Issue Definition and the Opinion-Policy Link: Public Preferences and Health Care Spending in the US and UK

Abstract

This article explores the extent to which yearly changes in health spending reflect yearly changes in public preferences. Time series modelling suggests that health care spending is remarkably more responsive to yearly changes in public opinion in the US than in the UK. A content analysis of party manifestos suggests the significant role of ‘issue definition’ in accounting for this difference. Health care issues in the US have more often been viewed as problems of expenditure, while UK policy-makers have tended to focus on efficiency. Results suggest that the responsiveness of health care expenditures to public preferences in the US and UK is linked to the way in which health care issues are differently defined by policy-makers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumgartner

F. R.

Jones

B. D.

(1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). Berelson

(1952) Content Analysis in Communication Research (Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press).

Brooks

J. E.

(1987) ‘The opinion-policy nexus in France—do institutions and ideology make a difference?’, Journal of Politics, 49:2, 465–480.

Brooks

J. E.

(1990) ‘The opinion-policy nexus in Germany’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 54:4, 508–529.

Budge

Klingemann

H. D.

Volkens

Bara

Tanenbaum

(2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Cobb

Elder

(1972) Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of AgendaBuilding (Boston: Allyn and Bacon).

Dahl

R. A.

(1971) Polyarchy (New Haven: Yale University Press).

Erikson

R. S.

MacKuen

M. B.

Stimson

J. A.

(2002) The Macro Polity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Finkel

S. E.

Geer

J. G.

(1998) ‘A spot check: casting doubt on the demobilising effect of attack advertising’, American Journal of Political Science, 42:2, 573–595.

Freeman

G. F.

(1985) ‘National styles and policy sectors: explaining structured variation’, Journal of Public Policy, Issue No. 4, 5, 467–496.

10.

Ham

(1999) Health Policy in Britain: The Politics and Organisation of the National Health Service (4th edn) (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

11.

Hartley

Russett

(1992) ‘Public opinion and the common defense: who governs military spending in the United States?’, American Political Science Review, 86:4, 905–915.

12.

Hill

K. Q.

Hanna

Shafqat

(1997) ‘The liberal-conservative ideology of US senators: a new measure’, American Journal of Political Science, 41:4, 1395–1413.

13.

Holsti

(1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).

14.

Jacobs

L. R.

(1993) The Health of Nations: Public Opinion and the Making of British and American Health Policy (Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press).

15.

Jones

B. D.

(1994) Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

16.

Jordan

Richardson

(1982) ‘The British policy style or the logic of negotiation?’, in Richardson

(ed), Policy Styles in Western Europe (London: George Allen and Unwin), 80–110.

17.

King

(ed) (2001) British Public Opinion 1937–2000: The Gallup Surveys (London: Politico's).

18.

Kitschelt

H. P.

(1986a) ‘Political opportunity struggles and political protest: antinuclear movements in four democracies’, British Journal of Political Science 16:1, 57–85.

19.

Kitschelt

H. P.

(1986b) ‘Four theories of public policy making and fast breeder reactor development’, International Organisation 40:1, 65–104.

20.

Klien

(1995) The New Politics of the National Health Service (Essex: Longman).

21.

Klingemann

H. D.

Hofferbert

R. I.

Budge

(1994) Parties, Policies, and Democracy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press). Lasswell

(1965) Language of Politics (Cambridge: MIT Press).

22.

Laver

Garry

(2000) ‘Estimating policy positions from political texts’, American Journal of Political Science, 44:3, 619–634.

23.

Miller

W. E.

Pierce

Thomassen

Herrera

Homberg

Esaiasson

Wessels

(1999) Policy Representation in Western Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

24.

Monroe

A. D.

(1998) ‘Public opinion and public policy, 1980–1993’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 62:1, 6–28.

25.

Page

B. I.

(1994) ‘Democratic responsiveness? Untangling the links between public opinion and policy’, PS-Political Science & Politics, 27:1, 25–29.

26.

Page

B. I.

Shapiro

R. Y.

(1983) ‘Effects of public opinion on policy’, American Political Science Review, Issue No. 1, 77, 175–190.

27.

Petry

(1999) ‘The opinion-policy relationship in Canada’, Journal of Politics, 61:2, 540–550.

28.

Randall

(1995) ‘The irresponsible state? The politics of child day care provision in Britain’, British Journal of Political Science, 25:3, 327–348.

29.

Roberts

C. W.

(ed) (1997) Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum).

30.

Rochefort

D. A.

Cobb

R. W.

(1994) ‘Problem definition: an emerging perspective’, in Rochefort

D. A.

Cobb

R. W.

(eds), The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda (Lawrence: The University Press of Kansas), 1–31.

31.

Rushevsky

M. E.

Patel

(1998) Politics, Power and Policy Making: The Case of Health Reform in the 1990s (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe).

32.

Segal

J. A.

Spaeth

H. J.

(1996) ‘The influence of stare decisis on the votes of United States Supreme Court Justices’, American Journal of Political Science, 40:4, 971–1003.

33.

Seidman

Rappaport

(1986) Redefining Social Problems (New York: Plenum Press).

34.

Skocpol

(1994) ‘The rise and resounding demise of the Clinton plan’, Health Affairs, 14:1, 66–85.

35.

Soroka

S. N.

Wlezien

(2002) ‘Opinion-policy dynamics: public preferences and public expenditure in the United Kingdom’, Nuffield College Politics Working Paper 2002–W26.

36.

Spector

Kitsuse

J. I.

(1977) Constructing Social Problems (Menlo Park, CA: Cummings).

37.

Stimson

J. A.

MacKuen

M. B.

Erikson

R. S.

(1995) ‘Dynamic representation’, American Political Science Review, Issue No. 3, 89, 543–565.

38.

Webster

(1998) The National Health Service: A Political History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

39.

Weissert

C. S.

Weissert

W. G.

(1996) Governing Health: The Politics of Health Policy (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).

40.

Wlezien

(1995) ‘The public as thermostat: dynamics of preferences for spending’, American Journal of Political Science, Issue No. 4, 39, 981–1000.

41.

Wlezien

(1996) ‘Dynamics of representation: the case of US spending on defence’, British Journal of Political Science, Issue No. 1, 26, 81–103.