Despite its ever-present and at times escalating significance, conspiracy theory is an under-researched topic in the social sciences. This paper analyses the political influence of conspiracy theories by drawing on semi-structured interviews with the representatives of four major political parties from the Turkish parliament about widespread anti-Semitic conspiracy theories regarding Dönmes (converts). The findings indicate that right-wing political parties problematize the secret character of the Dönme community and use the conspiracy theories to express their own ontological insecurities emerging from the Sèvres syndrome. Left-wing and liberal parties conversely dissociate themselves from the conspiratorial rhetoric. The research concludes that the political parties reject or accept the conspiracy theories rationally and in alignment with their own ontological insecurities; by doing so, they pragmatically confirm their individual ideological perspective.
ArasB., (2009), ‘Turkey's rise in the Greater Middle East: peace-building in the periphery’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 11 (1): 29–41.
4.
ArikanB., (2002), ‘Turkish ultra-nationalists under review: a study of the Nationalist Action Party’, Nations and Nationalism, 8 (1): 357–375.
5.
AydinliE., (2002), ‘Between security and liberalization: decoding Turkey's struggle with the PKK’, Security Dialogue, 33 (2): 209–225.
6.
BaerM., (2010), The Dönme: Jewish Converts, Muslim Revolutionaries, and Secular Turks, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
7.
BaliR., (2002), ‘Bir Dönmenin hikayesi: Nazif Ozge kimdir?’, Tarih ve Toplum, 38 (223): 15–22.
8.
BaliR., (2008), A Scapegoat for All Seasons: The Dönmes or Crypto-Jews of Turkey, ISIS.
9.
BaumanZ., (1991), Modernity and Ambivalence, Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
Ben-IttoH., (2005), The Lie that Wouldn't Die: The Protocols of Elders of Zion, London: Vallentine Mitchell.
11.
BerenskoetterF. and GiegerichB., (2010), ‘From NATO to ESDP: A social constructivist analysis of German strategic adjustment after the end of the Cold War’, Security Studies, 19 (3): 407–452.
12.
BessemerP., (2003), ‘Who is a crypto-Jew? A historical survey of the Sabbatean debate in Turkey’, Kabbalah, Journal for the Study of Jewish Mystical Texts, 9: 121–122.
13.
BirchallC., (2006), Knowledge Goes Pop: From Conspiracy Theory to Gossip, Oxford: Berg.
14.
BratichJ., (2008), Conspiracy Panics: Political Rationality and Popular Culture, Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
BronnerS., (2003), A Rumor about the Jews: Anti-Semitism, Conspiracy, and the Protocols of Zion, New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
ÇinarM., (2006), ‘Turkey's transformation under the AKP rule’, The Muslim World, 96 (3): 469–486.
17.
CohnN., (1970), Warrant for Genocide: The Myth of the Jewish World Conspiracy and the Protocols of Elders of Zion, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
18.
DrorianS., (2005), ‘Turkey: security, state and society in troubled times’, European Security, 14 (2): 255–275.
19.
DupuisA. and ThornsD., (1998), ‘Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security’, The Sociological Review, 46 (1): 24–47.
20.
FensterM., (1999), Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
GiddensA., (1992), The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
GöçekM., (2011), The Transformation of Turkey: Redefining State and Society from the Ottoman Empire to the Modern Era, London: I. B. Tauris.
23.
GrayM., (2010), Conspiracy Theories in the Arab World, London: Routledge.
24.
GuidaM., (2008), “‘The Sèvres syndrome” and “Komplo“ theories in the Islamist and secular Press’, Turkish Studies, 9 (1): 37–52.
25.
HanioǧluŞ., (1994), ‘Jews in the Young Turk movement to the 1908 revolution’, in AvigdorL. (ed.), The Jews of the Ottoman Empire, 519–526, Princeton: Darwin Press.
26.
HintjensH., (2001), ‘When identity becomes a knife: reflecting on the genocide in Rwanda’, Ethnicities, 1 (1): 25–55.
27.
HofstadterR., (1965), The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
28.
HuysmansJ., (1998), ‘Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier’, European Journal of International Relations, 4 (2): 226–255.
29.
İnceB., (2012), ‘Citizenship education in Turkey: inclusive or exclusive’, Oxford Review of Education, 38 (2): 115–131.
JungD. and PiccoliW., (2000), ‘The Turkish-Israeli Alignment: paranoia or pragmatism?’, Security Dialogue, 31 (1): 91–104.
32.
KinnvallC., (2004), ‘Globalization and religious nationalism: self, identity, and the search for ontological security’, Political Psychology, 25 (5): 741–767.
33.
KinnvallC., (2006), Globalization and Religious Nationalism in India: The Search for Ontological Security, London: Routledge.
34.
KnightP., (2000), Conspiracy Culture: From the Kennedy Assassination to the X-Files, London: Routledge.
35.
LockeS., (2009), ‘Conspiracy culture, blame culture, and rationalisation’, The Sociological Review, 57 (4): 567–585.
36.
MelleyT., (2000), Empire of Conspiracy: The Culture of Paranoia in Postwar America, London: Cornell University Press.
37.
MitzenJ., (2006), ‘Ontological security in world politics: state identity and the security dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations, 12 (3): 341–370.
38.
MuftiM., (1998), ‘Daring and caution in Turkish foreign policy’, The Middle East Journal, 52 (1): 32–50.
39.
NefesT., (2011), ‘Conspiracy theories as conduits of fundamentalist knowledge’, in MartenssonU.BaileyU.RingroseP. and DyrendalA. (eds), Fundamentalism in the Modern World: Volume One: Fundamentalism, Politics and History: The State Globalization and Political Ideologies, 219–239, London: I. B. Tauris.
40.
NefesT., (2012), ‘The history of the social constructions about Dönmes (converts)’, The Journal of Historical Sociology, 25 (3): 413–439.
41.
NefesT., (2013), ‘The function of secrecy in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories: the case of Dönmes in Turkey’, in ReinkowskiM. and ButterM. (eds), Conspiracy Theories, New York: De Gruyter.
42.
NeyziL., (2002), ‘Remembering to forget: Sabbateanism, national identity and subjectivity in Turkey’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 44 (1): 137–158.
43.
OlmstedK., (2009), Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11, New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
PipesD., (1997), Conspiracy: How the Paranoid Style Flourishes and Where it Comes From, New York: Free Press.
45.
PopperK., (1966), The Open Society and its Enemies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
RobinsP., (2003), Suits and Uniforms: Turkish Foreign Policy since the Cold War, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003.
47.
RobinsR. and PostM., (1997), Political Paranoia: The Psycho-politics of Hatred, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48.
RohrI., (2003), ‘The use of antisemitism in the Spanish Civil War’, Patterns of Prejudice, 37 (2): 195–211.
49.
RumfordC., (2001), ‘Human rights and democratization in Turkey in the context of EU candidature’, Journal of European Area Studies, 9 (1): 93–105.
50.
RumfordC., (2002), ‘Placing democratization within the global frame: sociological approaches to universalism and democratic contestation in contemporary Turkey’, The Sociological Review, 50 (2): 258–277.
51.
ScholemG., (1971), The Messianic Idea in Judaism: And Other Essays on Jewish Spirituality, New York: Schocken Books.
52.
SimmelG., (1906), ‘The sociology of secrecy and secret societies’, American Journal of Sociology, 11 (4): 441–498.
53.
ŞişmanC., (2008), Sabatay Sevi ve Sabataycilar: Mitler ve Gerçekler, İstanbul: Aşina Kitaplar.
54.
ŞişmanC., (2010), ‘Cortijo de Sevi: Kültür mirasi Sabetay Sevi'nin evi'nin geçmişi, bugünü, geleceǧi’, Toplumsal Tarih, 196: 14–25.
55.
SkeyM., (2010), ‘A sense of where you belong in the world: national belonging, ontological security and the status of the ethnic majority in England’, Nations and Nationalism, 16 (4): 715–733.
56.
StaniševskiD., (2011), ‘Fear thy neighbour ontological security and the illusion of national purity’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 33 (1): 62–79.
57.
SteeleB., (2005), ‘Ontological security and the power of self-identity: British neutrality and the American Civil War’, Review of International Studies, 31: 519–540.
58.
TurunçH., (2007), ‘Islamist or democratic? The AKP's search for identity in Turkish politics’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 15 (1): 79–91.
59.
WattsN., (1999), ‘Allies and enemies: Pro-Kurdish parties in Turkish politics, 1990–94’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 31 (4): 631–656.
60.
WebbE., (2011), ‘Resisting anamnesis: A Nietzschean analysis of Turkey's National History Education’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 19 (4): 489–500.
61.
YalçinS., (2004), Efendi: Beyaz Türklerin Büyük Sirri, Istanbul: Doǧan Kitap.
62.
YalçinS., (2006), Efendi 2: Beyaz Müslümanlarin Büyük Sirri, Istanbul: Doǧan Kitap.
YilmazH., (2006), ‘Two pillars of nationalist Euroskepticism in Turkey: the Tanzimat and Sèvres syndromes’, in KarlssonI. and StromA. (eds), Turkey, Sweden and the European Union: Experiences and Expectations, 29–40, Stockholm: SIEPS.
65.
YilmazH., (2011), ‘Euroscepticism in Turkey: parties, elites and public opinion’, South European Society and Politics, 16 (1): 185–208.
66.
ZarakolA., (2010), ‘Ontological (in)security and state denial of historical crimes: Turkey and Japan’, International Relations, 24 (1): 3–23.
67.
ZorluI., (1998), Evet Ben Selanik'liyim: Türkiye Sabetayciliǧi, Istanbul: Belge Yayınları.
