Abstract
The generation of ex vivo functional megakaryocytes (MK) and platelets is an important issue in transfusion medicine as donor dependence implies in limitations, such as shortage of eligible volunteers. Indeed, platelet transfusion is still a procedure that saves the lives of patients with defective platelet production. Recent technological development has enabled the isolation and expansion of stem cells that can be used as a source for the production of functional platelets for transfusion. In this review, we discuss recent approaches of in vitro or ex vivo production of MK and platelets, suggesting that, in the near future, donor-independent sources may become a possibility. The feasibility of using these cells in the clinic may be safer, and in vitro manipulation could generate universally compatible products, solving problems related to platelet refractoriness. However, functionality and survival testing of these products in human beings are scarce; therefore, additional studies are needed to consolidate this purpose.
Introduction
Platelets are small anucleated and discoid cells with approximately 1–5 μm in diameter [1], which compose the human circulatory system. They have vital functions related mainly to hemostasis and thrombosis, being therefore responsible for containing bleeding and healing wounds by adhering to sites of vascular injury and forming a platelet plug [2]. These cells originate in vivo from the maturation of megakaryocytes (MK), in a process called thrombopoiesis, which in turn results from the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from the bone marrow (BM), in a process known as megakaryopoiesis. Normally, healthy individuals produce platelets continuously and have 150–400 × 109 platelets/L of blood, which remain in circulation for a maximum of ∼10 days [1,2].
The reduction in the number of circulating platelets to <100 × 103 platelets/μL, a condition known as thrombocytopenia, may occur as a consequence of hematological diseases and as a result of chemotherapy treatment, cardiovascular surgery [3], and traumas resulting in hemorrhages, among others. Thrombocytopenia is associated with high risks of bleeding [4] and increased mortality [5], and is an independent risk factor for multiple organ failure, death, and other complications [6]. Thus, to avoid these undesirable outcomes, platelet concentrate units obtained only by means of voluntary donations, and usually by apheresis from random single donors, are transfused [7 –10].
Limitations and Problems Related to Obtaining Platelets for Transfusions from Random Voluntary Donors
Frequent platelet transfusions are required by a variety of thrombocytopenic patients, with BM failure-related diseases [11], such as those with aplastic anemia [12], or with hematological malignancies [4,13]. Patients undergoing chemotherapy [14] and HSC transplants [15,16], as well as surgical procedures like cardiovascular surgery [17] also benefit from platelets transfusions.
The obtainment of platelet concentrates is totally dependent on voluntary donations, creating difficulties and limitations in transfusion practice. Notably, a constant concern is obtaining enough compatible and fresh platelets to cover the high demands for transfusions and to renew stocks, due to their low shelf-life of 5–7 days at room temperature (RT) and gentle agitation, which does not allow effective long-term storage.
Cryopreserved platelets are usually stored for up to 2 years before use and can become an alternative for very specific situations [18]. Nevertheless, even today, there are no effective methodologies for platelet cryopreservation that fully preserves platelet functions. Currently, cryopreservation, mostly using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), may damage a significant part of the platelets [19,20] and, in general, an average of about 28% may be lost during processing and cryopreservation [21]. In addition, reduction in the expression of glycoproteins GPIbα (a protein subunit involved in the formation of platelet plug) and GPIIb (receptor for fibrinogen and Von Willebrand factor) [22] and less aggregation capacity [23] were reported. After cryopreservation, platelets also show an increase in hemostatic effect in vivo in comparison to fresh cells, as well as a tendency to present a faster clearance of the circulation [24]. These characteristics, however, do not prevent the use of cryopreserved platelets in emergency situations, focused on bleeding control, such as in periods of unavailable fresh platelets for transfusion or in military operations [18]. However, thrombocytopenic patients would require fresh platelets with normal functions to obtain an effective treatment as fresh platelets have shown more efficiency in platelet increment after transfusion than cryopreserved platelets [25,26].
The transfusion of platelet concentrates may also present risk of bacterial and even viral infections, a problem that should be considered during these procedures. Platelet storage at RT, while helping to prevent the occurrence of early platelet activation, may contribute, in contrast, to increased probability of bacterial contamination [27]. Thus, the need to carry out tests to detect bacteria can reduce even further the time they are available for transfusion, since results may take up to 2 days to be released [27 –29].
Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness
In addition to these limitations, platelet refractoriness (PR) also represents a major challenge for health care professionals. In general, patients are considered refractory when they do not respond satisfactorily after receiving at least two equal transfusions [30]. More specifically, to define PR, it is necessary to quantify the post-transfusion platelet increment and this can be done from the calculation of corrected count increment and platelet percentage recovery, the most common methods. Both methods are based on the difference between platelet count, usually within one to 24 h after transfusion, and the platelet count before transfusion [31 –34].
In addition to rendering treatment based on platelet transfusion ineffective, PR can aggravate the patient's thrombocytopenic condition and thus their recovery. This increases the risk of bleeding, treatment duration, and costs [35–36].
In most cases, the occurrence of PR is multiple and linked to clinical and pharmacological causes, such as fever, infections, and antibiotic treatments [37], administration of amphotericin [38], disseminated intravascular coagulation, splenomegaly, and bleeding [30]. The incidence of PR due to nonimmunological factors alone has been reported in approximately 62%–67% of total refractory patients [33,37,39]. Moreover, problems linked to storage or platelet treatment, such as γ-irradiation [38], have been previously reported.
The remainder of refractory patients consists of refractoriness linked to immune factors or an association of these with nonimmune factors, constituting a proportion of ∼20% [40] to 37.5% [37], an important and significant number of patients. In addition, as this type of refractoriness is caused by a smaller number of known and more predictable factors, its resolution has a great potential to bring positive outcomes to these patients.
The most common causes of PR due to immunological events are more frequent in multitransfused patients [12], but can also occur after transplants and gestation [32] and involves prior exposure to Class I human leukocyte antigens (HLA Class I), which are the only ones presented by platelets [41]. PR can also occur due to exposure to the human platelet antigens (HPA) [1,33,42].
Frequent contact with blood elements from random donors, such as platelets, may induce the formation of alloantibodies against specific antigens in transfused patients, a process known as alloimmunization. The presence of these alloantibodies reactive to HLA Class I and HPA antigens in patient circulation is the fundamental cause of this type of PR [32]. To avoid the occurrence of PR, the most adopted strategy is the transfusion of platelets that do not have antigens reactive to the antibodies found in the patient's circulation, when they are available [40]. Despite the effectiveness of transfusion of HLA-A or HLA-B compatible platelets, which make up the HLA Class I system, and would help solve most of the PR issues, these are often unavailable [43].
In times of scarcity, the availability of compatible platelets for each patient can be compromised, especially for those who are alloimmunized, due to a greater variety of antibodies in their body and the greater difficulty and time spent to find compatible donors [42]. For this reason, the most affected patients are the multiple transfused ones [12].
Among these cases of refractoriness, those involving anti-HLA Class I alloantibodies are more frequent than the human platelet or anti-HPA antigens themselves, which occur very rarely [32,40,44]. A recent study has shown 108 patients with antibodies reactive for HLA Class I and 20 with anti-HPA [42], whereas another showed 110 patients for HLA and 2 patients for HPA [40]. Thus, HLA compatibility is essential as an effective treatment for refractory patients and should therefore be prioritized over HPA compatibility.
Taken together, these aspects make platelet transfusions an arduous and complex task, exposing the need to obtain platelets from more stable and safer sources, for this activity to be performed with greater specificity, and to avoid episodes of PR, lower risks of multiple immunization, and the transmission of infectious agents.
In Vitro Manufactured Platelets
The use of renewable cell sources as stem cells (SC), with customizable characteristics, capable of originating specific cellular products through cell differentiation, consists of a promising alternative for the production of functional, donor-independent platelets aimed at transfusions in the future. As SC are capable of both self-renewal, that is, remaining as an undifferentiated population and differentiating to become specialized, they may be used to constitute cell banks, which, different from the platelets themselves, can be stored for long periods of time, being submitted to differentiation protocols for platelet manufacture when necessary.
Platelets are produced through megakaryopoiesis followed by thrombopoiesis, two complex and carefully regulated biological processes. Megakaryopoiesis consists of the terminal maturation of MK, differentiated from HSC, displaying the CD41- and CD42-specific surface markers and for carrying out endomitosis, a chromosomal replication process, resulting in polyploidy. Thrombopoiesis represents the final stage of platelet production, with the formation of proplatelets in the sinusoid vessels of BM and the release of platelets into the bloodstream.
In general, the production of MK and platelets in vitro is an attempt to mimic the environment and conditions found in BM in a static manner, providing cells in differentiation with cytokines or cellular interaction stimuli, usually by the contact with specific formulation culture media and feeder cells.
Isolated and cloned during the early 1990s, the thrombopoietin (TPO) in complex with its receptor, c-MPL, is the main regulatory factor for in vitro and in vivo megakaryopoiesis, or the terminal maturation of MK from HSC and thrombopoiesis that comprises the formation of proplatelets and platelet release [45,46]. However, other cytokines such as human recombinant IL-3 [47], IL-6 [45], and stem cell factor (SCF) [48] act in the proliferation of MK, and IL-6 and IL-11 are related to MK maturation, including endomitosis [45,47,49,50].
Recently, new mechanisms of cell signaling under stress states are being elucidated, such as inflammatory conditions and acute loss of platelets, which hold potential for application in in vitro differentiation. They are based on molecules that display MK-biased platelet biogenesis actions.
The sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), for example, found abundantly in the circulation of mice and humans during inflammation, acts in the final stages of thrombopoiesis. S1P acts by guiding the platelets along BM's sinusoid blood vessels, until they reach the bloodstream, being subjected to the shear stress, resulting in the release of platelets [51]. The interaction of S1P with its receptor, S1pr1, present in MK, proved to be essential for normal thrombopoiesis in mice. However, the effects of S1P-S1pr1 signaling on human cells are not yet known, nor has the use of S1P been shown to stimulate the formation of proplatelets in human cell cultures. Nevertheless, it is likely that other proteins or cytokines not yet identified could perform this function in the human BM.
Recently, an aminoacyl transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetase, usually active in protein synthesis, apparently evolved acquiring a nontranslational function of regulating megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis. More specifically, the activated form of the tyrosil-tRNA synthetase (YRSACT) could enhance platelet production from murine BM cells in vitro and also accelerate platelet recovery of thrombocytopenic murine models. The YRSACT was able to induce HSC differentiation directly to specific MK progenitors (Sca1+ F4/80) capable of producing platelets and also by activating the TLR/MyD88 pathway in monocytic cells, which induces the production of cytokines IL-6 and Interleukin IL-1α, stimulating platelet production. On the other hand, YRSACT thrombopoietic activity is relevant for inducing the expansion and maturation of MK from human cells such as peripheral HSC CD34+ collected after donor stimulation with G-CSF and also pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)-derived human CD34+, through an indirect stimulation. Human cells only respond to this treatment when in contact with the supernatant from cultures of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with YRSACT. This suggests that YRSACT induces megakaryopoiesis by stimulating the production of cytokines by monocytic cells.
The increase in circulatory levels of cytokine IL-1α, also associated with acute platelet loss and inflammatory stimuli, induces rupture-dependent thrombopoiesis with rapid release of platelets into the circulation. Activated IL-1α originates from the cleavage mediated by thrombin of pro-interleukin IL-1 α present in macrophages and active platelets, ultimately activating caspase-3, which induces instability in the MK plasma membrane, reduction in tubulin expression, and inhibition in formation of proplatelets, resulting in platelet release [52,53]. The rupture-dependent release of platelets has not yet been confirmed to occur in human cells, either in vivo or in vitro, although active IL-1 α has been detected in humans during sepsis episodes. The confirmation of the occurrence of this mechanism in humans must still be carried out so that its potential in the production of platelets in vitro can be explored, with more precise control in the release of platelets from MK, or in the general increase in efficiency of in vitro thrombopoiesis.
More research is needed to be able to accurately assess the potential benefits of using these molecules for the production of human platelets in vitro, although the results in animal models are promising. Each of these mechanisms reveals the complexity of signals that control the different functions that can be performed by cells and molecules in vivo, indicating that more discoveries in this field can help differentiation systems in vitro to get closer to what occurs in vivo.
Recapitulation of the complex environment found in the BM is still a major challenge to be overcome to make the manufacture of blood cells from SC feasible. Not only the discovery of signaling molecules and mediators are part of this microenvironment but also parameters, including concentration of gases, temperature, and protein composition. Furthermore, the effects of blood circulation and shear stress have recently been proven to be essential for thrombopoiesis in vivo [54,55]. Recent results obtained from the differentiation in xenogeneic BM, using the cellular niche of a swine thigh bone, further suggest that essential factors exist in the BM environment [56].
Indeed, bioreactors and nonstatic systems demonstrated a greater capacity for scaling up, producing more platelets for each differentiated MK (Table 1). Although there is no consensus on the number of platelets released by mature MK in vivo, there are estimates indicating that no current method of differentiation compares to the natural efficiency of the human organism, whose estimated values are from 1,000 [9] to 4,000 or 5,000 platelets per MK [57,58].
Studies of In Vitro Platelet Production
HSC CD34+ obtained from PB, UCB, BM.
3D, three dimensional; ASC, human adipose tissue-derived stem cells; BM, bone marrow; DOX, doxycycline; ESC, embryonic stem cells; HSC, hematopoietic stem cells; iPS, induced pluripotent stem cells; MK, megakaryocytes; PB, peripheral blood; UCB, umbilical cord blood.
In a recent study, a pseudo-three-dimensional (3D) culture system could simulate the perivascular space of the BM to accommodate a greater number of MK for differentiation and performed the separation of MK and platelets using a double chamber system. It consists of two chambers separated by a nanofiber or a PVC membrane, and the pressure exerted by a syringe was responsible for the flow induction in the system. Initially, megakaryopoiesis was stimulated by cytokines TPO and SCF, with the induction of polyploidization using latrunculin or Rho-kinase inhibitor Y27632. The movement of the culture medium from one chamber to another allowed the retention of mature MK on the membrane in one of the chambers with the extension of proplatelets and the collection of platelets on the other side, due to the action of shear stress [59].
More efficient cell culture systems involve the inclusion of factors such as turbulence and shear stress, key events of thrombopoiesis that are considered fundamental for scale-up in production [60]. A greater number of platelets released per MK is associated with these factors [61], although overuse is also responsible for the inhibition of productivity [59], therefore constituting additional aspects that must be carefully regulated to make this complex manufacture more effective.
Further development of culture systems could help us to understand the details responsible for megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis, as well as reach, more efficiently, production levels that would allow clinical applications.
Hematopoietic stem cells
HSC are multipotent SC that are responsible for the continuous production of all the multiple mature cells that make up the blood. They can also proliferate, to maintain a population of undifferentiated daughter cells through the process of self-renewal [62]. As HSC have these two characteristics concomitantly, they are classified as SC. However, even among these cells, identified mainly by the CD34+ surface marker, some are not able to originate all blood cells since it is a heterogenous population with different capabilities [63]. Many of the CD34+ cells are actually hematopoietic progenitors, that is, they are cells derived from HSC, which have limited self-renewal capacities, and are already committed to differentiation into specific mature cell lines [64]. In fact, evidence shows that more stringent subpopulations like CD34+CD38− are associated with long-term HSC, and production of lymphoid and myeloid cells and recovery of hematopoiesis [65]. Nevertheless, even with a greater restricted selection such as CD34+ CD38− CD90+ Lin− cells, the population is heterogeneous and with different self-renewal and differentiation potentials [63]. Therefore, these cells are difficult to identify and isolate, and the only way to identify them as bona fide long-term HSC is still the in vivo test, with transfusion in properly prepared murine models and the reconstitution of their hematopoiesis.
Within the hematopoietic system, HSC are the only cells that have the capacity for both self-renewal and differentiation, and it is the only one that can reconstitute hematopoiesis for long term in organisms with extensive cellular damage due to exposure to radiation and chemical elements [63]. Therefore, HSC obtained from healthy BM through donation are the basis for the treatment of leukemias, lymphomas and cancers of patients who have lost the ability to produce healthy blood cells from hematopoiesis [66].
Since they have these remarkable differentiation capabilities, HSC are also considered to be potential starting points for the production of platelets in vitro and ex vivo for transfusion. They were the first type of SC used for the production of human platelets in vitro, demonstrating the entire differentiation process up to the production of functional platelets using human plasma and TPO [67].
Functional platelets could be obtained by differentiating HSC from: mobilized peripheral blood [68], umbilical cord blood (UCB) [69], and BM [70].
However, HSC are rare, making up about 0.01%–0.1% of the nucleated cells in the peripheral circulation [71], although HSC can be mobilized from the BM by increasing this amount considerably, [72] and 1%–3% in the BM [71,73] in healthy individuals. An unit of UCB can provide ∼1 × 106 HSC, but they have limited proliferation capacity in vitro and undergo changes of a phenotypic and functional nature when expanded in culture, since the complex regulation that occurs in vivo, in the hematopoietic niches, is not yet completely reproduced in vitro [74]. For this reason, dependency on recurrent donations of HSC CD34+ would yet be necessary, with subsequent selection of these cells to differentiate into platelets, which would be less practical and more expensive than a platelet collection by apheresis [75]. Even though it has been demonstrated that it is possible to obtain the minimum number of platelets necessary for a clinical application scale [59,69], that is around 1–5 × 1011 platelets [76], there will still be dependence on HSC donations.
Pluripotent stem cells
Embryonic stem cells (ESC) are pluripotent cells that constitute the internal mass of blastocysts, an embryonic stage of development through which embryos of mammals, including humans, pass, starting from the totipotent cells. Because they are pluripotent, they can form cells derived from the three embryonic tissues, endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm, having the potential to originate all the functional cells of an adult organism. This ability was demonstrated in vitro for the first time in 1998 by Thomson, as well as their proliferation capacity, while remaining in an undifferentiated state by means of self-renewal [77].
The iPS [78,79] have the same properties as ESC regarding pluripotency, but without presenting the ethical issues surrounding the destruction of blastocysts for its obtention. The iPS are the result of cell reprogramming experiments, that is, the reversion of the differentiated state of an adult cell to the pluripotent state of ESC. This can be achieved by inducing ectopic expression of specific transcription factors, notably Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-MYC among others, in target cells. Although the mechanisms are not completely elucidated, it is known that these factors are related to the maintenance of the pluripotent state and to the self-renewal of cells of the initial embryonic development, such as the ESC themselves. As they compose and feed an autoregulatory loop or circuit of pluripotency, different combinations of these factors may work together to maintain a stable expression of pluripotency genes [80] as well as similar properties as ESC [79].
The generation of MK from pluripotent stem cells (PSC) was performed primarily from ESC, with the induction of megakaryopoiesis from co-culture in OP9 feeder cells, fetal bovine serum, and TPO. Despite the low yield of <1 MK per input ESC, endomitosis was observed with 2N to 32N CD41+ cells, a typical marker of MK lineage [81]. Subsequent research was carried out, demonstrating the production of MK from differentiated ESC-generated hemangioblasts, with the production of functional platelets in large scale, in the absence of serum and stroma of animal origin. In this study, evidence of platelet functionality in vivo was also presented for the first time [82].
ESC and iPS can also form embryoid bodies (EB), using the method of Spin EB differentiation [83,84]. The forced cell aggregation forms a 3D structure, which is capable of differentiating and originating cells from the three embryonic tissues at random, but with the use of specific human recombinant cytokines such as BMP4, VEGF, and SCF can be directed to the production of hematopoietic progenitors. The subsequent addition of TPO, SCF, and IL-3 promotes megakaryopoiesis from EB cells, and thrombopoiesis occurs under the influence of the same cytokines, from these mature MK in collagen-based colony-forming assays [84]. The employment of a complex VerMES bioreactor, capable of simultaneously including turbulence and shear stress in the differentiation process, determined as important thrombopoiesis regulatory processes, allowed the obtaining of platelets on a clinical scale from iPS [60].
Alternatively, it is possible to produce HSC-like cells in vitro through the direct differentiation of iPS, to obtain blood cells, including platelets. iPS may originate the hegemonic endothelium, under specific culture conditions, such as through the forced expression of transcription factors [85,86], or by using a cytokine approach in defined culture medium [87] to obtain MK and functional platelets [88]. In vivo, the initial production of long-term HSC starts from the hemogenic endothelium, from which endothelial cells arise and by the endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition, hematopoietic progenitors are generated, colonizing niches that support definitive hematopoiesis [89].
The ESC, iPS, and derived cells, together with the promise of generating platelet independent of donors, may accumulate oncogenic mutations while in culture [90], present tumorigenic potential and genetic instability concerns, and hence, for their employment in the clinic. The possibility of the presence of undifferentiated cells among mature cells represents the main reason for this concern. Further research is needed to attest to the safety of platelets generated in vitro from ESC and iPS, including tests for platelet infusion irradiated in vivo, as well as whether contamination of nucleated cells would be eliminated with this process.
Immortalized MK
There is also the possibility of immortalizing MK, cells that can be cryopreserved and expanded in vitro, which would represent the possibility of producing platelets more quickly. MK progenitors (imMKCL) produced from ESC and iPS were obtained for the first time from the overexpression of c-MYC, BMI1, and BCL-XL genes. They act in conjunction with the regulated expression of c-MYC, inhibiting apoptosis and senescence pathways and promoting MK proliferation for up to 5 months. A vector controlled by the exogenous concentration of doxycycline is used to suppress this overexpression, which results in the induced final maturation of MK and thrombopoiesis, with the production of functional platelets by the imMKCL [91]. The imMKCL strain showed to be capable of responding to stimuli from other molecules, alternatives as agonists chemically synthesized to the TPO receptor, c-MPL. In a recent study, the compound TA-316 was shown to be the most effective, producing twice as many platelets in vitro in comparison to human recombinant TPO [92].
Based on the exogenous expression of the transcription factors GATA1, FLI1, and TAL1 in differentiating ESC and iPS, another group was able to obtain expandable MK cells. The proliferation period lasts for 120–132 days and a drop in cell viability was observed after 90 days. However, they obtained a high degree of MK purity (>90%) and a great expansion potential (2 × 105 per differentiated PSC approximately). The induction of thrombopoiesis for the production of platelets occurred with the co-culture of mature MK in murine C3H10T1/2 feeder cells in the presence of TPO, IL-6, IL-11, SCF, and heparin [93]. However, the genetic modifications necessary for the generation of immortalized MK strains cause some concerns, as reported by these authors, such as the possibility of chromosomal translocations after a few months of cultivation. This factor, together with the use of co-cultivation as well as serum of animal origin, may pose difficulties in their employment in clinical tests.
Human adipose tissue-derived stem cells
It has been recently shown that progenitor cells from subcutaneous adipose tissue are also capable of originating MK and functional platelets in vitro. The population of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASC) is multipotent and easily obtained in large quantities from the disposal of liposuction surgery [94] and can also be expanded into bioreactors to increase the scale of their production [95]. Furthermore, ASC do not depend on an external supply of TPO, which is necessary to perform megakaryopoiesis in vitro starting from the other cell types. ASC are therefore capable of producing endogenous TPO, by means of activation of the CD71 membrane receptors using transferrin, with positive ASC CD71 producing more endogenous TPO as well as MK cells than CD71-negative ASC [96].
HLA-Universal Platelets
Platelet production alone would represent a breakthrough and a great potential help for thrombocytopenic patients. However, alloimmunization and refractoriness-associated problems would still be present. Therefore, obtaining donor-independent HLA-universal platelets would be even more beneficial, since they could be used for treatment of a greater number of patients.
Transfusion of HLA-compatible platelets is an effective way to manage refractory patients [40], and for this reason, the use of HLA-universal platelets also has great potential for the treatment of these patients, without requiring a specific donor or platelet selection.
Although research evaluating generated β2-microglobulin (B2M)-knockout (KO) and HLA Class I-KO platelets in humans has not yet been described, there are examples of MK and platelets with these characteristics that have been evaluated in the circulation of humanized mouse models. In these models, B2M-KO MK and HLA Class I-KO platelets generated from iPS were able to survive [97] and avoid rejection by natural killer cells [98]. Furthermore, the fact that transfusions of HLA-universal platelets were also able to prevent the occurrence of refractoriness in animal models [99] strengthens the potential of using these cells in cell therapies in the future.
Class I HLA antigens (HLA-A, B, and C) are composed of two polypeptide chains, the largest, responsible for the serological detection of these antigens, for carrying the polymorphisms that distinguish them, and the smallest, corresponding to B2M [100]. B2M expression consists of one of the levels of regulation of the expression of HLA antigens on the cell surface, as even if the larger chain is produced, the smaller one is necessary for the exteriorization of the antigens. This has been observed in studies of Daudi cell lineage, originating from a patient with Burkitt's lymphoma, who have no HLA class I antigens on their cell membrane, but recovered this expression after being transfected with the murine B2M gene [101,102]. Thus, the relationship between the expression of HLA class I and B2M antigens became evident and has become the main target for the viability of HLA-universal platelets.
Some studies have shown a reduction in the expression of HLA class I proteins in platelets produced in vitro, by means of silencing the B2M protein in precursor cells. A reduction of up to 82% in the expression of these HLA molecules was obtained by silencing the B2M gene in iPS strains. The silencing of this gene was carried out by transducing the iPS with lentiviral vectors encoding interference RNA (RNAi), in this case, short double-stranded molecules in the form of a clamp or short hairpin RNA (shRNA) [103]. Functional platelets with a reduction of 85% in HLA expression were obtained from CD34+ HSC, using the same strategy [104]. The knockout of the B2M gene, obtained using the CRISPR/Cas9 technique, was capable of eliminating the expression of both B2M and HLA Class I molecules [98]. In these cases, until the end of the cell differentiation and maturation experiments, for the verification of their functionality, the expression of HLA remained reduced at the reported levels and silencing or knockout procedures of cells did not affect platelet differentiation or functionality at all.
With the possibility of generating precursor cells with permanent modifications in B2M, a renewable cell bank with cells capable of being differentiated into functional HLA-universal platelets would be closer to feasibility.
It is important to note that HLA-negative platelets would still have HPA antigens; however, the possibility of editing these antigens has been demonstrated recently. The allele PIA1 form of GPIIIa, the most frequently related to alloimmune bleeding disorders as the neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) and post-transfusion purpura (PTP), was converted in the PIA2 form. This conversion was performed in DAMI cells, a megakaryocytic strain, and in iPS from which megakaryocytic progenitors were obtained, correctly expressing the modified antigens [105]. The possibility of converting HPA would allow, in theory, the customization of manufactured platelets and would have applicability in diagnostics, research, and therapies. The production of HLA-universal platelets associated with HPA edition has not yet been made possible; nevertheless, it holds also great potential for application in the clinic and in research in the future.
Clinical Application Feasibility
Platelet production in vitro/ex vivo may constitute a permanent source of platelets for transfusion in the future, mainly helping to replenish stocks. Cell banks could be also maintained with HPA antigen variables, associated with HLA-null, for differentiation and obtaining very specific platelets. The mean number of platelets in a concentrate unit for transfusion has been reported as being between 5.5 × 1010 [106] and 9.69 × 1010 [107] each. However, the time to manufacture enough platelets to compose a transfusion unit is long and can reach 14 [59], 15 [55], or even 26 days [60] with current technology. This could be an impediment when a patient requires a large number of platelets at once or multiple transfusions in a short period of time, such as in emergency situations [108]. However, this would not represent an impediment in planned or predictable situations, such as in managing alloimmunized patients who require periodical transfusions of specific platelets.
Alternative ways to increase the efficiency of platelet production have yet to be developed and improved in order for manufactured platelets to be feasible for clinical use. This effort is observed, in addition to the development of more efficient cell culture systems, including more comprehensive reproductions of the BM environment, and in the discovery of compounds that act in thrombopoiesis. Recently, a drug testing platform based on the immortalized MK imMKCL lineage, modified for the expression of fluorescent reporter associated with β1-tubulin, was developed, allowing large-scale compound testing, culminating in the discovery of two compounds involved in the maturation of MK ex vivo [109].
In addition to the production capacity of platelets in vitro, other aspects must be considered to make these cells closer to their use in practice, including quality and especially regarding functionality. Fortunately, some important advances have been established in this matter, contributing to the possibility of using these platelets in clinical practice.
Platelets produced in vitro from ASC [96] and iPS [98] demonstrated the ability to agglutinate in vitro, in a similar way to natural platelets. The binding capacity of stimulated platelets with agonists such as thrombin and epinephrine, among others, to labeled fibrinogen [110] is also comparable with natural platelets. Other tests, including immunophenotyping for CD62P marker expression and PAC-1 binding, another marker antibody that only binds to activated platelets, have been used to demonstrate functionality similar to natural platelets [55,110]. In quantitative aggregation tests, different results were observed, where the capacity is comparable to [60] or slightly reduced, reaching a maximum of 80% of what is seen in natural platelets [111]. Although this capacity may vary slightly, in general, these studies show that different cells can originate platelets capable of activating and aggregating in a similar way to natural platelets. These tests also demonstrated that it is possible to control the timing of platelet activation, which did not aggregate spontaneously, a fundamental aspect for in vivo and clinical application.
The in vitro platelet production from ESC and iPS specifically involves the ectodomain shedding of the GPIbα glycoprotein, which is essential for the platelet adhesion to the injured vessel wall and also determinant to its in vivo circulation lifetime. The temperature-dependent activation of the disintegrin and metalloproteinase ADAM17, at 37°C, removes GPIbα from the surface, making the platelet dysfunctional. However, it was possible to discover an ADAM17 inhibitor, the KP-457, which allows the retention of GPIbα by platelets and does not present health risks, unlike other currently known inhibitors, also bringing these cells closer to be used in the clinic [112].
In vivo functionality tests also reveal promising results (Table 2), as bleeding interruption tests were performed on thrombocytopenic mice, with similar results from in vitro produced platelets and natural platelets on reduction of blood loss [111]. Furthermore, platelets generated from ESC and iPS were able to incorporate into the thrombi in formation, resulting from vascular injuries produced in mice [82,112].
Research Involving Assessment of Cultured Megakaryocyte or Platelet Functionality in Vivo
BM, bone marrow; ESC, embryonic stem cells; Human CD34+, HSC enriched from leukofilters; iPS, induced pluripotent stem cells; MK, megakaryocytes; MP, megakaryocyte progenitors; NOG, NOD/Shi-scid IL2rgamma(null); NSG, NOD scid gamma mouse; UCB, umbilical cord blood.
There is still no proof of principle for platelets generated in vitro/ex vivo and infused in humans as was done with red blood cells [113], where erythroblasts and erythrocytes generated ex vivo were demonstrated to be capable of surviving and of remaining functional after infusion in humans. However, some studies involving the infusion of MK in mice and humans have already been carried out with promising results [114]. The in vivo production of functional and viable platelets, for example, from MK infused in animal models suggests the possibility of using these cells, instead of the platelets generated ex vivo, to achieve the recovery of the number of platelets in patients [115,116]. MK obtained from the differentiation of UCB mononuclear cells were infused in human patients with hematological malignancies and undergoing chemotherapy treatment, with no major adverse effects. From a total of 24 patients, 19 showed platelet recovery of 60–100 × 109 cells/L, in variable periods ranging from one to 16 days. The remaining five patients did not demonstrate platelet recovery and required transfusion of platelet units, but the causes were not assessed [117].
In addition, it has been already shown that MK produced ex vivo, without HLA class I antigens, can scape antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro and also in mice [99], suggesting that transfusions of these cells in humans will not be impaired by the action of the nonspecific immune system [98,103].
Conclusion
In summary, the production of platelets in vitro or ex vivo is therefore an alternative still under development, but with great potential for donor-independent platelet supply. However, new studies must be developed, not only to make the process cheaper or to find alternatives to scale-up production but also to develop nonimmunogenic platelets, which prevent alloimmunization and refractoriness, focusing on in vivo functionality and safety, before clinical tests could be viable in humans.
Footnotes
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the article submitted to Stem Cells and Development.
Funding Information
This study was funded by grant number 2017/21801-2, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP); and grant number 168179/2017-2, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).
