Effect of Conductive Hearing Loss and Middle Ear Surgery on Binaural Hearing

Abstract

This study investigated whether conductive hearing loss reduces normal binaural hearing advantages and whether binaural hearing advantages are normal in patients who have had hearing thresholds improved by middle ear surgery. Binaural hearing was assessed at a test frequency of 500 Hz using the masking level difference and interaural time discrimination thresholds. Results indicated that binaural hearing is often poor in conductive lesion patients and that the reduction in binaural hearing is not always consistent with a simple attenuation of the acoustic signal. Poor binaural hearing sometimes occurs even when middle ear surgery has resulted in bilaterally normal hearing thresholds. Our preliminary results are consistent with the interpretation that auditory deprivation due to conductive hearing loss may result in poor binaural auditory processing.

Keywords

auditory deprivation auditory masking conductive hearing loss interaural time discrimination masking level difference middle ear surgery sound localization stapedectomy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hirsh

. Influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition. J Acoust Soc Am 1948; 20: 536–44

Jerger

Brown

Smith

. Effect of peripheral hearing loss on the MLD. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110: 290–6

Olsen

Noffsinger

Carhart

. Masking-level differences encountered in clinical populations. Audiology 1976; 15: 287–301

Quaranta

Cervellera

. Masking level differences in normal and pathological ears. Audiology 1974; 13: 428–31

Bocca

Antonelli

. Masking level difference: Another tool for the evaluation of peripheral and cortical defects. Audiology 1976; 15: 480–7

Quaranta

Cassano

Cervellera

. Clinical value of the tonal masking level difference. Audiology 1978; 17: 232–8

Zwislocki

Feldman

. Just noticeable differences in dichotic phase. J Acoust Soc Am 1956; 28: 860–4

Nilsson

Liden

. Sound localization with phase audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1978; 81: 291–9

Hausler

Marr

Colburn

. Sound localization with impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 65 (suppl 1): S133

10.

Levitt

. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 467–77

11.

Hawkins

Wightman

. Interaural time discrimination ability of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1980; 19: 495–507

12.

Hall

Tyler

Fernandes

. Monaural and binaural auditory frequency selectivity measured using bandlimited and notched-noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 894–8

13.

Dolan

. Effects of masker spectrum level on masking-level differences at low frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 1507–12

14.

McFadden

. Masking-level differences determined with and without interaural disparities in masker intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 212–23

15.

Yost

. Discriminations of interaural phase differences. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55: 1299–303

16.

Rubel

. Auditory system development. In: Gottlieb

Krasnegor

eds. Measurement of audition and vision in the first year of life. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984: 117–37

17.

Webster

. Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 392–6

18.

Smith

ZDJ

Gray

Rubel

. Afferent influences on brain-stem auditory nuclei of the chicken. N — Laminaris dendritic length following monaural conductive hearing loss. J Comp Neurol 1983; 220: 199–205

19.

Clopton

Silverman

. Plasticity of binaural interaction. II. Critical period and changes in midline response. J Neurophysiol 1977; 40: 1275–80

20.

Clopton

Silverman

. Changes in latency and duration of neural responding following developmental auditory deprivation. Exp Brain Res 1978; 32: 39–47

21.

Folsom

Weber

Thompson

. Auditory brainstem responses in children with early recurrent middle ear disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 249–53