Abstract
Background and Purpose:
Urinary oxalate excretion is a risk factor for nephrolithiasis and is a result of endogenous metabolism and gastrointestinal processes. Gastrointestinal absorption of oxalate has been well demonstrated but to our knowledge evidence for secretion of oxalate is absent in humans. The objective of this study was to measure the amount and conformation of oxalate in the stomach and small intestine of adult subjects undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Materials and Methods:
Eleven adults participated in this study. Gastrointestinal fluid was collected from the stomach and small intestine during endoscopy. A determination of the soluble and insoluble components of oxalate was made by centrifugation of the sample and subsequent acidification of the resultant pellet and supernatant. Samples were processed and the amount of oxalate was measured by ion chromatography, the limit of which is 1.6 μM.
Results:
The majority of small intestinal samples contained some degree of oxalate. This is in contrast to the stomach where minimal oxalate was detected. There was a wide range of oxalate concentrations and a greater degree of insoluble oxalate in small intestinal samples.
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that some degree of oxalate secretion in the small intestine may occur in the fasted state while this is less likely in the stomach. Further studies are warranted to provide definitive evidence of gastrointestinal secretion of oxalate.
Introduction
C
Materials and Methods
Study subjects
Eleven adults (7 males and 4 females), mean age 59 years (range, 20–77 years) undergoing endoscopy of the stomach or both the stomach and the small bowel participated in this study. All subjects underwent their endoscopic procedures for gastrointestinal related indications that are not known to influence oxalate handling. The indications for endoscopic studies were as follows: anemia and/or suspected gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 6), abdominal pain (n = 3), dyspepsia (n = 1), and jaundice (n = 1). All subjects were free of end-stage renal disease, prior intestinal resection, or suspected gastrointestinal motility disorders. The five most common medical comorbidities reported were hypertension (n = 7), anemia (n = 5), diabetes (n = 5), peptic ulcer disease/gastroesophageal reflux disease (n = 5), and dyslipidemia (n = 3). Only two subjects had a history of stone disease, one with known composition (calcium oxalate). No subjects reported taking recent antibiotics, probiotics, calcium, or vitamin C supplements. All fasted for a minimum of 8 hours before endoscopy. The patients did not receive bowel preparation due to antegrade nature of endoscopy. All subjects provided informed consent before participating in this study, which was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Review Board.
Sample procurement
Samples obtained from the stomach were obtained via traditional esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Samples obtained from the small intestine were obtained via antegrade double-balloon enteroscopy (also known as push-and-pull enteroscopy). 9 Examinations were performed by faculty of the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine. There was no mention of insufficient evacuation of food or fecal material in the procedural reports.
Sample analysis
Samples obtained were processed within an hour for oxalate analysis. Samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 21,000× g in a bench top micro-centrifuge at room temperature. The supernatant was transferred and then mixed with 3.25 μL of 2 M HCl for every 100 μL of supernatant. The pellet was washed with ethanol and dissolved by acidification with 2 M HCl at a ratio of 2:1 to ensure complete dissolution of crystalline oxalate present in the pellet. A further centrifugation for 10 minutes at 21,000× g at room temperature removed any remaining solid material. Samples were ultra-filtered using Corning® Spin-X® UF centrifugal concentrators (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Total oxalate in all samples was measured via ion chromatography as previously described. 10 The limit of detection of this technique is 1.6 μM.
Results
Four gastric samples and 11 small intestinal samples were collected from 11 patients (Tables 1 and 2). Of the gastric samples only one of four (25%) had detectable oxalate, a concentration of 4.9 μM soluble conformation. There was no insoluble oxalate detected in the gastric samples. In contrast, 8 of 11 (72.7%) small intestinal samples contained some amount of measurable oxalate, soluble oxalate detected ranged from 1.7 to 191 μM and insoluble oxalate detected ranged from 56 to 3243 μM. Two of the eight (25%) contained only soluble oxalate, two of the eight (25%) contained only insoluble oxalate and the remaining four (50%) contained both conformations. The ratio of quantities of total insoluble to total soluble oxalate was calculated in a subset of three small intestinal samples, which contained soluble and insoluble oxalates. In these samples insoluble oxalate was noted to be 36–52× greater than the amount of soluble oxalate. Only one subject had a reported history of calcium oxalate stone disease. The subject's gastric sample contained no detectable oxalate and the small intestinal sample showed no detectable soluble oxalate and a 76 μM concentration of insoluble oxalate.
Discussion
Oxalate is transported in the gastrointestinal tract via paracellular and transcellular processes. Paracellular transport is largely dependent on the ionized status of oxalate, membrane permeability, and electric potential gradient. 5 Paracellular transport of oxalate is not felt to occur in the stomach due to decreased membrane permeability as a result of tight junctions and active transport mechanisms have not been identified thus far. 11 The results of prior oxalate loading studies in humans suggest that the majority of oxalate is absorbed in the colon and small intestine based on time sequences relative to known ranges of intestinal transit time. 6,12 Though our sample size is low, the absence of detectable oxalate in the majority of stomach samples suggests that minimal oxalate secretion is occurring at this level of the gastrointestinal tract during a fasted state. However, it is possible that the acidic environment of the stomach converts any crystalline oxalate to soluble oxalate, which could be readily absorbed and thus resulting in a low luminal concentration in this segment of the gastrointestinal tract. 11
In contrast to the stomach, oxalate was more prevalent and abundant in the small intestine. These findings infer that oxalate secretion may be occurring in this portion of the gastrointestinal system. The other possibility is that the oxalate present was derived from prior meals, although it is anticipated that the food-related succus should have cleared after 8 hours based on the range of reported normal oral-cecal transport time, 3–7 hours. 13
Intestinal samples contained greater amounts of insoluble oxalate suggesting that any secreted oxalate complexes with cations resulting in the formation of crystalline oxalate, the latter not being absorbed. Thus, the driving forces for this interaction include both the concentration of oxalate and pertinent cations, namely calcium and perhaps pH. These intraluminal crystalline events can be attenuated with low calcium intake or availability. 4 The consequences of the latter could result in increased oxalate absorption and subsequent urinary excretion heightening stone risk. 2 This underscores the importance of maintenance of normal calcium intake for stone prevention in most patients. 14
Much research has been done in recent years regarding mechanisms of intestinal oxalate transport in animal models. The SLC26a family of ion exchangers has been identified to play an important role in oxalate transport. Knockout studies in rodents have identified specific subtypes that mediate absorption and secretion. Mice with SLC26a3 (DRA) deletions show net oxalate secretion in the colon and small intestine with resultant decreases in urinary oxalate excretion, suggesting this transporter's role in oxalate absorption. 15 Net flux of oxalate across ileal epithelium is primarily absorptive in knockout models of SLC26a6 deletions (PAT1) suggesting its role in secretion. Additionally, urinary oxalate excretion was increased by the absence of the PAT1 transporter. 16 Further studies of this model show that SLC26a6-null mice not only have increased oxalate urinary excretion, but may also develop calculous disease and these changes may be mitigated by decreased oral oxalate consumption. 17 Certain other factors may play a role in simulating intestinal secretion of oxalate including metabolic acidosis, carbonic anhydrase, oxalalobacter formigenes, and its lysate. 18 –20 However, since oxalalobacter formigenes is not thought to be present in the small intestine or stomach, a direct effect on gastric or small intestinal oxalate secretion is unlikely. Other compounds such as sulfate and thiosulfate may inhibit such transport. 21 The degree to which different parts of the intestinal tract contribute to oxalate secretion has not yet been fully characterized.
We found a wide range of oxalate concentrations in the intestine suggesting that there may be substantial inter-individual variability in intestinal oxalate transport. A wide degree of genetic variability in SLC26 transporters has been observed in recurrent calcium oxalate stone formers that may be a source for this variability. 22
We acknowledge that this study has limitations. Samples were procured at various depths of the small intestine and the depth at which they were obtained was unknown. Thus, it is possible that the variability of oxalate concentrations in small intestine may be due to location within the intestine from where the sample was obtained and subtle differences in intestinal motility. Oxalate detected may partially have been due to residual food in the gastrointestinal tract, though the effect of this is felt to be negligible as patients were fasted and had no overt evidence of gastrointestinal motility dysfunction.
Future studies are planned to overcome some of these limitations. We plan to obtain samples after subjects are administered intravenous infusion of 13C-labeled oxalate, which if present in the intestinal lumen would provide definitive evidence of gastrointestinal oxalate secretion.
Conclusions
The majority of oxalate in the intestine during a fasted state is insoluble. Our results infer that gastrointestinal oxalate secretion occurs in humans in a fasted state but less likely in the stomach. Further studies are needed to prove this concept.
Footnotes
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
