The last decade has seen a notable increase in support for far right parties and an alarming rise of right-wing extremism across Europe. Drawing on a new comparative youth survey in 14 European countries, this article provides deeper insight into young people's support for nationalist and far right ideology: negative attitudes towards minorities, xenophobia, welfare chauvinism and exclusionism in relation to migrants. We first map the support for far right ideology among youth in Europe, and then use multilevel regression analysis (16,935 individuals nested in 30 locations) to investigate which individual or contextual factors are associated with a higher propensity among young people towards getting involved in far right movements.
AllportG. W., (1954), The Nature of Prejudice, Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
2.
ArzheimerK., (2009), ‘Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002’, American Journal of Political Science, 53 (2): 259–275.
3.
ArzheimerK. and CarterE., (2006), ‘Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success’, European Journal of Political Research, 45: 419–443.
4.
BetzH.-G., (1998), ‘Introduction’, in BetzH.-G. and ImmerfallS. (eds), The New Politics of the Right: Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies, 1–10, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
5.
BoomgaardenH. G. and VliegenthartR., (2007), ‘Explaining the rise of anti-immigrant parties: the role of news media content’, Electoral Studies, 26: 404–417.
6.
BustikovaL., (2014), ‘Revenge of the radical right’, Comparative Political Studies, 1–28, Online First, DOI: 10.1177/0010414013516069.
7.
BustikovaL. and KitscheltH., (2009), ‘The radical right in post-communist Europe: Comparative perspectives on legacies and party competition’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42: 459–483.
8.
CarterE., (2005), The Extreme Right in Western Europe: Success or Failure?Manchester: Manchester University Press.
9.
DollardJ.DoobL. W.MillerN. E.MowrerO. H. and SearsR. R., (1939), Frustration and Aggression, New Haven: Yale University Press.
10.
EspenshadeT. J. and HempsteadK., (1996), ‘Contemporary American attitudes toward U.S. immigration’, International Migration Review, 30 (2): 535–570.
11.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M. and ArmstrongT. L., (1998), ‘Intergroup competition and attitudes towards immigrants and immigration: an instrumental model of group conflict’, Journal of Social Issues, 54 (4): 699–724.
12.
EvansG. and WhitefieldS., (1993), ‘Identifying the bases of party competition in Eastern Europe’, British Journal of Political Science, 23 (4): 521–548.
13.
FetzerJ. S., (2000), Public Attitudes toward Immigration in the United States, France, and Germany, New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
GolderM., (2003), ‘Explaining variation in the success of extreme right parties in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 36 (4): 432–466.
15.
HjernM., (1998), ‘National identities, national pride and xenophobia: a comparison of four Western countries’, Acta Sociologica, 41: 335–347.
16.
HoxJ., (2010), Multilevel Analysis, Techniques and Applications, 2nd edn, New York: Routledge.
17.
IshiyamaJ., (2009), ‘Historical legacies and the size of the red-brown vote in post-communist politics’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42: 485–504.
18.
JackmanR. W. and VolpertK., (1996), ‘Conditions favouring parties of the extreme right in Western Europe’, British Journal of Political Science, 26 (4): 501–521.
19.
KääriäinenJ. and LehtonenH., (2006), ‘The variety of social capital in welfare state regimes – a comparative study of 21 countries’, European Societies, 8 (1): 27–57.
20.
KedarO., (2005), ‘When moderate voters prefer extreme parties: policy balancing in parliamentary elections’, The American Political Science Review, 99 (2): 185–199.
21.
KitscheltK., (2007), ‘Growth and persistence of the radical right in postindustrial democracies: advances and challenges in comparative research’, West European Politics, 30 (5): 1176–1206.
22.
KniggeP., (1998), ‘The ecological correlates of right-wing extremism in Western Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 34: 249–279.
23.
Lewin-EpsteinN. and LevanonA., (2005), ‘National identity and xenophobia in an ethnically divided society’, International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 7 (2): 90–118.
24.
LipsetS. M. and RaabE., (1978), The Politics of Unreason: Right-wing Extremism in America, 1790–1977, 2nd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
LubbersM.GijsbertsM. and SheepersP., (2002), ‘Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 41: 345–378.
26.
MaasC. J. M. and HoxJ. J., (2004), ‘Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis’, Statistica Neerlandic, 58 (2): 127–137.
27.
MauS.MewesJ. and SchoneckM., (2012), ‘What determines subjective socio-economic insecurity? Context and class in comparative perspective’, Socio-Economic Review, 10: 655–682.
28.
MinkenbergM., (2000), ‘The renewal of the radical right: between modernity and anti-modernity’, Government and Opposition, 35 (2): 170–188.
29.
MuddeC., (2000), The Ideology of the Extreme Right, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
30.
MuddeC., (2005), ‘Racist extremism in Central and Eastern Europe’, East European Politics and Societies, 19 (2): 161–184.
31.
MuddeC., (2007), Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MuddeC., (2010), ‘The populist radical right: a pathological normalcy’, West European Politics, 33(6): 1167–1186.
33.
NorrisP., (2005), Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market, New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Pop-ElechesG., (2010), ‘Throwing out the bums: protest voting and unorthodox parties after communism’, World Politics, 62 (2): 221–260.
35.
RydgrenJ., (2003), ‘Meso-level reasons for racism and xenophobia. some converging and diverging effects of radical right populism in France and Sweden’, European Journal of Social Theory, 6 (1): 45–68.
36.
RydgrenJ., (2005), ‘Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family’, European Journal of Political Research, 44: 413–437.
37.
SearsD. O. and HenryP. J., (2003), ‘The origins of symbolic racism’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (2): 259–275.
38.
SherifM. and SherifC. W., (1953), Groups in Harmony and Tension: An Integration of Studies on Intergroup Relation, New York: Harper and Brothers.
39.
SpiesD. and FranzmannS. T., (2011), ‘A two-dimensional approach to the political opportunity structure of extreme right parties in Western Europe’, West European Politics, 34 (5): 1044–1069.
40.
SwankD. and BetzH.-G., (2003), ‘Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe’, Socio-Economic Review, 1: 215–245.
41.
TajfelH. and TurnerJ. C., (1979), ‘An integrative theory of intergroup relations’, in AustinW. G. and WorchelS. (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33–47, Monterey: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.
42.
TootsA. and BachmannJ., (2010), ‘Contemporary welfare regimes in Baltic States: adapting postcommunist conditions to post-modern challenges’, Studies of Transition States and Societies, 2 (2): 31–44.
43.
van der BrugW.FennemaM. and TillieJ., (2005), ‘Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed: a two-step model of aggregate electoral support’, Comparative Political Studies, 38 (5): 537–573.
44.
YilmazF., (2012), ‘Right-wing hegemony and immigration: how the populist far-right achieved hegemony through the immigration debate in Europe’, Current Sociology, 60 (3): 368–381.
45.
ZawadzkiB., (1948), ‘Limitations on the scapegoat theory of justice’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43: 127–141.
