Currents in Contemporary Bioethics

Manning M. Hudgins L. , and Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee, “Array-Based Technology and Recommendations for Utilization in Medical Genetics Practice for Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities,” Genetics in Medicine 12, no. 11 (2010): 742–745.

Boone P. M. , “Detection of Clinically Relevant Exonic Copy-Number Changes by Array CGH,” Human Mutation 31, no. 12 (2010): 1326–1342.

Müller A. Holzmann K. , and Kestler H. A. , “Visualization of Genomic Aberrations using Affymetrix SNP Arrays,” Bioinformatics 23, no. 4 (2007): 496–497

Conlin L. K. Thiel B. D. , and Bonnemann C. G. , “Mechanisms of Mosaicism, Chimerism and Uniparental Disomy Identified by Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Analysis,” Human Molecular Genetics 19, no. 4 (2010): 1263–1275.

Schaaf C. P. Scott D.A. Wiszniewska J. Beaudet A. , “Identification of Incestuous Parental Relationships by SNP-Based DNA Microarrays,” The Lancet 377, no. 9765 (2011): 555–556.

National Conference of State Legislatures, “Genetic Privacy Laws,” 2007, available at <http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/Health/GeneticPrivacyLaws/tabid/14287/Default.aspx> (last visited December 11, 2012); Wang M. J. , Genetic Testing – Specific Informed Consent (March 20, 2012) (unpublished research, on file with Baylor College of Medicine).

See Wang , supra note 6.

Wilfond B. and Ross L. F. , “From Genetics to Genomics: Ethics, Policy, and Parental Decision-Making,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology 34, no. 6(2009): 639–647.

The Oath, by Hippocrates, written 400 BCE, translated by Adams Francis , available at <http://classics.mit.edu/Hippocrates/hippooath.html> (last visited December 11, 2012).

American Medical Association, “Code of Medical Ethics, Opinion 5.05,” available at <http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.page> (last visited December 11, 2012).

Collin J. M. Leib E. J. , and Markel D. , “Punishing Family Status,” Boston University Law Review 88, no. 5 (2008): 1327–1423.

42 U.S.C. § 67 (2003).

Wang M. J. , Child Abuse Reporting Requirements (August 3, 2012) (unpublished research, on file with Baylor College of Medicine).

TX. Fam. Code § 261.001.

See Wang , supra note 15.

U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, “Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect: Summary of State Laws,” 2008, available at <http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/manda.cfm> (last visited December 11, 2012); National Conference of State Legislatures, Mandatory Reporting of Child Abuse and Neglect: 2012 Introduced State Legislation, 2012, available at <http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/human-services/2012-child-abuse-mandatory-reporting-bills.aspx> (last visited December 11, 2012).

Id. (U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services).

Id. New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas, and West Virginia do not recognize the clergy-penitent privilege as adequate grounds for failing to report suspected child abuse.

See Wang , supra note 15.

DC. Ann. Code § 16–2301

ME. Ann. Stat. Tit. 22 § 4002

MA. Code of Mass. Regs. Tit. 110, § 2.00

MO. Ann. Stat. § 210.110

OH. Rev. Stat. §§ 2151.031.

Id.; These states are: Alabama, AL. Ala. Code § 26-14-1(1)-3., Arizona, AZ. A.R.S. § 13–3620., California, CA. West's Ann. Cal. Penal Code § 11165.9 (2011), Welf. & Inst. Code § 300., Hawaii, HI. Rev. Stat. § 350–1., Idaho, ID. Idaho Code § 16–1602., Indiana, IN. Ann. Code § 31-34-1-3., Maryland, MD. Fam. Law § 5–701., Mississippi, MS. Ann. Code § 43-21-105., Montana, MT Ann. Code § 41-3-102., Nevada, NV. Rev. Stat. §§ 432B.100., New Hampshire, NH. Rev. Stat. § 169-C:3., New Mexico, NM. Ann. Stat. § 32A-4-2., North Carolina, NC. Gen. Stat. § 7B-101., Oklahoma, OK. Ann. Stat. Tit. 10A, § 1-1-105., Oregon, OR. Rev. Stat. §41B.005., Pennsylvania, PA. Cons. Stat. Tit. 23 § 6303. Tennessee, TN. Ann. Code § 37-1-602., Utah, UT. Ann. Code § 78A-6-1051., and Vermont, VT. Ann. Stat. Tit. 33 § 4912.

HI. Rev. Stat. § 350–1.

See Wang , supra note 15.

The District of Columbia allows 10 years from when the victim turns 21 years old, DC. Ann. Code § 16–2301; Georgia's limitation is seven years from the earlier of the victim turning 16 years old or discovery GA. Ann. Code § 19-7-5(b); Iowa allows 10 years from when the victim turns 18 IA. Ann. Stat. § 232.68; and Utah has a eight year grace period if reported within four years of the offense UT. Ann. Code § 78A-6-105.

In Georgia, the time period of prosecution for incest of a victim less than 16 years old does not begin to run until the earlier of when the victim reaches 16 or reports the crime GA. Ann. Code § 19-7-5(b); Indiana allows for prosecution up until the victim is 31 years old, IN. Ann. Code § 31-34-1-3.

See Wang , supra note 15. The states that allow for a DNA evidence exception are: Georgia, GA. Ann. Code § 19-7-5(b), Michigan, MI. Comp. Laws § 722.622, Minnesota, MN. Ann. Stat. § 626.556, Subd. 2, Montana, MT. Ann. Code § 41-3-102, Oklahoma, OK. Ann. Stat. Tit. 10A, § 1-1-105, Pennsylvania, PA. Cons. Stat. Tit. 23 § 6303, and Utah, UT. Ann. Code § 78A-6-1051.

Kohane I. S. Masys D. R. , and Altman R. B. , “The Incidentalome: A Threat to Genomic Medicine,” JAMA 296, no. 2 (2006): 212–215.