Abstract
Babesia caballi and Theileria equi are the causative agents of equine piroplasmosis. In this epidemiological study, 294 horses reared in a rural area of northern Italy were studied. During January 2008–January 2009, blood samples were taken for serology (indirect fluorescent antibody test) and for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Data on the geographical area, sex, and age were collected for statistical analysis of risk factors associated with infection. A seroprevalence of 8.5% was found: 8.2% of the animals were positive for anti–T. equi antibodies and 0.3% for anti–B. caballi antibodies. No dual infections were observed. Of those horses with positive serology to T. equi, 33% were also positive in PCR, whereas none of the seropositive horses for B. caballi was positive in PCR. No significant correlation between sex or age was found for infection status.
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Geographic area and animals
In this study, 294 horses reared in an area of northern Italy, along the border between the regions of Emilia-Romagna and Tuscany, were studied from January 2008 to January 2009. The study area (44° 31′ 0N/9° 50′ 60E) is ∼488 m above sea level and is characterized by widespread woods and forests. Tested horses came from 96 breeding farms from 5 communities (Berceto, Borgo Val di Taro, Solignano, Terenzo, and Valmozzola). The age of tested horses ranged from 1 to 30 years. Whole blood samples were taken for serology by the indirect fluorescent antibody test and for PCR, according to Bashiruddin et al. (1999). Data on the horses' sex and age were collected for Chi-square analysis of risk factors associated with infection (significance p < 0.5).
Results and Discussion
Figure 1 summarizes the results of this preliminary study on the prevalence of equine piroplasmosis in a relatively limited area of northern Italy. Serological prevalence was 8.5% in the horses tested: 8.2% of the animals were positive for circulating antibodies against T. equi, whereas 0.3% were positive for anti–B. caballi antibodies. No dual infections were observed. Of those horses with positive serology to T. equi, 33% were also positive in PCR, whereas none of the seropositive horses for B. caballi was positive in PCR. No significant correlation between sex or age was found for infection status. None of the horses examined showed clinical signs of disease. However, positive PCR results indicate that at least T. equi is actively circulating in the area.

Results of serology and polymerase chain reaction in horses tested for equine piroplasmosis in a rural area of northern Italy.
Infection prevalence is markedly lower than that reported in Moretti et al. (2010) for the Emilia-Romagna region. This may be due to a difference in geographic features: Moretti et al. studied predominantly low-lying plains, whereas the present study was carried out in a mountainous climatic zone. It may also be due to differences in vector populations. Little is known concerning the presence of efficient tick reservoirs/vectors in this area. Rhipicephalus bursa and Rhipicephalus turanicus have both been reported (Iori et al. 2005), whereas preliminary results of dragging in the study area during the summer of 2010 have shown a predominance of Ixodes ricinus (data not shown). Iori et al. (2010) have recently reported I. ricinus as a possible vector for T. equi, with infection prevalence in this species of ∼5%. Further, the complex mechanisms of preimmunity and maternal transfer of antibodies may explain the lack of clinically manifest disease in horses in this area.
Footnotes
Acknowledgment
This study was funded by PRIN 2007.
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
