We employ the individual–opportunity nexus perspective to conceptualize entrepreneurial commitment of academic scientists as the pursuit and attainment of external grant funding. We develop and test a model of network characteristics and cognitive biases that predict the likelihood that scientists will commit to a grant opportunity and the likelihood of receiving an award. Using data from our national survey of faculty, we find that the illusion of control and overconfidence reduce grant submissions but increase awards. Collaboration network size increases submissions and awards. Strong ties are positively related to submissions and smaller networks of strong, highly capable collaborators receive more awards.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerP.S. & KwonS.W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
2.
AldrichH., RosenB., & WoodwardW. (Eds.). (1987). The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: A longitudinal study. In ChurchillN.S. (Ed.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 154–168).
3.
AldrichH., ZimmerC., SextonD., & SmilorR. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In SextonD. & SmilorR. (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
4.
AldrichH.E. & KimP.H. (2007). Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 147–165.
5.
AudretschD.B. & StephanP.E. (1996). Company–scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 641–652.
6.
BaronR.A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently from other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294.
7.
BaronR.A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic “why” questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221–239.
8.
BazermanM. (2006). Judgment in managerial decision making. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
9.
BecherT. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161.
10.
BirleyS. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107–117.
11.
BozemanB. & GaughanM. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694–707.
12.
BrownB. & ButlerJ.E. (1995). Competitors as allies: A study of entrepreneurial networks in the U.S. wine industry. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(3), 57–66.
13.
BruderlJ. & PreisendörferP. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded business. Small Business Economics, 10(3), 213–225.
14.
BurtR.S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
BurtR.S. (2000). Creating careers: Women's paths through entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
16.
BurtR.S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
BurtR.S. & MinorM.J. (1983). Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
BusenitzL. (1999). Entrepreneurial risk and strategic decision making: It's a matter of perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(3), 325–340.
19.
BusenitzL.W. & BarneyJ.B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision–making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.
20.
CassonM. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
21.
CohenJ., CohenP., WestS.G., & AikenL.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
ColeS.S. (2007). Research behavior that leads to success in obtaining grant funding: A model for success. Research Management Review, 15(2), 16–32.
23.
CooperA.C., DunkelbergW.C., & WooC.Y. (1988). Entrepreneur's perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 97–108.
24.
CorbettA.C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 473–491.
25.
CraneD. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
CrossR. & SproullL. (2004). More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15(4), 446–462.
27.
DavidssonP. & HonigB. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.
28.
De CarolisD.M., LitzkyB.E., & EddlestonK.A. (2009). Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 527–545.
29.
De CarolisD.M. & SaparitoP. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 41–56.
30.
DefazioD., LockettA., & WrightM. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305.
31.
DiamondA.M. (1985). The money value of citations to single–authored and multiple–authored articles. Scientometrics, 8, 312–320.
32.
DuhaimeI.M. & SchwenkC.R. (1985). Conjectures on cognitive simplification in acquisition and divestment decision making. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 287–295.
33.
EckhardtJ. & ShaneS. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349.
34.
EmmertM.A. & CrowM.M. (1989). The cooperative university research laboratory. Journal of Higher Education, 60(4), 408–422.
35.
FischoffB., GilovichT., GriffinD., & KahnemanD. (2002). Heuristics and biases in application. In GilovichT., GriffinD., & KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 730–748). Cabmridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
ForbesD.P. (2005). Are some entrepreneurs more confident than others?Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 623–640.
37.
FoxM.F. & MohapatraS. (2007). Social–organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral–granting departments. Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 542–571.
38.
GavinN.I., AdamsE.K., ManningW.G., Raskind–HoodC., & UratoM. (2007). The impact of welfare reform on insurance coverage before pregnancy and the timing of prenatal care initiation. Health Services Research, 42(4), 1564–1588.
39.
GranovetterM.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
40.
GranovetterM.S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
41.
GreveA. (1995). Networks and entrepreneurship—An analysis of social relations, occupational background, and use of contacts during the establishment process. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–24.
42.
HeffnerA.G. (1981). Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics, 3(1), 5–12.
43.
HilbeJ.M. (2007). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
HoangH. & AntoncicB. (2003). Network–based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.
45.
HogarthR.M. (1987). Judgment and choice. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
46.
HoughtonS.M., SimonM., AquinoK., & GoldbergC.B. (2000). No safety in numbers: Persistence of biases and their effects on team risk perception and team decision making. Group and Organization Management, 25, 325–353.
47.
HsuD.H. (2007). Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Research Policy, 36(5), 722–741.
48.
KatzJ.S. & MartinB.R. (1997). What is research collaboration?Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.
49.
KehH.T., FooM.D., & LimB.C. (2002). Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(Winter), 125–148.
50.
KenkelD.S. & TerzaJ.V. (2001). The effect of physician advice on alcohol consumption: Count regression with an endogenous treatment effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(2), 165–184.
51.
KirznerI. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
KrabelS. & MuellerP. (2009). What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists. Research Policy, 38(6), 947–956.
53.
KruegerN.J. (2003). The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. In AcsZ.J. & AudretschD.B. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 105–140). Lancaster, U.K.: Kluwer Academic.
54.
LangerE.J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328.
55.
LangerE.J. & RothJ. (1975). Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a chance event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 951–955.
56.
LarsonA. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 76–104.
57.
LeeS. & BozemanB. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.
58.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
LouisK.S., BlumentalD., GluckM.E., & StotoM.A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110–131.
60.
LoweR.A. & ZiedonisA.A. (2006). Overoptimism and the performance of managerial firms. Management Science, 52, 173–186.
61.
MarchJ.G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Free Press.
62.
MarinA. (2004). Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data. Social Networks, 26(4), 289–307.
63.
MarsM. & MetcalfeA. (2009). The entrepreneurial domains of American higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(5), 1–111.
64.
MarsM. & Rios–AguilarC. (2009). Academic entrepreneurship (re)defined: Significance and implications for the scholarship of higher education. Higher Education, 59(4), 441–460.
65.
MarsdenP.V. & CampbellK.E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63, 482–501.
66.
McArthyS.M., SchoormanF.D., & CooperA.C. (1993). Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: Rational decision–making or escalation of commitment?Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 9–24.
67.
MongeP.R. & ContractorN.S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
68.
MouwT., CookK.S., & MasseyD.S. (2006). Estimating the causal effect of social capital: A review of recent research. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 79–102.
69.
NahapietJ. & GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
70.
PalichL.E. & BagbyD.R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk–taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 425–438.
71.
PlousS. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw–Hill, Inc.
72.
PortesA. (1995). The economic sociology of immigration: Essays on networks, ethnicity, and entrepreneurship. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
73.
PowellW.W., CummingsL.L., & StawB.M. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
74.
RhotenD. & PfirmanS. (2007). Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36(1), 56–75.
75.
RouxI., PretoriusM., & MillardS. (2009). The influence of risk perception, misconception, illusion of control and self–efficacy on the decision to exploit a venture opportunity. Southern Africa Business Review, 10(1), 51–69.
76.
RowleyT., BehrensD., & KrackhardtD. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369–386.
77.
SandstromU. (2009). Combining curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: Mobility, gender and research performance. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 135–142.
78.
SantosJ.A. (1999). Cronbach's alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of Extension, 37(2), 1–5.
79.
SaxenianA. (1991). The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy, 20, 423–437.
80.
SchwarzN. & MarkP.Z. (1994). Judgment in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 123–162.
81.
SchwenkC.R. (1986). Information, cognitive biases, and commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 298–310.
82.
ScottJ. (2004). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage Publications.
83.
ShaneS. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual–opportunity nexus. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
84.
ShaneS. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
85.
ShaneS. & CableD. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.
86.
ShaneS. & VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
87.
SimonM. & HoughtonS.M. (2002). The relationship among biases, misperceptions and introducing pioneering products: Examining differences in venture decision contexts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 105–124.
88.
SimonM. & HoughtonS.M. (2003). The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 139–149.
89.
SimonM., HoughtonS.M., & AquinoK. (1999). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 113–134.
90.
SinghR.P., HillsG.E., LumpkinG.T., & HybelsR.C. (1999). The entrepreneurial opportunity recognition process: Examining the role of self–perceived alertness and social networks. Academy of Management Meeting.
91.
SlaughterS. & LeslieL.L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
92.
StarrJ.A. & MacMillanI.C. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 79–92.
93.
StephanP.E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1199–1235.
94.
StephanP.E. & El–GanainyA. (2007). The entrepreneurial puzzle: Explaining the gender gap. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 475–487.
95.
StevensonH.H. & JarilloJ.C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.
96.
StuartT.E., HoangH., & HybelsR.C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.
97.
StuartT.E. & SorensonO. (2005). Social networks and entrepreneurship. In AlvarezS.A., AgarwalR., & SorensonO. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 233–251). New York: Springer.
98.
TaylorR. (1975). Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision making performance. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 74.
99.
TerzaJ.V., BasuA., & RathouzP.J. (2008). Two–stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics, 27(3), 531–543.
100.
ThorsteinsdottirO. (2000). External research collaboration in two small science systems. Scientometrics, 49, 145–160.
101.
TorresL. & HuffmanM.L. (2004). Who benefits? Gender differences in returns to social network diversity. Research in the Sociology of Work, 14, 17–33.
102.
TverskyA. & KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
103.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
104.
VenkataramanS. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In KatzJ.S. & BrockhausR.H.S. (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
105.
WassermanS. & FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106.
WooldridgeJ.M. (2003). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
