Participation,Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision-Making Processes

Abstract

In this article, it is shown that citizen process preferences are complex and include several dimensions. The argument relies on data from a representative sample of Spanish citizens (N = 2,450) to assess these dimensions. Using confirmatory factor analysis as well as Mokken analysis, it is shown that citizen process preferences capture support for three different models: participatory, representative and expert-based. The relationships between these dimensions (where the opposition between representation and participation stands as the clearest result) and the substantive and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

democracy participation expert governance stealth democracy process preferences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

and Goodyear-Grant

(2010) ‘Why are Highly Informed Citizens Sceptical of Referenda?’, Electoral Studies, 29 (2), 227–38.

Bagozzi

R. P.

and Yi

(1988) ‘On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74–94.

Bengtsson

(2012) ‘Citizens Perceptions of Political Processes: A Critical Evaluation of Preference Consistency and Survey Items’, Revista Internacional De Sociología, 70 (5), 45–64.

Bengtsson

Å.

and Christensen

(2014) ‘Ideals and Action: Do Citizens' Patterns of Political Participation Correspond to Their Conceptions of Democracy?’, Government and Opposition. doi: 10.1017/gov.2014.29.

Bengtsson

and Mattila

(2009) ‘Direct Democracy and Its Critics: Support for Direct Democracy and “Stealth” Democracy in Finland’, West European Politics, 32 (5), 1031–48.

Bentler

(1990) ‘Comparative Fix Indexes in Structural Models’, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–46.

Bowler

Donovan

and Karp

(2007) ‘Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies’, Political Research Quarterly, 60, 351–62.

Brooks

Stasiak

and Zyro

(eds) (2012) Policy Expertise in Contemporary Democracies. Farnham: Ashgate.

Budge

(1996) The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. London: Polity Press.

10.

Coffé

and Michels

(2014) ‘Education and Support for Representative, Direct and Stealth Democracy’, Electoral Studies, 35, 1–11.

11.

Dalton

Bürklin

and Drummond

(2001) ‘Public Opinion and Direct Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 12 (4), 141–53.

12.

Díaz de Rada

and Nuñez

(2008) Estudio de las Incidencias en la Investigación por Encuesta. Madrid: CIS.

13.

Donovan

and Karp

J. A.

(2006) ‘Popular Support for Direct Democracy’, Party Politics, 12 (5), 671–88.

14.

Evans

Stoker

and Nasir

(2013) How Do Australians Imagine Their Democracy? Canberra: ANZSOG Institute for Governance.

15.

Fischer

(1993) ‘Citizen Participation and the Democratization of Policy Expertise: From Theoretical Inquiry to Practical Cases’, Policy Sciences, 26 (1), 163–87.

16.

Font

and Fernández

J. L.

(2014) ‘Who Supports Expert Governance?’. Paper presented at the Jornades de Comportament Polític, ICPS, Barcelona.

17.

Font

Navarro

Wojcieszak

and Alarcón

(2012) ‘¿Democracia sigilosa en España? Preferencias de la ciudadanía española sobre las formas decisión política y sus factores explicativos. Opiniones y Actitudes, 71, Madrid: CIS.

18.

Gangl

(2007) ‘Examining Citizens' Beliefs that Government Should Run Like Business’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 71 (4), 661–70.

19.

Ganuza

García Espin

and De Marco

(2013) ‘The Political Turn of Citizens: What Does Disaffection Mean in Spain?’. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Mainz.

20.

Gastil

(2000) By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

21.

Hibbing

and Theiss-Morse

(2002) Stealth Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

22.

L. T.

and Bentler

(1999) ‘Cut of Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives’, Structural Equations Modeling, 6 (1), 1–55.

23.

Hughes

(2011) ‘“Young People Took to the Streets and All of a Sudden All of the Political Parties Got Old”: The 15M Movement in Spain’, Social Movement Studies, 10, 407–13.

24.

Jacobs

L. R.

Lomax Cook

and Delli Carpini

(2009) Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25.

John

Smith

and Stoker

(2009) ‘Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour’, Political Quarterly, 80, 361–70.

26.

Jöreskog

(1993) ‘Testing Structural Equations Models’, in Bollen

and Long

S. J.

(eds), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 294–316.

27.

McDonnell

and Valbruzzi

(2014) ‘Defining and Classifying Technocrat-Led and Technocratic Governments’, European Journal of Political Research, 53 (4), 654–71.

28.

Mokken

R. J.

(1970) A Theory and Method of Scale Analysis. The Hague: Mouton.

29.

Morales

(2009) Joining Political Organisations. Colchester: ECPR Press.

30.

Muñoz

Rico

and Anduiza

(2012) ‘Austerity Policies and Political Involvement: Evidence from a Panel Survey in Spain (2010–11)’. Paper presented at the Workshop ‘Change in Political Attitudes: Panels and Experiments', UAB.

31.

Navarro

(2012) ‘Procesos y Confianza Política: ¿Quiénes Deben Ser Virtuosos?’, in Font

Navarro

Wojcieszak

and Alarcón

(eds), ‘¿Democracia sigilosa en España? Preferencias de la ciudadanía española sobre las formas decisión política y sus factores explicativos. Opiniones y Actitudes, 71, Madrid: CIS, pp. 83–98.

32.

Neblo

(2010) ‘Who Wants to Deliberate – And Why?’, American Political Science Review, 104 (3), 566–83.

33.

Satorra

and Bentley

(1990) ‘Model Conditions for Asymptotic Robustness in the Analysis of Linear Relations’, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 10, 235–49.

34.

Schumpeter

(1943) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.

35.

Schwartz

(1999) ‘Self-Reports: How the Questions Shape the Answers’, American Psychologist, 54, 93–104.

36.

Smith

(2009) Democratic Innovations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Van Deth

Montero

J. R.

and Westholm

(eds) (2007) Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. London: Routledge.

38.

Webb

(2013) ‘Who is Willing to Participate? Dissatisfied Democrats, Stealth Democrats and Populists in the United Kingdom’, European Journal of Political Research, 52, 747–72.

39.

Webb

Bale

and Taggart

(2010) ‘Deliberative versus Parliamentary Democracy in the UK: An Experimental Study’, SEI Working Paper 118.

40.

Wojcieszak

(2014) ‘Preferences for Political Decision-Making Processes and Issue Publics’, Public Opinion Quarterly. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfuo39. [Accessed 9 January 2015].

41.

Zaller

(1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.