatment compared to other weight loss therapies.15,16 Unfortunately, there is a variable response to bariatric surgery and some patients have suboptimal weight loss or experience weight regain after bariatric surgery.17,18 These patients are in need of further treatment options to confer additional weight loss or to reachieve weight loss following bariatric surgery. Pharmacotherapy is a promising treatment method that has been shown to be effective in helping achieve additional weight loss in patients from a wide range of ages following bariatric surgery. 19 In this study, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of weight loss medications in patients older than 60 years of age, who had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery or sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and were subsequently prescribed weight loss medications. We hypothesized that the use of weight loss medications would yield further weight loss following RYGB and SG. The primary consideration in this article is whether medications are beneficial in older patients (≥60 years of age) as an adjunct to weight loss surgery for inadequate weight loss or weight regain, as this population tends to have more contraindications to the chronic use of weight loss medications and there is a concern with polypharmacy in this population.
Methods
Sample and data collection
The patients in our study sample came from two major academic medical centers where they underwent RYGB or SG procedures between November 2000 and June 2014. From our sample, all patients who were 60 years of age or older and were subsequently placed on weight loss medications after surgery were considered for inclusion. All patients had at least 12 months of documented postoperative follow-up. Patients were excluded if they did not have sufficient follow-up considered to be at least one annual visit, had additional surgery for complications within 6 months of their initial surgery, or if they required a revision surgery. Two research groups obtained the clinical data from the medical record and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at both academic centers.
Demographic and clinical factors
We obtained the following data from the medical records of eligible patients: (1) type of surgery (RYGB or SG); (2) date of operation; (3) date of birth; (4) gender; (5) race/ethnicity (Caucasian, Hispanic, Black, Asian, or other); (6) preoperative obesity-related comorbidities (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, OSA, dyslipidemia, and NAFLD); (7) preoperative use of weight loss medications; (8) body mass index (BMI; based on initial height and weight at the following time points: presurgery, at plateau postsurgery, at the start of weight loss medication, at plateau after weight loss medication, and current); (9) time to achieve plateau weight postsurgery; (10) postoperative resolution of obesity comorbidities; (11) continued use of weight loss medication(s); (12) psychiatric comorbidity (anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder); (13) use of psychotropic medications presurgery; and (14) use of psychotropic medications postsurgery.
Weight loss medications
We collected information on 15 medications that are prescribed by obesity medicine physicians at the two academic centers. We reviewed the entire electronic medical record to determine if there was history of the medication being prescribed and filled at the pharmacy by the patient. The medications included were as follows: (1) phentermine, (2) topiramate, (3) zonisamide, (4) metformin, (5) bupropion, (6) orlistat, (7) sibutramine, (8) liraglutide, (9) exenatide, (10) pramlintide, (11) naltrexone, (12) lorcaserin, (13) phentermine/topiramate, (14) canagliflozin, and (15) bupropion/naltrexone.
Primary endpoints
The primary endpoint was relative change in weight. Additional secondary efficacy endpoints were changes in BMI and the resolution of obesity related comorbidities, which, listed with the criteria that we used to determine resolution, were as follows: (1) hypertension—no longer requiring medication to maintain a normal blood pressure of <120/80; (2) type 2 diabetes—no longer requiring medications to maintain a hemoglobin A1c of <6.5; (3) OSA—no longer requiring continuous positive airway pressure as assessed by overnight polysomnography; (4) dyslipidemia—normalization of lipid values without lipid-lowering therapy; and (5) NAFLD—normalization of liver function tests. (6) Mental illness—no longer requiring medication or undergoing therapy to treat the condition.
Statistical analysis
The data we collected were used to create variables for analysis. Patient weight histories, including nadir weight after surgery before medical treatment denoted as “nadir-pre,” weight at initiation of weight loss medication treatment, and weight at nadir after weight loss medication treatment denoted as “nadir-post,” were summarized with descriptive statistics overall and broken out by surgery type (RYGB or SG). Baseline demographic characteristics and preoperative baseline characteristics were also included. The treatment period of medications was determined by the time between the date weight loss medications were initiated to the date when nadir-post weight was achieved. Patients were split into two groups based on when weight loss medication treatment was started postsurgery. The distinction between the two groups was whether medication was started at plateau weight or after weight regain had already occurred. Patients were at plateau weight if their weight was no more than 3% greater than their postsurgery nadir-pre weight. Patients who were not within 3% of their postsurgery nadir-pre weight were considered to have started medication after weight regain. The patients in the study did not have to be within 3% of their nadir-pre weight for a certain period of time postoperative because the time to achieve nadir-pre varies among patients as well as by type of surgery. Patients did, however, need to demonstrate at least 3 months of weight stability.
Linear regression analyses were performed to build a model with medications used over the treatment period as our candidate predictor variables for weight loss. We adjusted for the type of surgery performed and patient BMI at the start of weight loss medication treatment by including them as covariates in our model. These variables were controlled for because they have influenced weight loss using weight loss medication in other studies. 19 We then performed linear regression analyses with candidate predictor variables based on our demographic and baseline characteristics. Beta coefficients (β) and corresponding p values were estimated. Negative beta coefficients were indicative of increased weight loss and positive beta coefficients were indicative of decreased weight loss. All analyses were performed in Stata Version 11.
Results
Participants
Baseline characteristics of study patients are noted in Table 1. Of the 5110 patient records that were reviewed, 35 (0.6%) met criteria for inclusion. Almost three quarters of patients were female (n = 26; 74.3%) and a little over one quarter of patients were male (n = 9; 25.7%). All patients were 60 years of age or older at the start of medication therapy with 19 (54.3%) patients between 60 and 64 years of age, 14 (40%) patients between 65 and 69 years of age, and 2 (5.7%) patients being 70 years of age or older. Patients were predominantly white, 19 (82.8%) of the patients identified as Caucasian, 1 (2.9%) identified as Hispanic, 4 (11.4%) identified as African American, and 1 (2.9%) declined to answer or identified as a different race. At the time of surgery, RYGB patients had a slightly higher mean BMI (44.8 kg/m2; standard deviation [SD] = 6.9) versus (43.2 kg/m2; SD = 4.3). Before surgery, the RYGB group also had higher percentages of obesity-related comorbidities and took longer to reach their weight plateau after surgery. At the start of medication, as denoted in Table 2, the mean weight and BMI of RYGB (BMI = 34.7 kg/m2; SD = 5.8) and SG (BMI = 36.6 kg/m2; SD = 3.6) were similar, but RYGB patients had a longer time elapse between surgery (38.5 months; SD = 28.6) and the start of medication compared with patients who had SG (26.2 months; SD = 13.2). At the nadir-post weight achieved after weight loss medication, the mean BMI for patients in the RYGB group was also similar to that of the SG group, RYGB (BMI = 31.3 kg/m2; SD = 5.7) and SG (BMI = 35.2 kg/m2; SD = 3.8).
Demographic Data and Baseline Characteristics for Patients >60
Based on variable Psychiatric Comorbidity—Yes/No.
BMI, body mass index; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SD, standard deviation.
Postoperative Patient Characteristics and Weight History After Surgery, Before Medications, and After Treatment
Missing data for one patient.
n = 35.
Weight loss medications and response
Both the RYGB and SG groups were often trialed on several medications over the course of treatment. The average number of medications was 2.2 (SD = 1.3) (Table 3). Patients were more likely to be prescribed medications after weight regain (71.4%; n = 25) had occurred than at plateau (28.6%; n = 10) (Table 4). Overall, the patients in this cohort lost weight on medication, with an average BMI change of −2.74 kg/m2, SD = 2.6 kg/m2. Patients prescribed medications at their plateau weight saw a slightly greater (−3.53 ± 3.39 kg/m2) decrease in BMI compared to patients who were prescribed medication after weight regain (−2.43 ± 2.27 kg/m2) (p = 0.2730), but this difference was not found to be significant (Table 4).
Weight Loss Medications Use
Mean Body Mass Index Change After Treatment by Subgroup
Calculated this number as ([(BMI at nadir postmedications) − (BMI at start of medication)]/(BMI at start of medication)) × 100.
Plateau defined as weight that is within 3% above or below nadir weight postoperatively before medication. If above 3% patient defined as starting medication at weight regain.
Two-sample t-test of means conducted for posttreatment weight change (BMI).
Calculated by postmedication BMI at nadir—preoperative BMI.
CI, confidence interval.
The most frequently prescribed medications were topiramate, phentermine, metformin, bupropion, zonisamide, lorcaserin, and liraglutide (Table 5). In our model, which was adjusted for type of surgery and BMI at the start of medication, beta coefficients are shown in Table 5 for each medication as a predictor of weight loss. A significant beta coefficient was observed for liraglutide, (β = −16.07, p = 0.009, confidence interval [CI] = −25.17 to 3.57).
Linear Regression Analysis with Medication as Predictor
Predictors of weight loss medication response
RYGB patients had greater BMI decreases on medication than SG that were statistically significant, (SG; −1.38 ± 1.49 kg/m2, RYGB; −3.37 ± 2.83 kg/m2, p = 0.0372) (Table 4). We also evaluated other specific predictors of response to weight loss medications as summarized in Table 6. No statistically significant difference in beta values was found for gender, age range, weight when medications were prescribed, race, BMI at baseline preoperatively, BMI at start of medications, or time to achieve nadir-pre weight after surgery before medications were prescribed. The number of comorbidities at the time of surgery did not yield statistically significant changes to beta values; however, hypertension at the time of surgery did have a significantly large beta value (β = 16.76, p = 0.004, CI = 5.85–27.67, R 2 = 0.3485).
Linear Regression by Predictor Variable
Adjusted for BMI at start of medications.
Adjusted time elapse between surgery date and start of medications.
Adjusted for type of surgery by including as covariate.
Adjusted for type of surgery and gender.
n = 35.
NA, not applicable.
Discussion
The use of weight loss medications has been shown to help patients across a broad range of ages lose additional weight after bariatric procedures, but the use of weight loss medications in patients 60 years of age and older has not been thoroughly studied.19–23 Our study demonstrates the utility of weight loss medications for additional weight loss in patients 60 years of age or older, following RYGB and SG. The mean BMI change achieved with medications was −2.74 ± 2.6 kg/m2. Figure 1 depicts a representative example of a 72-year-old patient included in our study, who achieved weight loss with the use of pharmacotherapy after RYGB surgery. We did not find a statistically significant difference in BMI decrease when medications were prescribed at weight plateau (−3.53 ± 3.39 kg/m2) versus at weight regain (−2.43 ± 2.27 kg/m2; p = 0.2730), which is in line with previous findings on weight loss medication use postsurgery.19–23 While further prospective studies are needed, response to pharmacotherapy after weight loss surgery may be governed by a threshold paradigm that has been observed in other weight loss therapies where higher starting BMIs result in anabolic responses due to adiposity-related signals that occur at a higher threshold. 24 Thus, initiating pharmacotherapy at the initial nadir-pre weight instead of following weight regain after surgery may be the ideal time to commence therapy to achieve maximal overall weight loss; however, our research did not prove this as the differences in weight loss observed were not statistically significant.

Graphical representation of weight loss medication after bariatric surgery in a 72-year-old RYGB patient. Note: The patient's weight loss from RYGB was from a BMI of 46–31 (class 1: mild obesity). She regained weight to a BMI of 35 (class 2: moderate obesity). She lost weight after starting on topiramate to a current BMI of 28. BMI, body mass index; EBWL, excess body weight loss; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; TBWL, total body weight loss.
Liraglutide was the only medication to show a significant negative beta coefficient in our linear regression analysis using medication as a predictor of weight loss (β = −16.07, p = 0.009, and CI = −27.76 to −4.38). It is important to note that after Bonferroni correction, the p-value adopted for this analysis is 0.005 and therefore, Liraglutide seems to be approaching a significant beta coefficient, but still remains the only medication in this analysis that comes close to a p-value of 0.005. The negative beta coefficient may portend a higher likelihood of weight loss when using Liraglutide in this older cohort. Liraglutide is an acylated glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue that has a different mechanism of action than many of the other weight loss medications trialed. 25 Furthermore, in a previous study of multiple weight loss medications used in a broader age range of patients, topiramate appeared to confer the highest weight loss potential. 19 Therefore, the question of whether Liraglutide is particularly efficacious in older populations of patients following bariatric surgery needs further study.
We did not find the number of comorbidities present before weight loss surgery to influence weight loss postsurgery. However, the presence of hypertension before weight loss surgery resulted in a significant positive beta coefficient (β = 16.76, p = 0.004, and CI = 5.85–27.67), which suggests that the presence of hypertension before surgery may decrease the likelihood of weight loss with medication therapy. Patients with hypertension do present a clinical challenge as many weight loss medications that might be considered might worsen hypertension or be a relative or absolute contraindication to their use. This is particularly germane to the use of stimulant medications such as phentermine. Research is limited, but this result is paradoxical to findings in a study by Shantavasinkul where hypertension was correlated with sustained weight loss after bariatric surgery. 26 Prospective research studies regarding comorbidities and response to weight loss medication following bariatric surgery are needed to further explore this issue.
There are many limitations to our study due to its retrospective nature. Limitations include missing patient data, no control group, an inability to account for the length of time that patients were on weight loss medications, and confounding factors, including concurrent treatment with weight promoting medications, as well as weight loss medications being evaluated for weight loss potential when they may have been prescribed for other indications. We were also unable to measure the effect of diet and exercise and some medications were prescribed more than others. Despite these limitations, our study data came from two large academic study sites performing the two most common weight loss procedures in the United States, and included a long duration of follow-up, which gave us the ability to assess the long-term efficacy of weight loss medication after bariatric surgery. In addition, patients in our study received multiple weight loss medications, which helped us explore the efficacy of weight loss medications as well as the individual variability of responses to different medications.
Conclusions
Weight loss medications are a useful tool to confer additional weight loss in adults 60 years of age and older following inadequate weight loss or weight regain after RYGB and SG. RYGB patients in this age group appear to respond better to weight loss medications, but medication is still effective for conferring additional weight loss in SG patients. Liraglutide may be particularly useful for additional weight loss in adults 60 years of age and older following bariatric surgery, and further studies are needed to confirm this. The presence of hypertension before bariatric surgery may lower the likelihood of achieving weight loss on medications and further studies are needed to explore this finding.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
Funding: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK103946-01A1) and the National Institutes of Health (P30 DK040561). This work was, in part, supported by NIH NIDDK R01 DK103946-01A1 and P30 DK040561.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
