In this study, we examine whether female entrepreneurs are held to a different standard than male entrepreneurs in obtaining financing from banks. To test this idea, we draw from the literature on signaling theory to propose that characteristics specific to the firm and the entrepreneur act as a means to communicate (i.e., signal) the inherent quality of the venture and thus impact the amount of capital the entrepreneur is able to obtain. We then explore the moderating role of gender based on gender role congruity theory to argue that capital providers reward the business characteristics of male and female entrepreneurs differently to the disadvantage of women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhlH. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621.
2.
AikenL.S. & WestS.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing an interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AldrichH.A. & AusterE. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of size and age and their strategic implications. In StawB.M. & CummingsL.L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 165–198). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4.
AnnaA.L., ChandlerG.N., JansenE., & MeroN.P. (2000). Women business owners in traditional and non–traditional industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 279–303.
5.
AreniusP. & AutioE. (2006). Financing of small businesses: Are Mars and Venus more alike than different?Venture Capital, 8(2), 93–107.
6.
ArthursJ.D., BusenitzL.W., HoskissonR.E., & JohnsonR.A. (2009). Signaling and initial public offerings: The use and impact of the lockup period. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 360–372.
7.
BarneyJ.B., BusenitzL., FietJ.O., & MoeselD. (1989). The structure of venture capital governance: An organizational economic analysis of relations between venture capital firms and new ventures. Best paper proceedings of the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
8.
BarNirA., GallaugherJ.M., & AugerP. (2003). Business process digitization, strategy, and the impact of firm age and size: The case of the magazine publishing industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 789–814.
9.
BaronR.A. (2002). OB and entrepreneurship: The reciprocal benefits of closer links. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 225–269.
10.
BartholomewS. & SmithA.D. (2006). Improving survey response rates from chief executive officers in small firms: The importance of social networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 83–96.
11.
BaumJ.A.C., CalabreseT., & SilvermanB.S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startup's performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 267–294.
12.
Becker–BleaseJ.R. & SohlJ.E. (2007). Do women–owned businesses have equal access to angel capital?Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 503–521.
13.
BellR.G., MooreC.B., & FilatotchevI. (2012). Strategic and institutional effects on foreign IPO performance: Examining the impact of country of origin, corporate governance, and host country effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 197–216.
14.
BergerA.N. & UdellG.F. (2003). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 613–673.
15.
BirdB. & BrushC. (2002). A gendered perspective on organization creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3), 41–65.
16.
BirleyS. & WestheadP. (1990). Growth and performance contrasts between “types” of small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7), 535–557.
17.
BosseD.A. & TaylorP.L.III (2012). The second glass ceiling impedes women entrepreneurs. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 52–68.
18.
BruniA., GherardiS., & PoggioB. (2004). Entrepreneur mentality, gender and the study of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(3), 256–268.
19.
BrunsV., HollandD.V., ShepherdD.A., & WiklundJ. (2008). The role of human capital in loan officers’ decision policies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 485–506.
20.
BrushC., CarterN., GatewoodE., GreeneP., & HartM. (2004). Clearing the hurdles: Women building high–growth businesses. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
BrushC., CarterN., GreeneP., GatewoodE., & HartM. (2001). An investigation of women–led firms and venture capital investment. Report to the US SBA Office of Advocacy/National Women's Business Council. Duxbury, MA: C. B. Associates.
22.
BrushC., CarterN., GreeneP., GatewoodE., & HartM. (2006). The use of bootstrapping by women entrepreneurs in positioning for growth. Venture Capital Journal, 8(2), 1–19.
23.
BrutonG.D., ChahineS., & FilatotchevI. (2009). Founders, private equity investors, and underpricing in entrepreneurial IPOs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 909–928.
24.
BusenitzL.W., FietJ.O., & MoeselD.D. (2005). Signaling in venture capitalist–new venture team funding decisions: Does it indicate long–term venture outcomes?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 1–12.
25.
ButtnerE.H. & RosenB. (1988). Funding new business ventures; are decision makers biased against women business owners?Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 249–261.
26.
CarliL.L. & EaglyA.H. (2011). Gender and leadership. In BrymanA., CollinsonD., GrintK., JacksonB., & Uhl–BienM. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 103–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27.
CarterN. & WilliamsM. (2003). Comparing social feminism and liberal feminism. In ButlerJ. (Ed.), New perspectives on women entrepreneurs (pp. 25–41). Greenwich, CT: IAP.
28.
CarterN.M., GartnerW.B., ShaverK.G., & GatewoodE.J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 13–39.
29.
CarterR.B., DarkF.H., & SinghA.K. (1998). Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long–run performance of IPO stocks. Journal of Finance, 53(1), 285–311.
30.
CarterS., ShawE., LamW., & WilsonF. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship, and bank lending: The criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in assessing applications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 427–444.
31.
CarterS., ShawE., WilsonF., & LamW. (2006). Gender, entrepreneurship and business finance: Investigating the relationship between banks and entrepreneurs in the UK. In BrushC.G., CarterN.M., GatewoodE.J., GreenerP.G., & HartM.M. (Eds.), Growth–orientated women entrepreneurs and their businesses: A global research perspective (pp. 373–391). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
32.
CassarG. (2004). The financing of business start–ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 261–283.
Center for Women and Enterprise (CWE). (2011). About us. Boston, MA: Center for Women and Enterprise. Available at http://cweonline.org, accessed 25 October 2011.
35.
CertoS.T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.
36.
ChagantiR., DeCarolisD., & DeedsD. (1995). Predictors of capital structure in small ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(2), 7–18.
37.
CliffJ.E. (1998). Does one size fit all? Exploring the relationship between attitudes towards growth, gender, and business size. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 523–542.
38.
CohenJ. & CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39.
ColemanS. (2002). Characteristics and borrowing behavior of small, women–owned firms: Evidence from the 1998 survey of small business finances. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 151–166.
40.
ColemanS. & RobbA. (2009). A comparison of new firm financing by gender: Evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey data. Small Business Economics, 33, 397–411.
41.
CollinsH. & MooreM.G. (1964). The enterprising man. East Lansing, MI: Bureau of Business and Economic Research, Michigan State University.
42.
ConnellyB.L., CertoS.T., IrelandR.D., & ReutzelC.R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.
43.
ConstantinidisC., CornetA., & AsandeiS. (2006). Financing of women–owned ventures: The impact of gender and other owner–and firm–related variables. Venture Capital, 8(2), 133–157.
44.
CorrellS.J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69(1), 93–113.
45.
CorrellS.J., BenardS., & PaikI. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1339.
46.
CovinJ.G. & SlevinD.P. (1997). High growth transitions: Theoretical perspectives and suggested directions. In SextonD. & SmilorR. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000 (pp. 99–126). Chicago, IL: Upstart Publishing Company.
47.
DailyC.M., CertoS.T., & DaltonD.R. (2005). Investment bankers and IPO pricing: Does prospectus information matter?Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 93–111.
48.
DeedsD.L., DeCarolisD.M., & CoombsJ.E. (1997). The impact of firm–specific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 31–46.
49.
DeTienneD.R. & ChandlerG.N. (2007). The role of gender in opportunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 365–386.
50.
DimovD., ShepherdD.A., & SutcliffeK.M. (2007). Requisite expertise, firm reputation, and status in venture capital investment allocation decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 481–502.
51.
EaglyA. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social–role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
EaglyA.H. & CarliL.L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
53.
EaglyA.H. & ChinJ.L. (2010). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American Psychologist, 65(3), 216–224.
54.
EaglyA.H. & KarauS.J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.
55.
EbbenJ. & JohnsonA. (2006). Bootstrapping in small firms: An empirical analysis of change over time. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 851–865.
56.
EddlestonK.A. & PowellG.N. (2008). The role of gender identity in explaining sex differences in business owners’ career satisfier preferences. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 244–256.
57.
FairlieR.W. & RobbA.M. (2009). Gender differences in business performance: Evidence from the Characteristics of Business Owners survey. Small Business Economics, 33, 375–395.
58.
FayM. & WilliamsL. (1993). Gender bias and the availability of business loans. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 363–377.
59.
FiskeS.T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In GilbertD.T., FiskeS.T., & LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357–411). Boston: McGraw–Hill.
60.
ForbesD.P., KorsgaardM.A., & SapienzaH.J. (2010). Financing decisions as a source of conflict in venture boards. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 579–592.
61.
FoschiM. (1989). Status characteristics, standards, and attributions. In BergerJ., ZelditchM.Jr., & AndersonB. (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: New formulations (pp. 58–72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62.
FoschiM. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 21–42.
63.
FraserS. (2005). Finance for small and medium sized enterprises: A report on the 2004 UK Survey of SME Finances. Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry.
64.
GoranovaM., AlessandriT.M., BrandesP., & DharwadkarR. (2007). Managerial ownership and corporate diversification: A longitudinal view. Strategic Management Journal, 28(3), 211–225.
65.
GreeneP.G., BrushC.G., HartM.M., & SaparitoP. (2001). Patterns of venture capital funding: Is gender a factor?Venture Capital, 3(1), 63–83.
66.
GuptaV.K., TurbanD., WastiS.A., & SikdarA. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 397–417.
67.
HainesG.H.Jr, OrserB.J., & RidingA.L. (1999). Myths and realities: An empirical study of banks and the gender of small business clients. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 16(4), 291–307.
68.
HaynesG.W., RoweB.R., WalkerR., & HongG.S. (2000). The differences in financial structure between women– and men–owned family businesses. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21(3), 209–226.
69.
HeidrickT. & NicolT. (2002). Financing SMEs in Canada: Barriers faced by women, youth, aboriginal and minority entrepreneurs in accessing capital. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Industry Canada.
70.
HeilmanM.E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.
71.
HillF.M., LeitchC.M., & HarrisonR.T. (2006). “Desperately seeking finance?” The demand for finance by women–owned and–led businesses. Venture Capital, 8(2), 159–182.
72.
HolbrookA., KrosnickJ., & PfentA. (2007). The causes and consequences of response rates in surveys by the news media and government contractor survey research firms. In LepkowskiJ.M., Clyde TuckerN., Michael BrickJ., De LeeuwE.D., JapecL., LavrakasP.J., et al. (Eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology (pp. 499–528). New York: Wiley.
73.
JainB.A., JayaramanN., & KiniO. (2008). The path–to–profitability of Internet IPO firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 165–194.
74.
JenningsJ.E. & BrushC.G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature?Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663–715.
75.
JenningsJ.E. & McDougaldM.S. (2007). Work–family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice. Academy of Management Review, 32, 747–760.
76.
KallebergA.L. & LeichtK.T. (1991). Gender and organizational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 136–161.
77.
KeplerE. & ShaneS. (2007). Are male and female entrepreneurs really that different?Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy. Available at http://www.sba.gov, accessed 12 October 2007.
78.
KirschD., GoldfarbB., & GeraA. (2009). Form or substance: The role of business plans in venture capital decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 487–515.
79.
LeitchC.M. & HillF.M. (2006). Guest editorial: Women and the financing of entrepreneurial ventures: More pieces for the jigsaw. Venture Capital, 8(1), 1–14.
80.
LingY. & KellermannsF.W. (2010). The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: The moderating role of information exchange frequency. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 322–344.
81.
LoscoccoK. & Smith–HunterA. (2004). Women home–based business owners: Insights from comparative analyses. Women in Management Review, 19(3), 164–173.
82.
MadillJ.J., HainesG.H.Jr, & RidingA.L. (2005). The role of angels in technology SMEs: A link to venture capital. Venture Capital, 7(2), 107–129.
83.
MarlowS. & PattonD. (2005). All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 717–735.
84.
McCarthyA.M., SchoormanF.D., & CooperA.C. (1993). Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: Rational decision–making or escalation of commitment?Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 9–24.
85.
MittenessC., SudekR., & CardonM.S. (2012). Angel investor characteristics that determine whether perceived passion leads to higher evaluations of funding potential. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 592–606.
86.
MorrisM.H., MiyasakiN.N., WattersC.E., & CoombesS.M. (2006). The dilemma of growth: Understanding venture size choices of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 221–244.
87.
MurphyP.J., KickulJ., BarbosaS.D., & TitusL. (2007). Expert capital and perceived legitimacy: Female–run entrepreneurial venture signaling and performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation, 8(2), 127–138.
88.
NeeleyL. & Van AukenH. (2010). Differences between female and male entrepreneurs’ use of bootstrap financing. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 19–34.
89.
OrserB.J. & FosterM.K. (1994). Lending practices and Canadian women in micro–based businesses. Women in Management Review, 9(5), 11–19.
90.
OrserB.J., RidingA.L., & ManleyK. (2006). Women entrepreneurs and financial capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(3), 643–665.
91.
OzmelU., ReuerJ.J., & GulatiR. (2013). Signals across multiple networks: How venture capital and alliance networks affect interorganizational collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 852–866.
92.
ParkN.K. & MeziasJ.M. (2005). Before and after the technology sector crash: The effect of environmental munificence on stock market response to alliances of e–commerce firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 987–1007.
93.
PodsakoffP.M. & OrganD.W. (1986). Self–reports in organizational research: Problems and perspectives. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.
94.
PowellG.N. (2011). Women and men in management (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
95.
PowellG.N. & ButterfieldD.A. (1989). The “good manager”: Did androgyny fare better in the 1980s?Group and Organization Studies, 14(2), 216–233.
96.
PowellG.N. & ButterfieldD.A. (2003). Gender, gender identity, and aspirations to top management. Women in Management Review, 18, 88–96.
97.
PowellG.N., ButterfieldD.A., & ParentJ.D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?Journal of Management, 28, 177–193.
98.
PowellG.N. & EddlestonK.A. (2013). Linking family–to–business enrichment and support to entrepreneurial success: Do female and male entrepreneurs experience different outcomes?Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 261–280.
99.
PrasadD., BrutonG.D., & VozikisG. (2000). Signaling value to business angels: The proportion of the entrepreneur's net worth invested in a new venture as a decision signal. Venture Capital, 2(3), 167–182.
100.
ReuberA.R. & FischerE. (2005). The company you keep: How young firms in different competitive contexts signal reputation through their customers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 57–78.
101.
RidgewayC.L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 637–655.
102.
RidgewayC.L. (2012). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Social Forces, 92(1), 401–405.
103.
RidgewayC.L. (2014). Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 1–16.
104.
RidgewayC.L. & CorrellS.J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531.
105.
RidingA.L. & SwiftC.S. (1990). Women business owners and terms of credit: Some empirical findings of the Canadian experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 327–340.
106.
ScheinV.E. & MuellerR. (1992). Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 439–447.
107.
ScheinV.E., MuellerR., LituchyT., & LiuJ. (1996). Think manager—think male: A global phenomenon?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33–41.
108.
SpectorP.E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.
109.
SpenceA.M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
110.
SpenceA.M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92, 434–459.
111.
StinchcombeA.L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In MarchJ.G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Company.
112.
TornikoskiE.T. & NewbertS.L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 311–335.
113.
VerheulI. & ThurikR. (2001). Start–up capital: Does gender matter?Small Business Economics, 16, 329–345.
114.
WiklundJ., PatzeltH., & ShepherdD.A. (2009). Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small Business Economics, 32, 351–374.
115.
WiklundJ. & ShepherdD. (2003). Knowledge–based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium–sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.
116.
WilsonF., CarterS., TaggS., ShawE., & LamW. (2007). Bank loan officers’ perceptions of business owners: The role of gender. British Journal of Management, 18, 154–171.
117.
WintonA. & YerramilliV. (2008). Entrepreneurial finance: Banks versus venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(1), 51–79.
118.
WoodW. & EaglyA.H. (2010). Gender. In FiskeS.T., GilbertD.T., & LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 629–667). New York: Oxford University Press.
119.
WuZ. & ChuaJ.H. (2012). Second–order gender effects: The case of U.S. small business borrowing cost. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 443–463.
120.
ZimmermanM.A., TreichelM., & ScottJ. (2006). Women–owned businesses and access to bank credit: A time series perspective (evidence from three surveys since 1987). Venture Capital, 8(1), 51–67.
121.
ZimmermanM.A. & ZietzG.J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414–431.
122.
ZottC. & HuyQ.N. (2007). How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 70–105.
