Commentary on “Middle Vault Changes After Humpectomy by Spare Roof Technique Versus Component Dorsal Hump Reduction” by Dias et al: Which Method of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Is Best?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2021
Commentary on “Middle Vault Changes After Humpectomy by Spare Roof Technique Versus Component Dorsal Hump Reduction” by Dias et al: Which Method of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Is Best?
DiasD, RosaF, Sousa e CastroS, et al.Middle vault changes after humpectomy by spare roof technique vs. component dorsal hump reduction. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021; 23(3):161–166.
2.
KosinsAM, DanielRK. Decision making in preservation rhinoplasty: a 100 case series with one-year follow-up. Aesthet Surg J. 2020; 40(1):34–48.
3.
PatelPN, AbdelwahabM, MostSP. A review and modification of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020; 22:71–79.
4.
FerreiraMG, SantosM, CarmoDOE, et al.Spare roof technique versus component dorsal hump reduction: a randomized prospective study in 250 primary rhinoplasties, aesthetic and functional outcomes. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;sjaa221 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa221.
5.
AbdelwahabMA, NevesCA, PatelPN, MostSP. Impact of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty versus dorsal hump resection on the internal nasal valve: a quantitative radiological study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020; 44(3):879–887.
