Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories

Abstract

Public diplomacy is a term much used but seldom subjected to rigorous analysis. This article—which draws heavily on a report commissioned by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office in the spring of 2007—sets out a simple taxonomy of public diplomacy's components and their interrelationships. These components are (1) listening, (2) advocacy, (3) cultural diplomacy, (4) exchange, and (5) international broadcasting. It examines five successful and five unsuccessful uses of each individual component drawing from the history of U.S., Franco-German, Swiss, and British diplomatic practice. The failures arise chiefly from a discrepancy between rhetoric and reality. The final section applies the author's taxonomy to the challenges of contemporary public diplomacy and places special emphasis on the need to conceptualize the task of the public diplomat as that of the creator and disseminator of “memes” (ideas capable of being spread from one person to another across a social network) and as a creator and facilitator of networks and relationships.

Keywords

public diplomacy definition history taxonomy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arndt, Richard T. 2005. The first resort of kings: American cultural diplomacy in the twentieth century. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.

Brown, Donald R. 1982. International radio broadcasting: The limits of the limitless medium. New York: Praeger.

Cull, Nicholas J. 1995. Selling war: British propaganda and American “neutrality ” in World War Two. New York: Oxford University Press.

———. Forthcoming. The cold war and the United States Information Agency: Propaganda and public diplomacy, 1945-1989. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Donaldson, Frances. 1984. The British Council: The first fifty years. London: Jonathan Cape.

Ellul, Jacques. 1973. Propaganda: The formation of men's attitudes. New York: Vintage.

Feigenbaum, Harvey B. 2001. Globalization and cultural diplomacy. Center for Arts and Culture. http://www.culturalpolicy.org/pdf/globalization.pdf .

Heath, Chip , and Dan Heath. 2007. Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. New York: Random House.

Huntington, Samuel P. 2004. Who are we? The challenges to America's national identity . New York: Simon & Schuster .

10.

Krotz, Ulrich. 2002. The ties that bind: The parapublic underpinnings of Franco-German relations as construction of international value. Cambridge, MA: Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University. http://www.ces.fas.harvard.edu/publications/docs/pdfs/Krotz4.pdf .

11.

Sandeen, Eric J. 1995. Picturing an exhibition: The family of man and 1950s America . Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

12.

Seib, Philip. 2006. Broadcasts from the blitz: How Edward R. Murrow helped lead America into war. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books.

13.

Steichen, Edward. 1955. The family of man. New York: Museum of Modern Art.

14.

Vion, Antoine. 2002. Europe from the bottom up: Town twinning in France during the Cold War. Contemporary European History 2 (4): 623-40.

15.

Van Drehle, David. 2006. A lesson in hate. Smithsonian Magazine , February. http://www.smithsonianmagazine.com/history-archaeology/presence-feb06.html .