Abstract
Endogenous and exogenous short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) require a 5′-phosphate for loading into Ago2 and cleavage of the target mRNA. We applied a synthetic 5′-phosphate to siRNA guide strands to evaluate if phosphorylation in vivo is rate limiting for maximal siRNA knockdown and duration. We report, for the first time, an in vivo evaluation of siRNAs with a synthetic 5′-phosphate compared to their unphosphorylated versions. siRNAs that contained a 5′-phosphate had the same activity in vivo compared with unphosphorylated siRNAs, indicating phosphorylation of an siRNA is not a rate limiting step in vivo.
Introduction
siRNAs are RNA duplexes of 19–21 nucleotides with 2 nucleotide 3′ overhangs (Elbashir et al., 2001a; Elbashir et al., 2001b; Harborth et al., 2001). Naturally occurring mammalian siRNAs and micro RNAs (miRNAs) have 5′-phosphate (5′-P) groups and 3′-hydroxyl (3′-OH) groups resulting from the cleavage of their longer precursors' phosphodiester bonds (Carthew and Sontheimer, 2009; Kawamata et al., 2011). However, in order for synthetic siRNAs to be effective upon entering the cell, the siRNA must become phosphorylated on the 5′ end by Clp1 kinase and be incorporated into the endogenous RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which consists of Argonaute 2 (Ago2), Dicer, and TRBP (Elbashir et al., 2001b; Doi et al., 2003; Rivas et al., 2005; Sen and Blau, 2006; Weitzer and Martinez, 2007). During this assembly, one of the two strands of the siRNA, known as the passenger strand, is cleaved, whereby the other strand, referred to as the guide strand, binds to Ago2 (Martinez et al., 2002; Matranga et al., 2005; Rand et al., 2005). The guide strand is bound to the MID domain of Ago2, which recognizes the 5′-P on the guide strand and anchors the 5′ end during loading (Nykanen et al., 2001; Ma et al., 2005; Frank et al., 2011). The guide strand in the RISC complex associates with the complementary messenger RNA (mRNA) strand, cleaves the mRNA, and regulates gene expression. The fate of the 5′-P after cleavage is unknown. While the 5′-P was continuously removed and replenished in Drosophila studies, when the same studies were done in mammalian systems, there appeared to be no phosphatase available and the 5′-P remained on the siRNA (Boutla et al., 2001; Nykanen et al., 2001; Schwarz et al., 2002; Weitzer and Martinez, 2007).
Previously, we demonstrated that 5′-phosphorylation was necessary for activity of siRNAs in vivo (Kenski et al., 2009). Using unlocked nucleic acid (UNA) modifications, we showed siRNAs modified with UNAs at position 1 or 2 were unable to be phosphorylated by Clp1 kinase and exhibited decreased binding toAgo2, reduced cleavage activity by Ago2 and less mRNA degradation in vitro and in vivo. Cell based mRNA degradation, Ago2 binding, and cleavage activity of the UNA modified siRNA at position 1 was successfully recovered by the chemical addition of a 5′-P on the UNA modified siRNA. The 5′-P was also able to recover the activity of the position 1 UNA modified siRNA in vivo. Since the UNA modification at position 1 did not impair Ago2 functioning when a 5′-P was present, we concluded that it was the lack of phosphorylation, not the modification, that prevented efficient activity of the siRNA.
Other studies using siRNAs containing different 2′-modifications at position 1 or modifications of the 5′-OH group have demonstrated the importance of the 5′-P group. Modifications such as 2′-altriol modifications or a 2′-F-4′-thioate at position 1 on siRNAs had attenuated potency that was recovered after synthetically applying a 5′-P (Fisher et al., 2007; Watts et al., 2007). When the 5′-OH was directly modified, siRNA activity was also abrogated. An amino group with a 3-carbon linker was used to replace the 5′-OH on an siRNA, which blocked phosphorylation by Clp1 and decreased activity (Chiu and Rana, 2003). Another study using 5′-O-methyl modified siRNAs also prevented 5′-phosphorylation from occurring and consequent guide strand loading into RISC for mRNA degradation (Chen et al., 2008). These studies emphasize the critical role of 5′-phosphorylation on the ability of a siRNA to function in the cell and that 5′-phosphorylation of an siRNA is necessary and may be a rate limiting step for RISC loading and cleavage.
Understanding the efficiency of phosphorylation of an siRNA and how that relates to maximal target mRNA degradation and duration of activity in vivo is critical for therapeutic optimization of an siRNA. In order to test if phosphorylation is the rate limiting step for maximal siRNA knockdown and duration we evaluated, in vivo, siRNAs that contain ribonucleotides at positions 1 and 2 of their guide strand and are therefore not hindered in their ability to be phosphorylated by Clp1. We then applied a synthetic phosphate to the 5′ ends of the siRNA guide strands and compared them against siRNAs with a 5′-OH that could be naturally phosphorylated by Clp1. We observed that siRNAs containing a synthetic 5′-P had the same mRNA degradation and duration in vivo compared to the unphosphorylated siRNA with a natural 5′-OH, demonstrating phosphorylation of an siRNA is not a rate limiting step for in vivo activity.
Materials and Methods
Oligo synthesis and sequences
Chemically modified siRNAs contained ribo (r), deoxy (d), fluoro (flu), or methoxy (ome) 2′ modifications as described previously (Zou et al., 2008). 5′-P was applied at the 5′ end of the guide strand when indicated using standard phosphoramidite chemistry. siRNAs were synthesized as described previously (WINCOTT, 2001). The siRNA sequences and modification are as follows:
Luciferase(80) [Luc(80)] unmodified siRNA Passenger: 5′-iB;rA;rU;rA;rA;rG;rG;rC;rU;rA;rU;rG;rA;rA;rG;rA;rG;rA;rU;rA;dT;dT;iB-3′ Guide: 5′-rU;rA;rU;rC;rU;rC;rU;rU;rC;rA;rU;rA;rG;rC;rC;rU;rU;rA;rU;dT;dT-3′ Luc(80) modified siRNA Passenger: 5′-iB;dA;fluU;dA;dA;dG;dG;fluC;fluU;dA;fluU;dG;dA;dA;dG;dA;dG;dA;fluU;dA;dT;dT;iB-3′ Guide: 5′-rU;rA;rU;fluC;fluU;fluC;fluU;fluU;fluC;omeA;fluU;omeA;omeG;fluC;fluC;fluU;fluU;omeA;fluU;omeU;omeU-3′ ApoB(9514) unmodified siRNA Passenger: 5′-iB;rC;rU;rU;rU;rA;rA;rC;rA;rA;rU;rU;rC;rC;rU;rG;rA;rA;rA;rU;omeU;omeU;iB-3′ Guide: 5′-rA;rU;rU;rU;rC;rA;rG;rG;rA;rA;rU;rU;rG;rU;rU;rA;rA;rA;rG;omeU;omeU-3′ ApoB(9514) modified siRNA Passenger: 5′-iB;omeC;omeU;omeU;omeU;fluA;fluA;omeC;fluA;fluA;omeU;omeU;omeC;omeC;omeU;fluG;fluA;fluA;fluA;omeU;omeUs;omeU;iB-3′ Guide: 5′-rAs;rUs;rUs;omeU;omeC;fluA;fluG;fluG;fluA;fluA;omeU;omeU;fluG;fluU;omeU;fluA;fluA;fluA;fluG;omeUs;omeU-3′ ApoB(10162) unmodified siRNA Passenger: 5′-iB;rC;rA;rA;rG;rU;rG;rU;rC;rA;rU;rC;rA;rC;rA;rC;rU;rG;rA;rA;omeU;omeU;iB-3′ Guide: 5′-rU;rU;rC;rA;rG;rU;rG;rU;rG;rA;rU;rG;rA;rC;rA;rC;rU;rU;rG;omeU;omeU-3′ PHD2(196) unmodified siRNA Passenger: 5′-iB;rC;rA;rU;rU;rG;rA;rA;rC;rC;rC;rA;rA;rA;rU;rU;rU;rG;rA;rU;omeU;omeU;iB-3′ Guide: 5′-rA;rU;rC;rA;rA;rA;rU;rU;rU;rG;rG;rG;rU;rU;rC;rA;rA;rU;rG;omeU;omeU-3′ PHD2(384) unmodified siRNA Passenger: 5′-iB;rC;rA;rG;rU;rC;rA;rG;rC;rA;rA;rA;rG;rA;rC;rG;rU;rC;rU;rA;omeU;omeU;iB-3′ Guide: 5′-rU;rA;rG;rA;rC;rG;rU;rC;rU;rU;rU;rG;rC;rU;rG;rA;rC;rU;rG;omeU;omeU-3′ SSB(869) unmodified siRNA Passenger: 5′-iB;rA;rA;rA;rU;rC;rA;rU;rG;rG;rU;rG;rA;rA;rA;rU;rA;rA;rA;rA;omeU;omeU;iB-3′ Guide: 5′-rU;rU;rU;rU;rA;rU;rU;rU;rC;rA;rC;rC;rA;rU;rG;rA;rU;rU;rU;omeU;omeU-3′
Transfection and quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Transfection and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for in vitro and in vivo studies were done as described previously (Kenski et al., 2009).
siRNA formulation
Lipid nanoparticles were made using the cationic lipid 2-{4-[(3b)-cholest-5-en-3-yloxy]-octyl}-N,N-dimethyl-3-[(9Z,12Z)-octadeca-9,12-dien-1-yloxy]propan-1-amine (Merck and Co., Inc.), cholesterol (Northern Lipids), and monomethoxypolyethyleneglycol-1,2-dimyristoylglycerol (NOF Corporation) at a 60:38:2 M ratio, respectively.
In vivo
C57BL/6 male mice 20–23g were purchased from Taconic Farms, Inc. Mice were injected intravenously with 200 μL of 3 mg/kg siRNA formulated in a lipid nanoparticle. Four mice per group were sacrificed at indicated time points following siRNA injection. Livers were harvested and processed to assess target mRNA levels by qPCR as described above.
Luciferase mouse model
The luciferase mouse model, imaging measurements, and analysis were done as described previously (Wei et al., 2010).
Results
5′-Phosphate does not alter siRNA potency
We first evaluated if siRNA in vitro potency was effected with and without a 5′-P. Six different double stranded 21-mer siRNA sequences were evaluated in vitro: ApoB(9514), ApoB(10162), PHD2(196), PHD2(384), SSB(869), and Luc(80). Positions 1–19 of both strands were ribonucleotides, and the overhangs at positions 20 and 21 contained 2′-O-methoxy nucleotides except for Luc(80), which contained 2′-deoxyribonucleotide thymidines (Fig. 1). The passenger strands contained inverted abasics at the 5′ and 3′ ends to block loading into Ago2 (CAMPOCHIARO, 2006).

Synthetic 5′-phosphate (5′-P) does not alter in vitro messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation of siRNAs. Six short interfering RNA (siRNA) sequences containing complementary all ribose guide and passenger strands and either a 5′-hydroxyl (5′-OH) (black bar) or a 5′-P (gray bar) at the 5′-termini were evaluated for maximal mRNA degradation. No change was seen for any of the sequences with or without 5′-P.
All siRNAs demonstrated target specific mRNA degradation in cell based assays as detected by qPCR. Hepa 1-6 cells were transfected with either an unmodified siRNA containing a natural 5′-OH that can be phosphorylated by Clp1 in cells (Schwarz et al., 2002) or a synthetic 5′-P on the guide strand. These siRNAs were tested for maximal mRNA degradation at 10 nM (Fig. 1A) and half maximal effective concentration (EC50) values (Table 1). For all sequences tested, unmodified siRNA with a 5′-P on the guide strand exhibited no change in maximal mRNA degradation or dose responses in vitro compared to the unphosphorylated version.
5′-OH, 5′-hydroyl; 5′-P, 5′-phosphate.
5′-Phosphate does not change activity in vivo
In order to assess the if synthetic 5′-terminal phosphorylation of an siRNA improves maximal mRNA degradation or duration in vivo, SSB(869) and Luc(80) siRNAs containing unmodified ribonucleotides with or without a 5′-P were formulated into lipid nanoparticles, which localize to the liver, and delivered by intravenous tail injection into mice. Livers were harvested for SSB(869) 24 hours after injection, and mRNA levels were assessed by qPCR (Fig. 2A). For SSB(869), unmodified siRNA with a natural 5′-OH had 75% mRNA degradation 24 hours after injection. The same SSB(869) siRNA that contained a synthetically 5′-P had 70% mRNA degradation, which was equivalent to the unphosphorylated version at 24 hours.

Synthetic 5′-P does not alter in vivo mRNA degradation of unmodified siRNAs. SSB(869)
For Luc(80), mice that constitutively expressed Luc from the Rosa promoter in their livers were used and imaged for luciferase activity every other day after siRNA injection (Wei et al., 2010). The unmodified siRNAs contained either a 5′-OH or a synthetic 5′-P. The 5′-OH siRNA had a similar mRNA degradation at day 1 as the 5′-P siRNA, with 78% and 70% mRNA degradation, respectively. The in vivo duration of the 5′-OH and 5′-P containing Luc(80) siRNAs were also not different from each other (Fig. 2B).
Since some siRNAs made only of ribonucleotides can be limited in their in vivo duration and potency and may have immunostimulatory properties, we designed heavily modified siRNA sequences containing 2′-methoxy (2′-OMe), 2′-deoxy (2′-H), and 2′-fluoro (2′-F) nucleotides. 2′-OMe modifications on the guide strand can reduce off target effects and, when on either the passenger or guide strand, reduce immune responses (Jackson et al., 2006; Robbins et al., 2007). 2′-F or 2′-H modifications can increase potency, serum stability and half-life while reducing immunostimulatory responses (Chiu and Rana, 2003; Layzer et al., 2004).
An ApoB(9514) siRNA was designed with a passenger strand containing 2′-OMe pyrimidines and 2′-F purines in positions 1–19 (Fig. 3A). The passenger strand overhangs were 2′-H with a phosphorothioate linkage and the 5′ and 3′ ends were capped with inverted abasics to prevent loading. Positions 1–3 on the guide strand were ribonucleotides with phosphorothioate linkages in order to maintain Clp1 recognition (Kenski et al., 2009). Positions 4–19 contained 2′-OMe pyrimidines and 2′-F purines. The guide strand overhangs were 2′-OMe with a phosphorothioate linkage for serum stability. In vivo, these modified siRNAs with or without a 5′-P did not significantly differ in maximal mRNA degradation at day 2, with 72% and 68%, respectively. The duration of activity was similar at day 14 for both siRNAs as well.

Synthetic 5′-P does not alter the in vivo mRNA degradation of modified siRNAs. ApoB(9514)
A different modification pattern was designed for Luc(80) in order to maintain maximal activity (Fig. 3B). The passenger strand contained 2′-F pyrimidines, 2′-H purines and overhangs, and the 5′ and 3′ ends were capped with inverted abasics. Positions 1–3 on the guide strand were ribonucleotides, as was designed for ApoB(9514). Positions 4–19 on the guide strand contained 2′-F pyrimidines and 2′-OMe purines. The guide strand overhangs were 2′-OMe. The maximal mRNA degradation in vivo for the Luc(80) siRNAs with or without a 5′-P was identical with 87% mRNA degradation observed for both siRNAs at day 3. The duration of activity was equivalent at day 14 for both siRNAs.
Discussion
This is the first in vivo evaluation of siRNAs with synthetic 5′-P. When 5′-P was synthetically applied to multiple siRNA sequences there was no difference in vivo of maximal mRNA degradation or duration of activity compared to the same unphosphorylated siRNA. These observations held true for unmodified and modified versions of siRNAs. This indicates while 5′P is needed for efficient Ago2 loading, it may not be the rate limiting step for achieving ideal in vivo results. Optimization of siRNAs for therapeutic uses will require further identification of the steps in the endogenous RISC machinery that lead to target degradation and development of modifications that will facilitate the most efficient use of siRNAs with this complex.
Phosphorylation of the 5′-termius of the guide strand is a crucial step for RNAi silencing to occur (Boutla et al., 2001; Schwarz et al., 2002). In the Ago2 crystal structure, the 5′-phosphorylated nucleotide at position 1 is located in the MID domain, with the 5′ end of the siRNA fitting into a basic pocket with the 5′ base stacking on the aromatic ring of a tyrosine which helps to further stabilize binding (Yuan et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2008). Ago2 interdomain interactions were shown to be critical in siRNA anchoring whereby a 5′-phosphorylated RNA fragment could not bind to the MID domain alone, but also required the PIWI domain of Ago2. In addition, the seed region of the siRNA, which is comprised of guide strand positions 2–8, has multiple interactions with the MID and PIWI domains of Ago2 in order to stabilize it in the correct conformation for hybridization to the target mRNA (Djuranovic et al., 2010). These studies suggest that the 5′-P, position 1 nucleotide and seed region of the siRNA all play a role in anchoring the siRNA to Ago2 for effective target mRNA degradation (Boland et al., 2011; Kawamata et al., 2011). The 5′-P on the siRNA may therefore serve as a reference point from which the cleavage site is measured. Further structural investigation of these regions of Ago2, and how siRNAs are conformationally controlled by them, will be useful for optimization of siRNAs.
The 5′-P is critical for siRNA strand selection, anchoring of the siRNA to Ago2, and as the start of a ruler for correct cleavage of the target mRNA. Yet, very few derivatives have been made to take advantage of the role of the 5′-P in an siRNA for maximal therapeutic activity. One area that has benefitted has been the in the development of single stranded siRNAs (ssRNA) that require a 5′-P to be active (Schwarz et al., 2002). In using ssRNA, the cost of goods and negative phosphodiester backbone charges are cut in half while delivery may be made easier. Recently, a modified ssRNA that included a 5′ vinyl phosphonate was evaluated and shown to improve the stability of the ssRNA molecule. Additional modification of the 5′-P will be necessary to improve the therapeutic value of ssRNA or duplex siRNA.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Pharmacology Group, especially Jie Wei, Jing Kang, and Elmer Payson for their in vivo work. We also thank Rick Sidler for his synthesis optimization of 5′-phosphorylation on siRNAs.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
