Abstract

P
These results are thought provoking and stir the notion that other instances apart from ATI may contribute to recurrence as seen in patients who receive PN. Although there are many reasons for higher rates of recurrence in patients who receive PN through robotic or laparoscopic surgery, 1 –6 the act of renal incision remains heavily scrutinized. In a separate clinical observational study, Ito and colleagues evaluated the long-term impact of ATI in a cohort of 156 patients who underwent laparoscopic PN for renal cell carcinoma. From this cohort, 12 patients had a documented ATI event; positive surgical margins and local tumor recurrence rates were found in none of these cases. 7 Although this study appears to assuage any concerns of tumor cell spillage as it occurs during ATI in the perioperative setting, the results generated by Yoshino et al. underscore the viability of tumor cells present on surgical equipment and their proliferative potential in vitro. Furthermore, the means at which tumor cells are eliminated for sterilization purposes are apt and appear to be reliable.
