Abstract

Esther Sternberg, MD, is a renowned expert on wellness and particularly wellness in the built environment. She pursued this track of interest in her career as she learned that the environments where we work, live, learn, and play have a direct effect on our health. In this column, she shares the beneficial components that must be considered when creating a built environment in order to optimize health.
I have been studying the effects of the workplace environment on people’s health for almost 25 years and can tell you with great certainty that creating wellbeing in any workspace is important and became even more important after the Covid pandemic. We know that chronic stress and the cumulative load of stress on a person predisposes them to more frequent and severe viral infections. We also know that stress can slow wound healing, speed chromosomal aging and the growth of certain cancers. Certainly, if a person is on the front lines of medical care, he or she is experiencing a lot of stress, attending to many patients, often losing patients to death, and experiencing many things that are out of one’s control. However, one can have control over the environment and create spaces that evoke calm and reduce stress. The silver lining of Covid was that people became aware of how important the built environment is for health and wellbeing. For example, most of the focus at the beginning of Covid was on the importance of ventilation in buildings and that frequent fresh air and turnover is essential for preventing viral spread.
In my recent book, Well at Work: Creating Wellbeing in any Workspace, 1 I talk about how, in order to have a wellbeing workspace, one needs to embed all seven domains of integrative health into the environment. The seven domains, as defined by the Andrew Weil Center for Integrative Medicine (AWCIM), are resilience, movement, sleep, relationships, nutrition, spirituality, and the environment. It is entirely possible to embed all seven of these domains of integrated health into the built environment. When initially designing or retrofitting a building or a space, one can ensure that by taking these domains into consideration that the health and wellbeing of the people working in those spaces will be enhanced.
At that time, Kevin Kampschroer, then Research Director at the GSA (now GSA’s Chief Sustainability Officer and Director, Office of Federal High-Performance Green Buildings), approached me and asked if I could help him measure the impacts on health of the office spaces that his agency builds and maintains—more than 370 million square feet of office space for more than a million workers. He wanted a prescription for a healthy building and a design for spaces that minimized stress and illness and maximized productivity.
I agreed to join forces in the series of studies that followed over the next two decades, in which my colleagues and I used wearable devices to measure the impact of up to 11 different environmental attributes on health, wellbeing, and performance. Some of those attributes included sound/noise, the layout of a space, humidity, temperature, carbon dioxide airflow, and others. In our research, we were able to document objective data, demonstrating that the environment where one works affects many aspects of health. We used health tracking devices to monitor people in the workplace and measured heart rate, heart rate variability (the stress and relaxation response), physical activity, posture, and sleep quality. We also sent questions to their smartphones asking how they were feeling throughout the day, such as whether they felt stressed, focused, and/or happy.
One of the interesting things that we discovered after measuring these health parameters—in five different Federal buildings over two decades—was that most people were not subjectively aware of the extent to which the physical work environment was affecting their health. For example, the participants were not aware of the impact on their stress, sleep quality, or movement, and yet all of these behavioral, physiological, and psychological aspects of health are deeply affected by the spaces where they worked. In total, our studies included more than 300 participants, and we also conducted studies with private corporations where we measured another 600 participants’ health parameters.
In the studies my colleagues and I carried out after I came to the University of Arizona, called “Wellbuilt for Wellbeing,” we engaged a large multidisciplinary research team including myself, a physician, psychologists, engineers, architects, building science and data science experts, and other collaborators. We found that the people who worked in “open office” design spaces were significantly more active during the day than people in cubicles and private offices; in fact, the increased activity amounted to the equivalent of about 1000 steps more per day. The term “open office” is actually a misnomer—it really should be called “active office design,” meaning no cubicles or private offices but many different types of spaces to work in.
We also found that the people who were more active during the day were significantly less physiologically stressed when they went home at night: their heart rate variability showed that they had 14% less stress compared with people working in private offices or cubicles. Those who were more active and less stressed also experienced better sleep quality, fell asleep more quickly, had a better mood the next morning, and were less fatigued the next day as well.
For example,
To get the benefits of daily exercise, you don’t need to be on a treadmill. Just 30 minutes a day of walking in a quiet, calm setting is important. Spaces that enable people to go offline for a moment to meditate or just be in a quiet space in nature are always a good idea. In the new AWCIM building, we have desert gardens and a Spirit building. We also have a labyrinth for walking meditation.
There have been wonderful adaptations of new technologies to create natural environments indoors. An amazing example of this is a story I tell in Well at Work, about a young woman, Mirelle Phillips, who was in the video game industry and experienced a serious accident. After her recovery, she decided to utilize her video game skills to help others. She set up a studio in New York City in 2019 to create immersive virtual reality nature experiences for people. Then the pandemic happened, and she realized that New York City was ground zero for burnout and even high suicide rates amongst health care providers. So, she quickly ramped up her efforts to create these immersive nature reality “Recharge Rooms” in hospitals, first at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. Now, she has over 70 different rooms in hospitals across the country with over a million users. Her research demonstrates that immersion in these virtual reality nature experiences for only 15 minutes a day significantly reduces anxiety, depression, burnout, and improves sleep quality. When you are in one of the rooms, you can call out “Take me to a quiet mountain lake,” and all of a sudden, a whole virtual reality wall becomes a quiet mountain lake. You can hear the waves lapping and the birds chirping, and you feel as if you are actually there. These types of nature experiences created indoors are very beneficial. It’s a form of guided imagery that takes one offline and away from stressful situations.
Bringing nature to the workplace environment by bringing living plants indoors is also very important, and it is doable. We are working with the College of Agriculture here at the University of Arizona, to have a vertical hydroponic garden at our new AWCIM buildings. One can also create roof decks with plantings. There are an increasing number of such rooftop gardens in cities around the world. In Healing Spaces, I describe an amazing Japanese roof deck garden in a hotel in downtown Los Angeles, California. It is incredible, and when you are there, you don’t realize you are in a big, noisy city with traffic and crowds many stories below.
There are many creative ways to bring nature to the place where one works if one doesn’t have the luxury of being able to be in it, or to have access to nature green spaces in the areas surrounding the office building. This may require working with city planners to create small “pocket parks,” or reclaiming parts of a parking lot, the way the University of Arizona College of Architecture, Planning & Landscape Architecture did to create a Sonoran Desert garden, which provides respite for all.
I also speak to groups of CEOs who are vitally interested in how to maintain a workforce that is happy, healthy, and productive. One of the big goals behind writing my current book is to spread the word to people who have the means, resources, and the power to implement these changes and create healthy wellbeing work spaces.
Another organization with which I work closely is the American Institute of Architects (AIA), Washington, DC. The AIA has implemented health and wellbeing as a primary goal across all of their knowledge communities, not only for health care design, but also for the design of any kind of built environment.
While these principles are not widespread in the manufacturing industry, there are some companies that are working to improve their working environments. One such company, Herman Miller, has many windows that bring in circadian light onto the factory floor. The people in charge make sure that their employees can go offline and rest or exercise—and provide the spaces to do so. The buildings are surrounded by meadows, where pollinator plants attract bees, and the company actually harvests the honey to give to visitors. So, there are some far-seeing manufacturing organizations that are doing this. But there is a significant need to enhance this momentum.
Covid helped shine a light on needing to design spaces that help people become resilient, because whether you become sick from a virus depends on the dose to which you’re exposed, the duration of exposure and one’s own resilience. If we can improve people’s resilience by including these wellbeing aspects of the built environment, it will go a long way toward reducing susceptibility to many illnesses.
To Contact Dr. Esther Sternberg
Esther Sternberg, MD
Professor of Psychology, Architecture, Planning & Landscape Architecture, University of Arizona, Tucson Website: https://esthersternberg.com/
