Traditionally, diabetes education has relied on written materials, with limited resources available for children with diabetes. Mobile games can be effective and motivating tools for the promotion of children's health. In our earlier work, we proposed a novel approach for designing computer games aimed at educating children with diabetes. In this article, we apply our game design to a mobile Android game (Mario Brothers). We also introduce four heuristics that are specifically designed for evaluating the mobile game, by adapting traditional usability heuristics. Results of a pilot study (n = 12) to evaluate gameplay over 1-week showed that the children found the game engaging and improved their knowledge of healthy diet and lifestyle.
BaranowskiT, BaranowskiJ, ThompsonD, et al.Video game play, child diet, and physical activity behavior change: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Prev Med, 2011; 40:33–38.
3.
RaaffC, GlazebrookC, WharradH. A systematic review of interactive multimedia interventions to promote children's communication with health professionals: Implications for communicating with overweight children. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2014; 14:8.
4.
GreysenSR, KhannaRR, JacolbiaR, et al.Tablet computers for hospitalized patients: A pilot study to improve inpatient engagement. J Hosp Med, 2014; 9:396–399.
5.
ChenG, BaghaeiN, SarrafzadehA, et al.Designing games to educate diabetic children. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference; Canberra, Australia. 2011, pp. 72–75.
6.
MaloneTTW. Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games. In: CHI ‘82 Proceedings of the 1982 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; New York: ACM Press, 1982, pp. 63–68.
7.
ClantonC. An interpreted demonstration of computer game design. Most, 1998; 7–8.
8.
FederoffMA. Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games. FUN in Video Games [MS Thesis]. Graduate School of Indiana University; December2002, p. 52.
9.
DesurvireH, BlvdW, ReyM, CaplanM. Using Heuristics to Evaluate the Playability of Games. Defense, 2004; 8:1509–1512.
10.
KorhonenH, KoivistoEMI. Playability heuristics for mobile games. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Helsinki, Finland). ACM, 2006, pp. 9–16.
11.
KorhonenH, KoivistoEMI. Playability heuristics for mobile multi-player games. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Int Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts; Perth, Australia. 2007, pp. 28–35.
12.
SchafferN. Heuristics for Usability in Games. 2007, pp. 1–30. www.playerfriendly.com (accessed March1, 2016).
13.
PinelleD, WongN, StachT. Heuristic evaluation for games: Usability principles for video game design. In: Proceeding of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Florence, Italy. 2008, pp. 1453–1462.
14.
PinelleD, WongN, StachT, GutwinC. Usability heuristics for networked multiplayer games. In: Proceedings of the ACM; 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2009), Sanibel Island, FL, 2009, pp. 169–178.
15.
IbrahimA, Gutiérrez VelaFL, González SánchezJL, et al.Educational playability analyzing player experiences in educational video games. In: ACHI 2012, The Fifth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions; 2012, pp. 326–335.
16.
SoomroS, AhmadWFW, SulaimanS. A preliminary study on heuristics for mobile games. In: 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS); 2012, pp. 1030–1035.
17.
ShoukryL, SturmC, Galal-EdeenGH. Pre-MEGa: A Proposed Framework for the Design and Evaluation of Preschoolers' Mobile Educational Games. In: Innovations and Advances in Computing, Informatics, Systems Sciences, Networking and Engineering; 2015, pp. 385–390.
CsikszentmihalyiM. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row; 1990.
20.
MaloneT. What Makes Things Fun to Learn? A Study of Intrinsically Motivating Computer Games. Palo Alto: Xerox; 1980.
21.
MankoffJ, DeyAK, HsiehG, et al.Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 2003, pp. 169–176.
22.
KorhonenH. The explanatory power of playability heuristics. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology; Lisbon, Portugal, 2011, p. 40.
23.
LugmayrA. (Ed.). Media in the Ubiquitous Era: Ambient, Social and Gaming Media: Ambient, Social and Gaming Media. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2011.
24.
ZamanHB, RobinsonP, OlivierP, et al.Advances in Visual Informatics: Third International Visual Informatics Conference, IVIC 2013, Malaysia, November 2013; pp. 13–15.
25.
NackeLE, DrachenA, GöbelS. Methods for evaluating gameplay experience in a serious gaming context. Int J Comput Sci Sport, 2010; 9:1–12.
26.
ChaiCS, KohE, LimCP, TsaiCC. Deepening ICT integration through multilevel design of technological pedagogical content knowledge. J Comput Educ, 2014; 1:1–17.
27.
SaksvigBI, GittelsohnJ, HarrisSB, et al.A pilot school-based healthy eating and physical activity intervention improves diet, food knowledge, and self-efficacy for native Canadian children. J Nutr, 2005; 135:2392–2398.
28.
EdmundsonE, ParcelGS, FeldmanHA, et al.The effects of the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health upon psychosocial determinants of diet and physical activity behavior. Prev Med, 1996; 25:442–454.
29.
MacaulayAC, ParadisG, PotvinL, et al.The Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project: Intervention, evaluation, and baseline results of a diabetes primary prevention program with a native community in Canada. Prev Med, 1997; 26:779–790.
30.
LiebermanDA. Digital games for health behavior change: Research, design, and future directions. In: eHealth Applications: Promising Strategies for Behavior Change. NoarSM, HarringtonNG (eds.). New York: Routledge; 2012, pp. 110–127.
31.
PrzybylskiAK, RigbyC, RyanRM. A motivational model of video game engagement. Rev Gen Psychol, 2010; 14:154–166.
32.
HendrikxM, MeijerS, Van Der VeldenJ, IosupA. Procedural content generation for games: A survey. ACM Transact Multimedia Comput Commun Appl, 2013; 9:1.
33.
PedersenC, TogeliusJ, YannakakisGN. Modeling player experience for content creation. IEEE Transact Comput Intelligence AI Games, 2010; 2:54–67.
34.
ThompsonD. Designing serious video games for health behavior change: Current status and future directions. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2012; 6:807–811.
35.
RigbyS, RyanRM. Glued to Games: How Video Games Draw Us In and Hold Us Spellbound. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO; 2011.
36.
ChikA. Digital gaming and language learning: Autonomy and community. Lang Learn Technol, 2014; 18:85.
37.
de FreitasSI. Using games and simulations for supporting learning. Learn Media Technol, 2006; 31:4, 343–358.
38.
JeongE, KimD. Definitions, key characteristics, and generations of mobile games. In: Encyclopedia of Mobile Computing and Commerce. TaniarD (ed.). Idea Group Reference, 2007; pp. 185–189.
