Drawing on the literature on social ties, we develop a model toward entrepreneurs’ assessments of early international entry. We argue that social ties in foreign markets trigger entrepreneurs’ assessed attractiveness of exploiting potentially valuable opportunities contingent on their perceptions of the venture's absorptive capacity and their generalized trust in others. We test these hypotheses using a metric conjoint experiment, and data on 4,352 international entry assessments nested within 136 entrepreneurs. Our findings reveal significant cross–level interactions between the characteristics of entrepreneurs’ social ties, venture absorptive capacity, and entrepreneurs’ trust in others in explaining how they assess international entry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerP.S. & KwonS.–W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
2.
ADT. (2009). Bundesverband Deutscher Innovations–, Technologie– und Gründerzentren e.V, Available at www.adt–online.de, accessed 15 September 2009.
3.
AertsK., MatthyssensP., & VandenbemptK. (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, 27(5), 254–267.
4.
AgarwalJ. & FeilsD. (2007). Political risk and the internationalization of firms: An empirical study of Canadian–based export and FDI firms. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24(3), 165–181.
5.
AguinisH., GottfredsonR.K., & CulpepperS.A. (2013). Best–practice recommendations for estimating cross–level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490–1528.
6.
AndersenP.H. (2006). Listening to the global grapevine: SME export managers’ personal contacts as a vehicle for export information generation. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 81–96.
7.
AreniusP. (2005). The psychic distance postulate revised: From market selection to speed of market penetration. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 115–131.
8.
ArmstrongJ.S. & OvertonT.S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.
9.
AutioE., SapienzaH.J., & AlmeidaJ.G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.
10.
BaronR.A. & EnsleyM.D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52(9), 1331–1344.
11.
BloodgoodJ.M., SapienzaH.J., & AlmeidaJ.G. (1996). The internationalization of new high–potential U.S. ventures: Antecedents and outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(4), 61–76.
12.
BrykA.S. & RaudenbushS.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
CasillasJ.C., MorenoA.M., AcedoF.J., GallegoM.A., & RamosE. (2009). An integrative model of the role of knowledge in the internationalization process. Journal of World Business, 44(3), 311–322.
15.
CassarG. (2010). Are individuals entering self–employment overly optimistic? An empirical test of plans and projections on nascent entrepreneur expectations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 822–840.
16.
ChampouxJ.E. & PetersW.S. (1987). Form, effect size and power in moderated regression analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60(3), 243–255.
17.
ChandraY., StylesC., & WilkinsonI. (2009). The recognition of first time international entrepreneurial opportunities: Evidence from firms in knowledge–based industries. International Marketing Review, 26(1), 30–61.
18.
ChettyS. & Campbell–HuntC. (2003). Explosive international growth and problems of success amongst small to medium–sized firms. International Small Business Journal, 21(1), 5–27.
19.
ChoiY.R. & ShepherdD.A. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ decisions to exploit opportunities. Journal of Management, 30(3), 377–395.
20.
ChoiY.R. & ShepherdD.A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management, 31(4), 573–596.
21.
CloningerP.A. & OviattB. (2007). Service content and the internationalization of young ventures: An empirical test. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 233–256.
22.
CohenW.M. & LevinthalD.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
23.
ColomboM.G. & GrilliL. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology–based firms: A competence–based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795–816.
24.
ColquittJ.A., ScottB.A., & LePineJ.A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta–analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927.
25.
CostaP.T. & McCraeR.R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six–year longitudinal study of self–reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 853–863.
26.
CouchL.L. & JonesW.H. (1997). Measuring levels of trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 319–336.
27.
CovielloN.E. (2015). Re–thinking research on born globals. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 17–26.
28.
CovielloN.E. (2006). The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 713–731.
29.
CovielloN.E. & CoxM.P. (2006). The resource dynamics of international new venture networks. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 4(2–3), 113–132.
30.
CovielloN.E. & JonesM.V. (2004). Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485–508.
31.
CovielloN.E. & MunroH.J. (1997). Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms. International Business Review, 6(4), 361–386.
32.
DenisonD.R., DuttonJ.E., KahnJ.A., & HartS.L. (1996). Organizational context and the interpretation of strategic issues: A note on CEOs’ interpretations of foreign investment. Journal of Management Studies, 33(4), 453–474.
33.
DeutschM. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279.
34.
EllisP.D. & PecotichA. (2001). Social factors influencing export initiation in small and medium–sized enterprises. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 119–130.
35.
ErikssonK. & ChettyS. (2003). The effect of experience and absorptive capacity on foreign market knowledge. International Business Review, 12(6), 673–695.
36.
FeltovichP.J., PrietulaM.J., & EricssonK.A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In EricssonK.A., CharnessN., FeltovichP.J., & HoffmanR.R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
ForbesD.P. (2005). Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others?Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 623–640.
38.
GraceG.D. & SchillT. (1986). Social support and coping style differences in subjects high and low in interpersonal trust. Psychological Reports, 59, 584–586.
39.
GranovetterM.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
40.
GreenP.E., KriegerA.M., & WindY. (2001). Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces, 31(3), S56–S73.
41.
GrégoireD.A., CorbettA.C., & McMullenJ.S. (2011). The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1443–1477.
42.
HabibM. & ZurawickiL. (2002). Corruption and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 291–307.
43.
HairJ.F., BlackW.C., BabinB.J., AndersonR.E., & TathamR.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
44.
HansenM.T. (1999). The search–transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.
45.
HansenM.T., MorsM.L., & LøvåsB. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776–793.
46.
HaynieJ.M., ShepherdD.A., & McMullenJ.S. (2009). An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 337–361.
47.
HedgesL.V. & HedbergE.C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group–randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(1), 60–87.
48.
HoxJ.J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.
49.
JexS.M. & BlieseP.D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work–related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 349–361.
50.
KidwellR.E.J., MossholderK.W., & BennettN. (1997). Cohesiveness and organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis using work groups and individuals. Journal of Management, 23(6), 775–793.
51.
KissA.N. & DanisW.M. (2008). Country institutional context, social networks, and new venture internationalization speed. European Management Journal, 26(6), 388–399.
52.
KnightG.A. & CavusgilS.T. (2004). Innovation organizational capabilities and the born–global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141.
53.
LaneP.J., KokaB.R., & PathakS. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863.
54.
LarrañetaB., ZahraS.A., & GonzálezJ.L.G. (2012). Enriching strategic variety in new ventures through external knowledge. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(4), 401–413.
55.
LindstrandA., MelénS., & NordmanE.R. (2011). Turning social capital into business: A study of the internationalization of biotech SMEs. International Business Review, 20(2), 194–212.
56.
LoaneS. & BellJ. (2006). Rapid internationalisation among entrepreneurial firms in Australia, Canada, Ireland and New Zealand: An extension to the network approach. International Marketing Review, 23(5), 467–485.
57.
MalhotraS., SivakumarK., & ZhuP. (2009). Distance factors and target market selection: The moderating effect of market potential. International Marketing Review, 26(6), 651–673.
58.
MathieuJ.E., AguinisH., CulpepperS.A., & ChertG. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross–level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 951–966.
59.
MayerR.C., DavisJ.H., & SchoormanF.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
60.
McCraeR.R. & AllikJ. (Eds.). (2002). The five–factor model of personality across cultures. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
McKnightD.H., CummingsL.L., & ChervanyN.L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.
63.
McMullenJ.S. & ShepherdD.A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31, 132–152.
64.
MerikleP.M. & JoordensS. (1997). Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 6(2–3), 219–236.
65.
MitchellJ.R. & ShepherdD.A. (2010). To thine own self be true: Images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 138–154.
66.
MitraD. & GolderP.N. (2002). Whose culture matters? Near–market knowledge and its impact on foreign market entry timing. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(3), 350–365.
67.
MooradianT., RenzlB., & MatzlerK. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37(4), 523–540.
68.
MusteenM., FrancisJ., & DattaD.K. (2010). The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance: A study of Czech SMEs. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 197–205.
69.
NahapietJ. & GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
70.
OstendorfF. & AngleithnerA. (2004). NEO–PI–R NEO–Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und mccrae [NEO–personality inventory after costa and mccrae]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
71.
OviattB.M. & McDougallP. (1995). Global start–ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(2), 30–43.
72.
OviattB.M. & McDougallP.P. (2005). Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 537–553.
73.
PhanP.H., SiegelD.S., & WrightM. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182.
74.
PriemR.L. & HarrisonD.A. (1994). Exploring strategic judgment: Methods for testing the assumptions of prescriptive contingency theories. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 311–324.
75.
RaudenbushS.W. & BrykA.S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76.
ReagansR. & McEvilyB. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.
77.
RiceM.P. (2002). Co–production of business assistance in business incubators: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163–187.
78.
RodanS. & GalunicC. (2004). More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 541–562.
79.
RotterJ.B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443–452.
80.
RotterJ.B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1–7.
81.
SchererR.F., BrodzinskiJ.D., & WiebeF.A. (1990). Entrepreneur career selection and gender: A socialization approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 28(2), 37–44.
82.
SchillT., TovesC., & RamanaiahN. (1980). Interpersonal trust and coping with stress. Psychological Reports, 47, 1192.
83.
SharmaD.D. & BlomstermoA. (2003). The internationalization process of born globals: A network view. International Business Review, 12(6), 739–753.
84.
ShepherdD.A. (1999). Venture capitalists’ assessment of new venture survival. Management Science, 45(5), 621–632.
85.
ShepherdD.A., McMullenJ.S., & JenningsP.D. (2007). The formation of opportunity beliefs: Overcoming ignorance and reducing doubt. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 75–95.
86.
ShepherdD.A. & ZacharakisA. (1997). Conjoint analysis: A window of opportunity for entrepreneurship research. In KatzJ. (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (pp. 203–248). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
87.
ShepherdD.A. & ZacharakisA. (1999). Conjoint analysis: A new methodological approach for researching the decision policies of venture capitalists. Venture Capital, 1(3), 197–217.
88.
SnijdersT.A.B. & BoskerR.J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
89.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
90.
Von HippelE. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40, 429–439.
91.
YakovlevaM., ReillyR.R., & WerkoR. (2010). Why do we trust? Moving beyond individual to dyadic perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 79–91.
92.
ZahraS.A. & HaytonJ.C. (2008). The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 195–220.
93.
ZhouL. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and foreign market knowledge on early internationalization. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 281–293.
94.
ZhouL., WuW.–P., & LuoX. (2007). Internationalization and the performance of born–global SMEs: The mediating role of social networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 673–690.
