Abstract

P
I believe that all this is about to change this year. How then has this “volte-face” come about? There are several contributing reasons. There have been (and will continue to be) major advances made in understanding the underlying mechanisms of PBM at the molecular and cellular levels. We are finally moving away from the concept of “Voodoo Medicine”. The number of diseases and conditions that can be beneficially treated by PBM continues to grow, with no sign of slowing down. The wide availability of inexpensive LED devices with robust levels of optical power (up to hundreds of watts) that can be used at home has revolutionized the field. The rise of the internet has led to increasing interest and demand for nonpharmacologic, safe and effective treatments for a wide range of human diseases and conditions. Public disillusionment with large pharmaceutical companies (and the ever-increasing prices of their products) and the rise of “alternative and complementary medicine” has played a part. Compared with the vast majority of conventional medical treatments, the incidence of side effects with PBM is low to nonexistent. Nevertheless, the decision that was taken to adopt the new terminology “photobiomodulation” and “photobiomodulation therapy” to replace the plethora of terms and acronyms (over 20 in number) that were previously employed, has allowed everybody to be on the same page and to “sing from the same hymn sheet.” 4
Even though there have been well over 3000 articles published in the field of PBM, the number of high-quality articles published in top biomedical journals has been sadly disappointing. This lack may be partly explained by the reluctance of editors and reviewers to take PBM seriously. However, many authors themselves must shoulder some of the responsibility. All too often articles have been based on poorly thought-through hypotheses, have not adequately described the PBM parameters, 5 and have presented confusing results without sufficient explanation of the physiological mechanisms behind them.
We hope that all this is about to change. The upcoming renaming of the Journal Photomedicine and Laser Surgery to become
It is a great pleasure for me to take the helm of the Journal as Editor-in-Chief to propel the Journal in this new direction. I am delighted to say that Raymond Lanzafame, who has steered the course of the Journal for over two decades and greatly deserves our gratitude, has agreed to stay on as Executive Editor to smooth the transition and to ensure the highest quality peer review. Dr. Lanzafame has been a vital force in our field and I hope you will join me in thanking him for his important service both to the Journal and his contributions to the field of laser surgery and photomedicine in general.
I look forward to your article submissions and to your ongoing support as we move the Journal into this new era.
