Legal rules and the economic environment play an important role in the decision to become an entrepreneur. Many studies examine the effect of such institutions at the national or state level. The metropolitan area may be a more appropriate geography to examine, since entrepreneurs often serve a more localized market and there is wide variation in both the environment for and incidence of proprietorship among metropolitan areas. We find that proprietorship increases with home equity, intangible wealth, unemployment, relative earnings of proprietors, and population. It decreases with higher state income tax rates and minimum wages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcemogluD., JohnsonS., & RobinsonJ.A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. The American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
2.
AcsZ.J. & ArmingtonC. (2004). The impact of geographic differences in human capital on service firm formation rates. Journal of Urban Economics, 56, 244–278.
3.
AcsZ., BraunerhjelmP., AudretschD., & CarlssonB. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32, 15–30.
4.
AcsZ., GlaeserE., LitanR., FlemingL., GoetzS.J., KerrW., et al. (2008). Entrepreneurship and urban success: Toward a policy consensus. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1092493, accessed March 2012.
5.
Alba–RamirezA. (1994). Self–employment in the midst of unemployment: The case of Spain and the United States. Applied Economics, 26, 189–204.
6.
AnselinL., VargaA., & AcsZ. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422–448.
7.
ArdagnaS. & LusardiA. (2008). Explaining international differences in entrepreneurship: The role of individual characteristics and regulatory constraints. NBER working paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
ArmingtonC. & AcsZ.J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36, 33–45.
9.
AudretschD. & FeldmanM. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.
10.
AudretschD. & FeldmanM. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2713–2739.
11.
AudretschD. & KeilbachM. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242–1254.
12.
AudretschD. & LehmannE. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions?Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202.
13.
AudretschD., LehmannE., & WarningS. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34, 1113–1122.
14.
AudretschD.B. & FritschM. (1999). The industry component of regional new firm formation processes. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 239–252.
15.
AudretschD.B. & StephanP. (1996). Company–scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, 86, 641–652.
16.
BatesT. (2005). Analysis of young, small firms that have closed: Delineating successful from unsuccessful closures. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 343–358.
17.
BeckN. & KatzJ. (1996). Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time–series–cross–section models. Political Analysis, 6, 1–36.
18.
BeesonP., DeJongD., & TroeskenW. (2001). Population growth in U.S. counties, 1840–1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31, 669–699.
19.
BlackJ., De MezaD., & JeffreysD. (1996). House prices, the supply of collateral and the enterprise economy. The Economic Journal, 106, 60–75.
20.
BlackburnM. (2008). Are union wage differentials in the United States falling?Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 47, 390–418.
21.
BlanchflowerD. (2000). Self–employment in OECD countries. Labour Economics, 7, 471–505.
22.
BlanchflowerD.G., OswaldA., & StutzerA. (2001). Latent entrepreneurship across nations. European Economic Review, 45, 680–691.
23.
BlanchflowerD.G. & OswaldA.J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur?Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 26–60.
24.
BlauD.M. (1987). A time–series analysis of self–employment in the United States. The Journal of Political Economy, 95, 445–467.
25.
BlochF. & KuskinM. (1978). Wage determination in the union and nonunion sectors. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 31, 183–192.
26.
BruceD. (2000). Effects of the United States tax system on transitions into self–employment. Labour Economics, 7, 545–574.
27.
BruceD. & MohsinM. (2006). Tax policy and entrepreneurship: New time series evidence. Small Business Economics, 26, 409–425.
28.
CarrascoR. (1999). Transitions to and from self–employment in Spain: An empirical analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 315–341.
29.
CarrollR., Holtz–EakinD., RiderM., & RosenH. (2000). Entrepreneurs, income taxes and investment. In SlemrodJ.B. (Ed.), Does Atlas shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich (pp. 427–455). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
CowlingM. & MitchellP. (1997). The evolution of UK self–employment: A study of government policy and the role of the macroeconomy. The Manchester School, 65, 427–442.
31.
CressyR. (1996). Are business startups debt–rationed?The Economic Journal, 106, 1253–1270.
32.
CullenJ. & GordonR. (2002). Taxes and entrepreneurial activity: Theory and evidence for the U.S. NBER working paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
33.
DavidssonP., LindmarkL., & OlofssonC. (1994). New firm formation and regional development in Sweden. Regional Studies, 28, 395–410.
34.
De BlasioG. & Di AddarioS. (2005). Do workers benefit from industrial agglomeration?Journal of Regional Science, 45, 797–827.
35.
DjankovS., GanserT., McLieshC., RamalhoR., & ShleiferA. (2008). The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. NBER working paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
36.
DunganA. (2010). Sole proprietorship returns, 2008. Statistics of Income Bulletin, Summer, 1–66.
37.
DunnT. & Holtz–EakinD. (2000). Financial capital, human capital, and the transition to self–employment: Evidence from intergenerational links. Journal of Labor Economics, 18, 282–305.
38.
EarleJ. & SakovaZ. (2000). Business start–ups or disguised unemployment? Evidence on the character of self–employment from transition economies. Labour Economics, 7, 575–601.
39.
EngströmP. & HolmlundB. (2009). Tax evasion and self–employment in a high–tax country: Evidence from Sweden. Applied Economics, 41, 2419–2430.
40.
EvansD. & JovanovicB. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. The Journal of Political Economy, 97, 808–827.
41.
EvansD. & LeightonL. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. The American Economic Review, 79, 519–535.
42.
FairlieR.W. & KrashinskyH.A. (2006). Liquidity constraints, household wealth, and entrepreneurship revisited. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California.
43.
FeenbergD. & CouttsE. (1993). An introduction to the Taxsim model. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12, 189–194.
44.
FeldmanM.P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 861–891.
45.
FreytagA. & ThurikR. (2007). Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross–country setting. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 117–131.
46.
FritschM. (1992). Regional differences in new firm formation: Evidence from West Germany. Regional Studies, 26, 233–241.
47.
FritschM. (1997). New firms and regional employment change. Small Business Economics, 9, 437–448.
48.
FritschM., MuellerP., & WeyhA. (2005). Direct and indirect effects of new business formation on regional employment. Applied Economics Letters, 12, 545–548.
49.
GarrettT.A. & WallH. (2006). Creating a policy environment for entrepreneurs. Federal Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2005–064B. St. Louis, MO: Federal Bank of St. Louis.
50.
GentryW. & HubbardR. (2000). Tax policy and entrepreneurial entry. American Economic Review, 2, 283–287.
51.
GiladB. & LevineP. (1986). A behavioral model of entrepreneurial supply. Journal of Small Business Management, 24, 45–51.
52.
GimenoJ., FoltaR., CooperA., & WooC. (2000). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Small Business, 42, 750–783.
53.
GlaeserE.L. (2007). Entrepreneurship and the city. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
54.
GoetzS. & FreshwaterD. (2001). State–level determinants of entrepreneurship and a preliminary measure of entrepreneurial climate. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 58–70.
55.
GoetzS. & RupasinghaA. (2009). Determinants of growth in non–farm proprietor densities in the U.S., 1990–2000. Small Business Economics, 32, 425–438.
56.
GohmannS.F. (2012). Institutions, latent entrepreneurship, and self–employment: An international comparison. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 295–321.
57.
GohmannS.F., HobbsB.K., & McCrickardM.J. (2008). Economic freedom and service industry growth in the United States. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 855–874.
58.
GreeneW.H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
59.
GriloI. & IrigoyenJ.M. (2006). Entrepreneurship in the EU: To wish and not to be. Small Business Economics, 26, 305–318.
60.
GriloI. & ThurikR. (2005). Latent and actual entrepreneurship in Europe and the U.S.: Some recent developments. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1, 441–459.
61.
GriloI. & ThurikR. (2008). Determinants of entrepreneurial engagement levels in Europe and the U.S.Industrial and Corporate Change, 17, 1113–1145.
62.
GrossmanG. & HelpmanE. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. NBER Working Paper No. W3485. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
63.
HamiltonB.H. (2000). Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns of self–employment. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 604–631.
64.
HamiltonR. (1989). Unemployment and business formation rates: Reconciling time series and cross section evidence. Environment and Planning, 21, 249–255.
65.
HigginsM., LevyD., & YoungA. (2006). Growth and convergence across the United States: Evidence from county–level data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 671–681.
66.
HirschB. & MacphersonD.A. (2003). Union membership and coverage database from the current population survey: Note. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56, 349–354.
67.
Holtz–EakinD., JoulfaianD., & RosenH. (1994). Sticking it out: Entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 53–75.
68.
HurstE. & LusardiA. (2004). Liquidity constraints, household wealth, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 319–347.
KeuschniggC. & NielsenS. (2003). Tax policy, venture capital, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 175–203.
71.
KirchhoffB.A., NewbertS.L., HasanI., & ArmingtonC. (2007). The influence of university R&D expenditures on new business formations and employment growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 543–559.
72.
LazearE. (2004). Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 94, 208–211.
73.
LeeS.Y., FloridaR., & AcsZ.J. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies, 38, 879–892.
74.
LindhT. & OhlssonH. (1996). Self–employment and windfall gains: Evidence from the Swedish lottery. The Economic Journal, 106, 1515–1526.
75.
LongJ. (1982). The income tax and self–employment. National Tax Journal, 35, 31–42.
76.
LucasR. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 508–523.
77.
MaleckiE. (1984). Military spending and the U.S. defense industry: Regional patterns of military contracts and subcontracts. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2, 31–44.
78.
ManserM. & PicotG. (1999). The role of self–employment in U.S. and Canadian job growth. Monthly Labor Review, 122, 10–25.
79.
McMullenJ., BagbyD., & PalichL. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 875–895.
80.
MooreC. & MuellerR. (2002). The transition from paid to self–employment in Canada: The importance of push factors. Applied Economics, 34, 791–801.
81.
MuellerP. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35, 1499–1508.
82.
MurphyK.M., ShleiferA., & VishnyR.W. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 503–530.
83.
NorthD.C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. London, U.K.: Norton.
84.
NorthD.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
85.
NorthD.C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84, 359–368.
86.
ParkerS. & RobsonM. (2004). Explaining international variations in self–employment: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Southern Economic Journal, 71, 287–301.
87.
ParkerS. & Van PraagC. (2006). Schooling, capital constraints, and entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 24, 416–431.
88.
ParkerS.C. (2004). The economics of self–employment and entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89.
ParkerS.C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. New York: Cambridge Books.
90.
PodestàF. (2006). Comparing time series cross–section model specifications: The case of welfare state development. Quality and Quantity, 40, 539–559.
91.
ReynoldsP., MillerB., & MakiW. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics, 7, 389–407.
92.
RitsiläJ. & TervoH. (2002). Effects of unemployment on new firm formation: Micro–level panel data evidence from Finland. Small Business Economics, 19, 31–40.
93.
RomerP. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3–22.
94.
RosenS. (1981). The economics of superstars. The American Economic Review, 71, 845–858.
95.
RosenthalS. & StrangeW. (2008). The attenuation of human capital spillovers. Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 373–389.
96.
ScarpettaS. & TresselT. (2004). Boosting productivity via innovation and adoption of new technologies: Any role for labor market institutions? World Bank Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
97.
SchuetzeH. (2000). Taxes, economic conditions and recent trends in male self–employment: A Canada–U.S. comparison. Labour Economics, 7, 507–544.
98.
ShaneS. (1996). Explaining variation in rates of entrepreneurship in the United States: 1899–1988. Journal of Management, 22, 747–781.
99.
ShaneS., KolvereidL., & WestheadP. (1991). An exploratory examination of the reasons leading to new firm formation across country and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 431–446.
100.
SmithA. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Methuen & Co.
101.
StaberU. & BögenholdD. (1993). Self–employment: A study of seventeen OECD countries. Industrial Relations Journal, 24, 126–137.
102.
StephenF., UrbanoD., & van HemmenS. (2009). The responsiveness of entrepreneurs to working time regulations. Small Business Economics, 32, 259–276.
103.
StoreyD. (1991). The birth of new firms—does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 3, 167–178.
104.
TaylorM. (1996). Earnings, independence or unemployment: Why become self–employed?Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58, 253–266.
105.
ThurikA., CarreeM., van StelA., & AudretschD. (2008). Does self–employment reduce unemployment?Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 673–686.
106.
TorriniR. (2005). Cross–country differences in self–employment rates: The role of institutions. Labour Economics, 12, 661–683.
107.
Van Der ZwanP., ThurikR., & GriloI. (2008). The entrepreneurial ladder and its determinants. Applied Economics, 42, 2183–2191.
108.
Van PraagC. & VerslootP. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29, 351–382.
109.
Van StelA., StoreyD., & ThurikA. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28, 171–186.
110.
VerheulI., ThurikR., GriloI., & Van Der ZwanP. (2012). Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self–employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality. Journal Of Economic Psychology, 33, 325–341.
111.
VerheulI., WennekersS., AudretschD., & ThurikR. (2002). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: Policies, institutions and culture. In AudretschD., ThurikR., VerheulI., & WennekersS. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European–U.S. comparison (pp. 11–81). New York: Springer.
112.
WennekersS., Van WennekersA., ThurikR., & ReynoldsP. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24, 293–309.
113.
WooldridgeJ. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
