Abstract
Introduction
B
A higher prevalence of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli fecal carriage has been reported in the nosocomial setting than in the community. Studies have shown that ESBL-producing uropathogens have their reservoir in the digestive tract. 28 Previous studies have documented 2–5 years of ESBL digestive carriage.2,3 Finally, hospitalization of carriers increases the risk of infection for other hospitalized patients via crossinfection. Recent reports have implicated travel to the Indian subcontinent as a risk factor for asymptomatic fecal carriage of ESBLE with rates as high as 80% being reported from Netherlands. 29
The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of E. coli producing different types of ESBLs in the human fecal flora among antibiotic naive healthy volunteers in a tribal area.
Materials and Methods
The study was conducted during January 2005 to January 2007 via eight health camps and 22 visits to Jawadhi Hills, a tribal hamlet 3,000 feet above sea level, to collect fecal samples from adult (>18 years) healthy volunteers with no prior history of hospitalization, antibiotic use, and comorbid conditions for a year. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. The only means for access to healthcare in this population was in the form of weekly visits by hospital ambulance from the department of community medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore. The region has limited accessibility to urban areas due to the nonexistence of roads. People live in huts, along with their livestock, predominantly pigs, with no proper sanitation facilities. Water for consumption is obtained from wells or fresh water streams. Adults tend to migrate to the plains for work as agricultural laborers. The community is also known for its high incidence of neurocysticercosis due to pork consumption. The sample collection process was done from 115 healthy human volunteers with equal distribution of screening among both the male and female gender. One fecal sample/patient was collected after obtaining informed consent and processed within 24 hrs of sampling. A total of 0.5 g of each fecal sample was suspended in 5 ml of saline, and aliquots of 200 μl were seeded into two MacConkey agar plates one supplemented with 2 μg/ml of ceftazidime and the other without any antibiotics. A single colony representing each distinct colonial morphotype in the ceftazidime supplemented plate was regrown in the same selective plate and further analyzed. One isolate from each patient was selected for ESBL characterization. Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 (positive control) and E. coli ATCC 25922 (negative control) were used for quality control of ESBL tests. Initial antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the standard CLSI disk diffusion method. 18 ESBL production was screened by using both resistance phenotype and disk potentiation (Becton, Dickinson) and finally confirmed by Etest ESBL strips (AB Biodisk).
Polymerase chain reaction detection of ESBLs
Genomic DNA from these isolates was extracted after processing under standard conditions and used as the template for multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). ESBL amplification was performed by multiplex PCR with the appropriate primers for the blaTEM blaSHV and blaCTX-M ESBL types, as described previously.20,26 The PCR products were separated using 1.5% agarose gels and visualized under UV light after the gels were stained with ethidium bromide. DNA amplification by PCR yielded a fragment ∼550 bp for CTX-M, 918 bp for TEM, and 850 bp for SHV.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was done to evaluate the clonal lineage.
Bacterial DNA was prepared as described previously, 12 and XbaI (New England Bio labs) was used as the restriction enzyme. Digested DNA was separated in a GenePath system (Bio-Rad), and the conditions were as follows: 14°C, 6 V/cm, 10 to 40 sec, 27 h. The patterns obtained were interpreted according to the criteria established by Tenover et al. 30
Results
The rate of fecal carriage of ESBL-producing isolates of the E. coli in healthy volunteers was 19% (22 of 115 volunteers). The characterization of the ESBLs, the identities of the ESBL-producing isolates of the E. coli, are shown in Table 1. The distribution of ESBL-positive isolates by patient gender was similar among both males and females.
Indicates co-resistance to various other antimicrobials; C, ciprofloxacin; G, gentamicin; P/T, piperacillin-tazobactam; T/C, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid.
PFGE, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
The β-lactamase susceptibility profiles and the associated antimicrobial resistance of the ESBL-producing isolates are shown in Table 1. When CLSI breakpoints are considered, all isolates were susceptible to imipenem and meropenem. 18 Ceftazidime MIC showed that only 5 isolates were resistant (>16 μg/ml), 16 isolates were intermediate (8 μg/ml) while only 1 isolate was sensitive (≤4 μg/ml), whereas all of them were resistant to cefotaxime (>2 μg/ml). Tazobactam restored the piperacillin susceptibilities of 11 (50%) isolates, while clavulanic acid restored ticarcillin susceptibilities of only 2 (10%) isolates. Almost all (95.5%, 20/21) the CTX-M-producing isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin while 41% (9/22) isolates were resistant to gentamicin. Multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype was seen in 50% (11/22) of the isolates. The ESBL characterization (Table 1) revealed fecal carriage was mainly due to organisms producing CTX-M (95.5%) type enzyme cluster followed by TEM (63.6%). SHV was detected in two (9%) volunteers. All three enzymes were seen in two isolates that were also multidrug resistant. Both TEM and CTX-M were present in 63.6% (14/22) isolates, 36.4% (8/22) harbored only CTX-M, while only TEM was present in 4.5% (1/22) isolates. The ESBL-producing isolates obtained from healthy volunteers are described in Table 1. PFGE patterns of the E. coli isolates showed that a single clone was responsible for the colonization in 17 cases, denoting the presence of epidemic isolates within the population studied. PFGE patterns with difference of less than six fragments were interpreted as closely or possibly related to the outbreak isolate and were considered subtypes of A and are designated type A1, type A2 while the ones with ≥7 fragment difference were considered unrelated and were designated type B, C, and D. Nine isolates were type A (all TEM and CTX-M), six were type A1 (all CTX-M except for two isolates), four were type A2 (all CTX-M), and three belonged to types B, C, and D respectively. Interestingly, no evidence of any invasive infection in patients harboring ESBL-producing isolates was found in any of the colonized individuals.
Discussion
Asymptomatic colonization of the intestinal compartment with ESBL-producing isolates has been described previously.2,15,32 Most of those studies were performed at the time of nosocomial outbreak situations and showed the dispersion and transmission of specific clones in specific wards or even in the same institution.
Colonization with multiresistant isolates, including ESBL-producing isolates, is considered a prerequisite for infection. The importance of detection of carriers of antimicrobial resistant bacteria has recently been highlighted, not only in patient populations but also in healthy people.2,15,32 The reduction in the proportion of susceptible microbiota in the community reduces the possibility that the proportion of resistant bacteria in the nosocomial setting will decrease. Finally, the admission of carriers harboring resistant bacteria to hospitals increases the risk of infection for other hospitalized patients. Antibiotic selective pressure in hospitals may amplify the number of carriers harboring resistant bacteria and enhance the opportunity for these bacteria to cause infections.
In our study, 19% (22/115) of the healthy volunteers studied during 2005–2007 were colonized with E. coli isolates harboring ESBL enzymes. Of the 22 ESBL producing E. coli, 95.5% isolates had CTX-M ESBL type, demonstrating that the community compartment is essential for the maintenance of these enzymes. Moreover, the community can be a reservoir of ESBLs not yet detected in clinical isolates. The CTX-M enzymes usually have 4–16-fold more activity against cefotaxime than ceftazidime but some of them, such as CTX-M-15 and -19, also hydrolyze ceftazidime efficiently. 22 CTX-M15 was first described in India in 2001 and the Indian population is a significant reservoir of CTX-M-15. 11
Muzaheed et al. found a 20% prevalence of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolated from stool samples of patients with gastroenteritis. 17 All were positive for CTX-M-15 gene. Sarma and Ahmed did a study to determine colonization of ESBLE among patients in different wards of a teaching hospital. 27 The prevalence was highest in orthopedics (41%) followed by surgery (23%) and medicine (14%). Rodrigues et al. found ESBLE colonization in healthy executives to be 11%. 24 Vandana et al. reported a ESBLE fecal carriage rate of 2.6% among newly admitted patients. 33 A recent study on neonatal fecal carriage by Kothari et al. found 20.6% prevalence of ESBLE with CTX-M-15 being the predominant gene. 13 Two studies describing the spread of community-acquired bacteria producing CTX-M β-lactamases have recently appeared from the United Kingdom.16,36 In one, ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae were detected from the fecal flora of community and hospital-based patients from York. 16 The second study from the United Kingdom was undertaken by Woodford et al. who investigated 291 CTX-M-producing E. coli from 42 centers. 36 The community isolates (24% of the 291) were mainly from urines and produced CTX-M-15 associated with the mobile element ISEcp1 or CTX-M-9. It is noteworthy that most of the CTX-M-15-producing strains were multiresistant to fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim, tetracycline, and aminoglycosides. 14 In Barcelona, Spain a study carried out of stools revealed that the incidence of strains of E. coli-producing ESBLs, in hospitalized patients was 7.5% while healthy volunteers showed a prevalence of 3.7%. 32
Previously TEM-type ESBLs were found only in hospitalized patients, but our study showed a very high prevalence of 68% in our community isolates. On the contrary, the SHV enzyme, which was reported to be more prevalent in healthy volunteers, was seen only in 9% of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates. Kothari et al. found that of the 22 TEM gene amplified from ESBLE from neonatal stool samples only 9% were ESBL on sequencing. 13 Therefore, mere amplification of TEM and SHV genes does not necessarily mean that they are ESBL as they may encode the ubiquitous TEM-1, TEM-2, and SHV-1 enzymes. Sequencing them could have ascertained whether they were ESBL.
Fluoroquinolone resistance is becoming a common feature rather than an exception in ESBL-producing isolates. Previous studies have shown that all E. coli producing CTX-M-15 were resistant to ciprofloxacin. 13 Recent studies have demonstrated co-transfer of the qnr determinant on ESBL-producing plasmids conferring resistance to nalidixic acid with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones.14,35 A population-based study from Canada showed that ciprofloxacin resistance was independently associated with the presence of CTX-M β-lactamase and these strains commonly caused community onset urinary tract infections. 21 In our study, 95.5% (21/22) ESBLE isolates showed fluroquinolone resistance (Table 1). Previous fluoroquinolone use has been demonstrated to be a risk factor for the acquisition of ESBL-producing isolates, particularly isolates producing the CTX-M-type enzymes in the community setting. Plasmid-mediated Quinolone (qnr) resistance is on the rise; infact, qnrB plasmids reported from Indian isolates carried blaCTX-M-15 and SHV-12. 9 Therefore, the high degree of fluroquinolone resistance in our isolates coupled with CTX-M production and clonality suggest the possibility of ST131 clone in the population. 8 Thus, very broad antibiotic resistance extending to multiple antibiotic classes is now a frequent characteristic of ESBL-producing enterobacterial isolates. Fluroquinolone resistance in previous Indian studies on fecal carriage from Karnataka and Assam was 100%, while a study from Mumbai reported 45%.17,24,27
The emergence of CTX-M type enzyme as the predominant ESBL in fecal carriers is not an isolated phenomenon.25,32,36 In our study, a single epidemic clone was seen in 17 cases that may belong to the ST131 clone. It is a known fact that ESBL-producing strains can be transferred due to close contact, which, coupled with poor sanitation and common source exposure such as food and water, may have led to the spread of this clone in our study population. Similar findings have been reported by Pitout et al., who found two closely related restriction patterns among 67 (77%) CTX-M-14 producers that was responsible for a community-wide clonal outbreak of urinary tract infections during 2000 and 2001. 21 However, studies from Spain and the United Kingdom, also using PFGE, showed that most E. coli producing CTX-M enzymes from the community were not clonally related. However, the U.K. study did suggest some evidence of genetic relatedness among strains producing CTX-M-15. 36 E. coli producing CTX-M β-lactamases seem to be true community ESBL-producers and the current emergence and spread of these bacteria is both intriguing and worrying. Muzaheed et al. from India too found two pulsotypes among the nine ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae from 45 patients with gastroenteritis. 17 Prats et al. studied stool samples during an outbreak of acute gastroenteritis involving >100 patients and found CTX-M-9-producing E. coli in 11 patients with same clone present in 7 patients. They concluded that common source exposure such as food and water was linked to dissemination of ESBL-positive E. coli strains. 23 Tängdén et al. reported that foreign travel to areas with high prevalence of ESBL-producing strains is a risk factor for acquisition of ESBLE. 29 They concluded that participants visiting India were most likely to acquire ESBL-producing strains and all of them carried CTX-M-15. 29 Fecal carriage of 18.5% for metallobeta lactamase NDM-1 has been reported in a hospital setting from Pakistan. 5 With NDM-1 being reported from sewage and environment, it is only a matter of time before fecal carriage of NDM-1 becomes a reality in the community. 34 However, a recent study by Rodrigues and colleagues from Mumbai failed to demonstrate any NDM-1 carriage in healthy individuals. 6
In summary, a very high prevalence of fecal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli has been observed in antibiotic naive healthy human volunteers. This increase was associated with the predominance of ESBLs with CTX-M-type enzymes. The reason for the high prevalence of ESBL in our population must be a consequence of feco-oral transmission due to poor sanitation. The migrant population in our study must have introduced the ESBL in the ecosystem that spread to the antibiotic naive individuals. The two main limitations of our study were that we did not investigate the presence of ST131 clone among the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates and that TEM and SHV genes were not sequenced to confirm that they encode for ESBL-producing enzymes.
Footnotes
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
