The Effect of Bone Mineral Density on Anchor Function and Its Implication on the Pull-out Strength of Trans-osseous Sutures and Ultrafix Rotator Cuff Anchors

Abstract

Background

An experimental study was carried out to assess the influence of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the humeral head, neck and greater tuberosity in seven pairs of fresh frozen humeri on the pull out strength of the Ultra-Fix Anchor (Stryker, Inc, USA) and the standard intra-osseous sutures used to repair rotator cuff tears.

Method

An anchor and a transosseous suture were placed in a trough, created with a 6 mm burr in the cuff footprint of each humeral head by the same specialist shoulder surgeon (L.N.). The technique for intra-osseous suture and anchor localisation were standardised using a 5 Metric (No 2) braided polyester suture (Ethibond, Ethicon, UK). Both fixation methods were subjected to tensile testing with the humeri mounted at 30° of abduction corresponding to the direction of anatomical pull of the supraspinatus muscle.

Results and discussion

There was a significant linear correlation (p = 0.007) between Ultra-fix anchor pull-out strength and humeral head BMD as well as between bone suture failure strength and humeral neck BMD (p = 0.015) There was no correlation between the BMD of the greater tuberosity and failure strengths of both fixation methods. (p = 0.23 for anchor and p = 0.29 for bone suture) The Ultra-fix anchor was significantly stronger in pull-out when compared to the bone suture (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

The mean pull-out strength of the Ultrafix rotator cuff anchor is significantly higher when compared to the traditional bone suture technique for anchorage into a proximal humerus trough (141.7 N and 111.6 N, respectively).There is a significant correlation between the total BMD of the proximal humerus (head, neck and greater tuberosity regions) and the pull-out strength of both the anchor (p = 0.039) and bone sutures (p = 0.024).

Keywords

Bone mineral density pull-out strength anchors shoulder trans-osseous sutures rotator cuff

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mclaughlin

. Lesions of the musculotendinous cuff of the shoulder. The exposure and treatment of tears with retraction. J Bone Joint Surg 1944; 26: 31–49.

Barber

. Biodegradable shoulder anchors have a unique mode of failure. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 316–20.

Kim

, Rhee

, Shin

. A modified suture-bridge technique for a marginal dog-ear deformity caused during rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 562–4.

Gerber

, Schneeberger

, Perren

, Nyffeler

. Experimental rotator cuff repair preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 1281–90.

Klinger

, Spahn

. Biomechanical comparison of double-loaded suture anchors using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches versus traditional transosseous suture technique and modified Mason-Allen stitches for rotator cuff repair. Clin Biomech 2007; 22: 106–11.

Spang

, Brucker

. A biomechanical comparison of 2 transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques using bioabsorbable anchors: cyclic loading and failure behaviour. Arthroscopy 2009; 25: 872–9.

Tashjian

, Green

. Initial fixation strength of massive rotator cuff tears: invitro comparisonofsingle-rowsutureanchorandtransosseous tunnel constructs. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 710–6.

Harryman

, Mack

. Rotator cuff repair: correlation of functional results with cuff integrity. Orthop Trans 1990; 14: 565–72.

Van Oostveen

, Schild

. Suture anchors are superior to trans-glenoid sutures in arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation. Arthroscopy 2006; 22: 1290–7.

10.

Craft

, Cawley

. Fixation strength of rotator cuff repairs with suture anchors and the transosseous suture technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5: 32–9.

11.

Barber

, Herbert

. Internal fixation strength of suture anchors – update 1997. Arthroscopy 1997; 13: 355–62.

12.

Brown

, Cooper

. Initial fixation and cyclic loading stability of knotless suture anchors for rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 313–8.

13.

Deakin

, Bruce

. Suture strength and angle of load application in a suture anchor eyelet. Arthroscopy 2005; 21: 1447–51.

14.

Hecker

, Shea

. Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and bankhart lesion repairs. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 874–9.

15.

Reardon

, Moseley

. The fixation strength of suture anchors in the shoulder. Orthop Trans 1992; 16: 665–72.

16.

Barber

, Feder

. The relationship of suture anchor failure and bone density to proximal humerus location: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 1997; 13: 340–5.

17.

Goldhahn

, Hanson

. Incidence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation – a systematic literature review. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 761–72.

18.

Aasen

, Halse

. Body composition analysis by dual xray absortiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments. Scan J Clin Lab Invest 2006; 66: 659–66.

19.

Lee

, Duong

. Biomechanical effects of supraspinatus repair on the glenohumeral joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 65–71.

20.

Fairbairn

, Earnshaw

, Cawte

, Neumann

. The effect of humeral rotation on bone mineral density measurements of the shoulder by DXA. 10th Congress of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow, Salzburg, 15–17th September 1997.

21.

Bardana

, Burks

. The effect of suture anchor design and orientation on suture abrasion: an in vitro study. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 274–81.

22.

Cole

, Provencher

. Safety profile of bioabsorbable shoulder anchors. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 912–3.

23.

Gerber

, Schneeberger

. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76: 371–80.

24.

Tingart

, Warner

. Anchor design and bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: 1466–72.

25.

Reed

, Glossop

, Burkhead

. Full thickness rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical comparison of suture versus bone anchor techniques. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 46–8.

26.

Matsen

, Arntz

. Rotator cuff tendon failure. In: Rockwood

, Matsen

. eds. The Shoulder. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1990: 671–3.

27.

Barber

, Coons

. Suture and Suture anchors – update 2006. Arthroscopy 2006; 22: 1063–9.

28.

Barber

. Suture anchor materials, eyelets and designs: update 2008. Arthroscopy 2008; 24: 859–67.

29.

Demirhan

, Atalar

. Primary fixation strength of rotator cuff repair techniques: a comparative study. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 572–6.

30.

Ozbaydar

, Elhassan

, Warner

. The use of anchors in shoulder surgery: a shift from metallic to bioabsorbable anchors. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 1124–6.

31.

Millar

, Wu

, Murrell

. Open versus two forms of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 966–78.

32.

Barber

, Herbert

. Sutures and suture anchors: update 2003. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 985–90.

33.

Gartsman

. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop 2001; 390: 95–106.

34.

Barber

, Cawley

. Suture anchor failure strength-an in vivo study. Arthroscopy 1993; 9: 647–52.

35.

Kannus

, Leppala

. A rotator cuff rupture produces permanent osteoporosis in the affected extremity, but not in those with whom shoulder function has returned to normal. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 1263–71.

36.

Matsuzaki

, Zaegel

. Effect of suture material and bone quality on the mechanical properties of zone 1 flexor tendon-bone reattachment with bone anchors. J Hand Surgery [Am] 2008; 33: 709–17.