Abstract
Background:
Acute altitude has a relevant impact on exercise physiology and performance. Therefore, the positive impact on the performance level is utilized as a training strategy in professional as well as recreational athletes. However, ventilatory thresholds (VTs) and lactate thresholds (LTs), as established performance measures, cannot be easily assessed at high altitudes. Therefore, a noninvasive, reliable, and cost-effective method is needed to facilitate and monitor training management at high altitudes. High Alt Med Biol. 25:94–99, 2024.
Methods:
In a cross-sectional setting, a total of 14 healthy recreational athletes performed a graded cycling exercise test at sea level (Munich, Germany: 512 m/949 mbar) and high altitude (Zugspitze: 2,650 m/715 mbar). Anaerobic thresholds (ATs) were assessed using a novel method based on beat-to-beat repolarization instability (dT) detected by Frank-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. The ECG-based ATs (ATdT°) were compared to routine LTs assessed according to Dickhuth and Mader.
Results:
After acute altitude exposure, a decrease in AT was detected using a novel ECG-based method (ATdT°: 159.80 ± 52.21 W vs. 134.66 ± 34.91 W). AtdT° levels correlated significantly with LTDickhuth and LTMader, at baseline (rDickhuth/AtdT° = 0.979; p < 0.001) (rMader/AtdT° = 0.943; p < 0.001), and at high altitude (rDickhuth/AtdT° = 0.969; p < 0.001) (rMader/AtdT° = 0.942; p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Assessment of ATdT is a reliable method to detect performance alterations at altitude. This novel method may facilitate the training management of athletes at high altitudes.
Background
Altitude impacts the human body and its physiology (Valli et al., 2011) via activation of peripheral chemoreceptors which lead to pulmonary vasoconstriction, systemic vasodilatation (Bärtsch and Gibbs, 2007), and reinforcement of the sympathetic nervous system while attenuating the parasympathetic share (Kanai et al., 2001; Yamamoto et al., 1996). This process leads to augmentation of blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output (Rosales et al., 2022) as well as an increase in ventilation (Bärtsch and Gibbs, 2007), which modifies the anaerobic threshold (AT).
Furthermore, the decrease in partial oxygen pressure results in hypoxia, which stimulates glycolysis and increases the availability for further oxidation of pyruvate and lactate (Bärtsch and Saltin, 2008; Heistad and Abboud, 1980). As a result, at moderate-to-high altitude, the training capacity is initially significantly reduced, especially without acclimatization. However, after about 3 days, 50% of the initial loss is recovered (Burtscher et al., 2006).
In sports medicine, AT is essential for the assessment of physical performance and the evaluation of training and its optimization. Although several valid methods for measuring AT are established, most of them are invasive, expensive, and rather complicated to assess (Sales et al., 2019). Therefore, Hamm et al. established a new, noninvasive electrocardiogram (ECG)-based method (ATdT—AT through repolarization instability [dT]) for the measurement of AT (Hamm et al., 2019; Schüttler et al., 2021a). ATdT° has already been validated in larger cohorts at low altitudes (Schüttler et al., 2021a), whereas the effect of high-altitude exposure on ATdT assessment is unknown.
Therefore, aim of this study is to evaluate the differences of ATdT° at low altitude (521 m) compared to acute high-altitude (2,650 m) exposure, and to compare the results with well-established lactate thresholds (LTs).
Methods
Research was approved by the Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät der LMU München.
Study population and setting
In a cross-sectional study setting, a total of 14 healthy recreational athletes (4 females, 10 males) with a mean age of 32 years (Range: 24–56 years) performed an exercise test at high altitude (Zugspitze at the Environmental Research Station Schneefernhaus, short Umweltforschungsstation Schneefernerhaus [UFS]): 2,650 m/715 mbar) and low altitude (Munich, Germany: 512 m/949 mbar). The mean body mass index was 23.21 ± 2.74
Assessment of ATdT°
To measure dT, a high-resolution (2,048 Hz) digital ECG with orthogonal Frank-lead configuration was used. The ECG recording was started at rest 15 minutes before the beginning of the exercise and lasted until 15 minutes after the completion of the test. Following adjustments were made to reduce ECG alterations: cleaning of the skin surface; ECG cables were taped to the patient's body and secured by a net bandage to reduce movement of the electrodes. ECG records were analyzed using the SMARTlab software. Briefly, the program uses the spatiotemporal information of each T-wave and translates the information into a single vector T0, which defines the main direction of the T-wave in space. The angle dT between two successive vectors in time is the degree of dT. At rest, dT is underlying typical low-frequency oscillations (<0.1 Hz) (Rizas et al., 2016; Rizas et al., 2014). For the correct capturing of the T-waves, preestablished algorithms were used (Laguna et al., 1994; Pan and Tompkins, 1985). For further information on the method, see Rizas et al. (2016) and Rizas et al. (2014).
During exercise, dT increases, falls, and at the end increases again. Inside this typical three-phased scheme, the AT (ATdT°) is defined by the moment of maximal discordance between the heart rate and dT, which is converted into power output (W), assuming a linear increase of exercise increments (Hamm et al., 2019).
Assessment of lactate levels and thresholds
Blood samples were taken from the participants' earlobe to measure lactate concentrations (mmol/l). Sampling was accomplished before the examination and at the end of each step of the exercise.
The LT was measured using routine methods, according to Mader and Dickhuth. Mader defined LT as fixed at 4 mmol/l, while Dickhuth defined it as 1.5 mmol/l above the lactate equivalent (Faude et al., 2009).
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics 29 (IBM Cooperation). Mean values and standard deviations are presented for descriptive analyses. For the comparison of ATdT-levels (low altitude vs high altitude), t-test was calculated according to the distribution of data (Kolmogorov—Smirnoff Test). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and Discussion
ATdT results
First, the mean ATdT° at baseline was 159.80 ± 52.21 W. At high altitudes, ATdT° decreased significantly (134.66 ± 34.91 W; p < 0.001) (Fig. 1), which translates into a reduction of 15.73%. Corresponding to that, the time to reach ATdT° decreased by 21.03% (baseline: 21.4 ± 7.6 minutes vs. high altitude 16.9 ± 4.8 minutes) (Table 1).

Box plot diagram of ATdT° at baseline vs ATdT° at height. ATdT°, anaerobic threshold trough dT; LT, lactate threshold.
Results of ATdT°, Lactate Threshold (LT)Dickhuth, LTMader, and Time Until Reaching ATdT° at Baseline and High Altitude
Differences (Δ) between baseline and high altitudes, and p-values. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
ATdT°, anaerobic threshold trough dT; LT, lactate threshold.
Rizas et al. demonstrated that the dT, which is dependent on ATdT°, reflects the activity of the sympathetic nervous system on the ventricular myocardium (Rizas et al., 2016; Rizas et al., 2014). At altitude, the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system adapts (Kanai et al., 2001; Yamamoto et al., 1996), and thereby might impact the ATdT°. However, our findings suggest that ATdT° deviates from the usual pattern observed in the sympathetic branch as it exhibits a decrease rather than an increase.
Further, exposure to high altitudes is known to increase heart rate and breathing rate, which may have the potential to distort our results (Schüttler et al., 2021b). Nevertheless, dT and therefore, ATdT° is independent of heart rate and breathing, which should resolve the issue (Rizas et al., 2016; Rizas et al., 2014).
Second, we analyzed the effect of altitude on LTDickhuth and LTMader to compare our ATdT° results with well-established methods. After acute exposure to high-altitude, LTMader decreased by 17.37% and LTDickhuth by 13.13% (Table 1). These results are in line with the observations of Weckbach et al., who described similar values in a study on the effect of acute high-altitude exposure on the LT, using the methods by Dickhuth and Mader to assess AT (Weckbach et al., 2019).
Figure 2 shows a significant correlation at high altitudes between LTDickhuth and ATdT° (r = 0.969; p < 0.001) and between LTMader and ATdT° (r = 0.942; p < 0.001). They also correlated at baseline: between LTDickhuth and ATdT° (r = 0.979; p < 0.001) and between LTMader and ATdT° (r = 0.943; p < 0.001). These findings are confirmed by recent studies that also show highly significant correlations of ATdT° with LTs (Hamm et al., 2019; Schüttler et al., 2021a). The validation study by Schüttler et al. described notable correlations between ATdT° and standard methods (LTMader, LTDickhuth) in 65 team sports athletes (Schüttler et al., 2021a). These LT methods are perhaps some of the most common ways to assess physical performance. However, direct measurement of AT using blood lactate levels presents several factors that could affect its accuracy, including the sampling location, sweat interference, and ambient temperature (Mann et al., 2013). In contrast, our ECG-based method is straightforward to use, repeatable, and noninvasive.

Pearson's correlation coefficient test for power at low altitude and high altitude between ATdT° and LTDickhuth and ATdT° and LTMader.
Although the exact mechanisms of ATdT° remain unclear, in conclusion, the presented results support ATdT° to be a reliable und valid measure of AT under different conditions.
Nevertheless, it is important to note that recent studies have falsified the original idea about the mechanisms of AT conceived by Wasserman et al. (Brooks, 2018). There is no evidence supporting the idea that increasing lactate is the result of muscle anoxia. Today, the lactate shuttle is considered the correct paradigm for describing lactate metabolism (Poole et al., 2021). However, the conception, that increasing lactate during physical activity is a sign of poor capacity to mediate metabolic burden, has gained acceptance over time. Therefore, the assessment of AT, such as through the use of ATdT°, remains crucial in the fields of medicine and sports (Poole et al., 2021).
Limitations
As the sample size is rather small and only includes four women, the generalizability of the results is restricted. Nevertheless, all shown findings are consistent with the current research on the topic. Our study is intended to lay a foundation for further, larger-scale research. Additionally, we investigated the effect only at one specific height. The effects of higher altitude might be different, and we cannot draw any conclusions about the variability of ATdT° at different heights. Therefore, further studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm our results and to strengthen the assessment of ATdT° as a new standard method.
Conclusion
Assessment of ATdT° is a reliable method to detect performance alterations at altitude. This novel method may facilitate the training management of athletes at high altitudes.
Footnotes
Consent for Publication
All authors gave consent for publication.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
This study was funded by institutional resources.
